‘of Our Time, ‘Imperialism Today — Hall book aid Imperialism Today: An Evalu- ation of Major Issues and Events 3 by Gus Hall. Available from Progress Books; hard cover edition — $15.75, Paperback — $4.95. By G. SHISHKIN According to U.S. census figures, in 1970, 27 million Ame- ricans—8.6% of all white and 29.8% of all Black families — had incomes below the official poverty line. “Why, despite wars on pov- erty, progressive income taxa- tion and relatively high employ- ment, does the American econ- Omy so stubbornly perpetuate inequality>?” asks the weekly New Republic with studied nai- vete, The true answer to this and aed associated questions can < found in “Imperialism To- ree An Evaluation of Major ssues and Events of Our Time,” - new book by Gus Hall, gen- ral secretary of the Communist Party of the USA. ; The U.S. Hall writes, posses- €s everything needed to banish poverty for all time. If this has a been done, if, according to e latest statistics, 540 million people in the world live in the ee of death by starvation, reason is imperialism. Costs In Lives Employing the Marxist dialec- - tical method, Hall lays bare the x ulcers and crimes of Ame- ee capitalism. The aggres- ie + Vietnam alone has taken "A ives of more than 50,000 pstatis and maimed 300,000. at to this the millions who a a an early death because tions adequate safety precau- fons in. industry and occupa- Gent diseases. In the past 50 a 100 million serious indus- teregnccidents have been regis- ing a the United States. Dur- ae orld War II, 11 million re een workers were killed ne goes in such accidents, 11 sited, than the casualties hela: y the U.S. on the bat- fe adduces a wealth none. ua material showing that aan sa the scientific and tech- dts ee revolution has funda- tion ee improved the protec- abs ete worker’s life and ss aa n 1958-59 alone the ac- ae Tate in manufacturing in- sha Sas by 30%, in iron Sr by 70%, and in the Bean as industry by 157%. the ae “finance capital uses sath Rec technological revo- aah © intensify its murderous an of the working tion “ea the whole, exploita- atte been intensified in the period by more than 70%. Breeds Militarism a Sak discusses in detail Betinlie Ninist' thesis that im- hacen engenders war and aon breeds militarism. The Aha reminds us that in the CHiwee en the American militar ar and World War I, U.S. zs ae, Spending as a rule did tbr! €ed 1% of the gross na- the ae Even in 1939, on aAnnea: World War II, it GNP. B to only 1.3% of the the : ut since World War II ate has run at a steady GUS HALL From his analysis of the ag- gressive essence of imperialism, Hall draws the conclusion that U.S. imperialism “is far from relinquishing war aS a means of settling international problems.” At the same time he warns against overestimation of the strength of imperialism. “The warlike posture of im- perialism is an inherent charac- teristic that impels it to go on the prowl, seeking the weak spots. But this characteristic is forced to operate within the re- alities of the new world balance of forces. It must take into ac- count the forces of anti-imperi- alism—the growing economic, military and political might of the socialist third of the world, the thrust of national liberation forces, and the political aware- ness of the working class and other people of the capitalist world.” Falling Behind The: positions of U.S. imper- ialism are being eroded also by the sharp inter-imperialist con- tradictions between the U.S. and its principal rivals, and the growth of centrifugal tendencies in the imperialist camp. As a a result of the operation of the law of uneven development of capitalism, the United States has latterly lost. a number of important positions. It has fallen far behind some other capitalist countries, espe- cially Japan and West Germany, for rates of economic growth. For the first time since 1933 the U.S. has had to devalue the dollar. ‘U.S. imperialism is los- ing its place on the pinnacle of the pyramid.” It is clearly over- straining itself. “It must now either retreat or keep spending billions of dollars to maintain the operation of its more than 3,000 overseas military bases, while its chief imperialist rivals spend relatively small amounts for their military establish- ments.” All this, Hall says, once again underscores the need for full clarity on the operation of the centrifugal forces in capi- talism in order to utilize them in the interests of the revolu- tionary movement. Are You For or Against? The USS. Communist leader devotes much attention to ide- ological questions. This is not fortuitous, for, as he points out himself, *“U.S. imperialism is not only the arsenal of world in struggle imperialism, it has also become its ideological headquarters.” Hundreds of institutions, gov- ernment and private, with thou- sands of millions of dollars to spend are engaged in the U.S. in ideological indoctrination in the interests of imperialism. This is done through the medium of books and periodicals published in millions of copies and radio and television broadcasts beam- ed to all parts of the world. In the circumstances, Hall stresses, effective steps to coun- teract the imperialist ideological and political subversion acquire particular importance. “In to- day’s world it is impossible not to react to the central question of our times. Are you for or against imperialism? Are you enough against imperialism that you will get off the slippery rock of non-alignment and join those who are fighting imperial- ism?” As a Marxist, Hall approach- es the question of non-align- ment dialectically, from clear- cut class positions. “When forc- es who are in the ranks of the opposition to imperialism move to a position of non-alignment, it is a victory for imperialism. But when forces who support imperialism move tO a position of ‘neutrality’, that is a defeat for imperialism.” This is a law of the class struggle. Fakery and Opportunism Hall dwells in detail on the class-collaborationist role played by opportunists of all hues. “To proclaim one’s neutrality in the class struggle on a world scale is fakery and opportunism, It is a way of siding with the class enemy.” In this connection he condemns the opportunist posi- tion of the Maoists. “The Maoist leadership of the Communist Party of China has bitterly de- nounced U.S. imperialism in words, but during the last years its position on specific world developments has been in the same orbit with U.S. imperial- ism.” The book analyzes the Maoist stance on such cardinal issues of the day as the national libe- ration struggle of the people of Bangladesh or the problem of the final abolition of the colonial system. The picture that emerg- es is perfectly clear, Hall writes. “At the U.N. the Chinese dele- gation is following the Maoist line to the letter. It is using the UN platform for slandering the Soviet Union and opportunistic- ally either voting with the U.S. or, when. the issue is too hot, opportunistically staying away. This is opportunism. This is playing footsy with imperialism. This is the. stuff unprincipled alliances with imperialism are made of. The few weeks follow- ing the admittance of People’s China into the UN has done much to expose the raw nature of opportunism, the depth of the unscrupulousness of the Maoist policies.” Defeats for Imperialism In conclusion Hall voices his firm confidence that capitalism as a socio-economic system is inevitably doomed, and not only because it has outlived its time, “In today’s world it is impossible not to react to the central ques- tion of our times. Are you for or against imperialism..." asks Gus Hall in his new book. but because the new forces that have emerged hasten its end. “The drive of U.S. imperial- ism to dominate, exploit and enslave the world, launched after the second world war, has ignominiously bogged down. Some call it “overextension”’, others a “miscalculation” but no matter what one calls it, it is imperialist aggression, and it is those policies of aggression that have now suffered defeats.” These are defeats for imperial- ism in general and U.S. imperial- ism in particular. Aggression has indeed bogged down in the rice paddies of In- dochina, the deserts of North Africa, the mountains of Chile, and the sugar plantations of Cuba. U.S. imperialism is com- pelled to manoeuvre and retreat. It is no longer able to cling to its old positions and is losing battles of utmost importance. At the same time Gus Hall issues this reminder: “That world capitalism has been marked for extinction and that world imperialism is in serious new difficulties are assessments of processes: this does not _mean the processes have reach- ed their end. U.S. imperialism will continue its policies of ag- gression. It will continue to seek for a new capitalist world structure. It will continue to be~ the arsenal for world reaction. What is important is that the struggle against its policies will take place in the context of the new balance of relationships, in the new stage of the crisis.” For the struggle against imper- ialism to be successful, it is im- perative that all the revolution- ary. forces..of,.our_ time unite. se U.S. progressives have wel- comed the publication of this Marxist study of present-day imperialism. It is a valuable con- tribution to the anti-imperialist struggle of the revolutionary: forces. Pentagon lists 25 top killers The Defense Department recently revealed a list of its top 25 defense contractors for 1970. Following are the names and amount in government contracts. 1. Lockheed ,.3....-- eee reece eens . General Dynamics .....--+-++++>> . General Electric . United Aircraft . North American Rockwell Be ae Se . Gruman Q. Litton Industries ......-----+-+-- . Hughes Aircraft 11. Ling Temco Vought . Boeing 13. Textron 14. Westinghouse Electric 15. Sperry Rand 16. Honeywell ...... 5-0 ee eee reece 17. General Motors .......-.+-+++++- 19. Ford . RCA . IBM 25. Raymond Morrison Knudsen 2 3 4. American Telephone & Telegraph .. . 5. McDonnell Douglas ......--+-+-++ 6 7 8 Aer ees See OY Se ee ee $1,847,738,000 Calateaps Joe 2 3s eietign = $1,183,260,000 Ose Meee 5a ama se $1,000,452,000 So SG $707,130,000 Ais Seta oe eee eee $397 ,928,000 PACIFIC TRIBUNE—FRIDAY, JANUARY 12, 1973—PAGE 7