Ye WHAT'S BEHIND CONTRACTORS’ LOCKOUT? : Policy tipoff given at Calgar By JOHN HUNTER (This is the first of two articles) The building trades unions in B.C. are under heavy fire irom the building contractors who are out to freeze wages and undermine their bargaining position. In their campaign the contractors are using lockouts, newspaper propaganda and ‘mass layoffs, and relying heavily on R. K. Gervin, former secretary- treasurer of Vancouver Trades and Labor Council, who is their chief negotiator. While these facts are widely known in the labor movement, it is not so widely known that some of the top leaders of the building trades unions in this country, mostly international union representatives, and em- ployer representatives have met privately and discussed policies that objectively help- ed to create the present situa- tion in this province. This is a serious charge and must be supported by factual evidence. On September 27-28 last year, 32 persons were regis- terd at the Fourth Inter-Pro- vincial Conference of the British Columbia and Alberta Building and _ Construction Trades Council, which con- vened in the Labor Temple at Calgary. Of those present, ‘28 repre- sented the - building trades unions and four the General Contractors Association and the Heavy Construction As- sociation. In the official min- utes of the conference, all 32 are listed as delegates. R. K. Gervin, L. Savage, D. Ley- den and H. Ayling represent- ed the employers. Thirteen of the 28 union men were international representa- tives (roadmen), representing the following unions: Lathers, Electrical Workers, Painters, Teamsters, Laborers, Boiler- makers, Plumbers, Operating Engineers, Carpenters and Plasterers. Ths ee One of the main questions discussed by the delegates was how to deal with rank and file militancy and how to curb militant job action. Speaking on work stoppages that had occurred in B.C., R. K. Gervin said: “‘I don’t know, sometimes when we look and see these disputes and work stoppages that arise from them, we wonder perhaps -if maybe the work is being car- ried on too steadily. “I don't want to be unfair or unkind, that is not my pur- pose, but I do know this, that when there is a jurisdictional] dispute, when there is a work stoppage which is serious to the contractors, to the econ- omy of the province, the in- ternational officers are not there. “The business agents do not always accept their responsi- bility in this regard. I don’t _ believe, because they do noth- ing to penalize the people that take action on job action and cause work stoppages. It is a rare occasion when — and in fact I don’t know of any oc- casions when these people have been penalized for tak- ing action that was quite ‘il- legal.” Henry Ayling, Heavy Con- struction Association. said: “I am going to be a little more specific, and maybe a little blunter than Mr. Gervin has been. ‘Up until two years ago, things were pretty smooth. We had our arguments, we had our grievances on our jobs, and we accepted them, and there was no stoppage of work. We sat down with the business agents, and the fore- man, or the general super- intendents on the job, and these grievances were settled. “The situation gradually deteriorated, and it came about through the skop stewards’ movements. The business agents have gradu- ally lost their responsibility and the power that was given to them by the unions, and the responsibility of the job, in a large number of cases, has been taken over by _ the shop stewards. “T don’t mean to say that that refers to every union, but it does refer particularly to the metal section, and to the electrical section in the southern half of B.C.” “If you gentlemen are will- ing to sit down with us or among yourselves and give us your assurance that you will take care of the situation, you will get control of your mem- bership, we will do every- thing in our power, and we will sit along with you, and we will do everything we can to help the situation, but unless the situation is cor- rected, capital will not come to B.C. and Alberta, and we all will be looking for a job, both the members and the contractors.” L. Savage, of the Common- wealth Construction Company, was worried about produc- tivity. “We are losing pro- ductivity. We are not getting our dollar’s. worth.” xt bo xt A speaker listed as Troyer, District Council, Calgary, who prefaced his remarks by say- ing, “I am not a delegate,” asked a question of the em- ployer group: “I would like to ask the second speaker if he would care to explain a little more what he means by his phrase and views on con- trol of membership.” Ayling replied: “The ex- pression I used, ‘control of membership, is used in the phrase if you have a line of authority set up—say a super- visory group, and this group cannot permit your member- ship to run wild — they must be responsible to some officer or officers of the union.” But Troyer was not satis- fied, and he said so in no un- certain terms: “The answer doesn’t satisfy me, for the simple reason I feel the speaker cannot be too ‘aware of trade union princi- ples . . . Our membership is not controlled by any offi- cial. Our membership is set up on a basis and the mem- bers have constitutional rights and any business agent and I am a servant of the members, and I shall always regard my- self as such, “We certainly can insist that members of our locals carry out these regulations, but over and above that we can- not go, and if we are good citizens and we _ understand the principles of democracy, further than that we will not go, and if I should ever in- tend to go further than that, then I say we are the ones who should be dealt with and not management.” Jack Ross, of Vancouver, international representative of the Electrical Workers, didn’t agree with Troyer. “J know of no word in the English -language . that has been more prostituted than the word ‘democracy,’” he said. “I think the last speaker has answered himself. ‘I must say again that I am rather handicapped, there are only two langugages that I know, very little English and lots of profanity. “You — the employer — I say this to labor and I say it in all sincerity — it doesn’t make any difference what causes the stoppage of work— it is a stoppage of work and we should all be together. We are plagued. with these things as much as you are and we don’t like it. “If we are keeping: capi- tal out of the country or the employer is keeping capital out of the country, it is our own fault and we must work it out correctly.” Cc. Priestly, international representative of the Plumb- ers, was even blunter in re- plying to Troyer: “We have been advised un- officially that there are two men being placed on the the Building Trades Depart- ment in Canad& “Canada is a long way from the Pacific to the Atlantic, and it could be set up in Ont- ario, or Washington, or in Winnipeg. The problem is — I have to solve one of the big- gest problems in the organiza- tion so far as British Colum- bia is concerhed. I don’t know what the answer is going to be. I am going to be recteiv- ing some directive one of these days, where I am going to have to do something, but that directive will come when I make the recommendation that it be done. “Outside of that, the setting up of any board of settling any jurisdictional dispute does not stop the work stoppage. The mechanics are already there if we can. make them work. Somebody has to take the bull by the horns, and whether the local union stays democratic or not somebody has to be hurt — or in the pocket where it hurts, and maybe then they will sit up and take notice.” Speaking of the setting up of a building trades. jurisdic- tional board in Canada Priest- ly said: “As far aS we are concern- ed, the board will be set up within the Building Trades Industry, and not the Cana- dian. Labor Congress, where we are going to be told by the industrial organizations what we are going to do.” J. Hannigan of the Sheet Metal Workers’ Union wasn’t too fussy about educating union members.: : “J don’t know why we talk so much about education with the trade unions and working people generally. There is danger in education. We might educate them _ too much. . “We are being told by cer- tain of the speakers this afternoon that there are agi- tators, who are working in- convenience on the people. At this stage I think we should be told in clearer language who and where these agita- tors are.” Priestly replied: “For me or anyone else to come out and name names and certain parties belong to this party, or certain persons belong to this party, or things like that — that is one thing, those statements cannot be made, naming: names, until the persons naming the names have it down and can prove f June 13, 1958 — PACIFIC TRIBUNE— it, they haa better sa ™ | ing. : Fy ‘If you accuse anyon don’t care who the perso i of subersive action, unless can back it up im black ae white, brother you ha eal keep your mouth shuts if cause the people yore dealing with are pretty § wt cookies themselves; an less you. can back it wa are going to get your into a jackpot.” oy ott Ross of the Electrical di ers amplified this i guised attack on a militants: «_, it is true im OW " didn't just § — organization we clean house. They sew ! over the dirt and ™ poet couple out. The pat’ yt are all busy. I bee: of should clean up OUF a iit ganization. If you sw i? ; a duck, dive like @ OMG ae you have all the same ‘pat teristics of a duck, the f cat" are you are a duck: we mi do these things. W a own children you havé rect them when tel ; wrong, and there isn't jo correction from "| i agents and internatio? resentatives.” ch! Hannigan of ‘ol Metal Workers, wh? nat Ross, seemed to nin ys? greater part of the 48" (yf movement in B.C. was dm ing the “ducks” refers by Ross. y oon 2 If what has bee? fue so far proves anythiMt — this: j of @ The thinkin? i @ dominant group at a ference reflects the © aj tive thinking of the feat of roadmen, thelt y: rank and file militar ig ® They have a more productive. the agitators and © flow into the construe fi dustry.” : The associates of sot ff 5 acting on orders fron a 1 in 1955, beheaded so of the Electrical wou Vancouver and imp® io : tatorship on the ¥ ast f 3 the events of the Po months, the line }iP® ef) tors’ strike earlier tr! ni and now the cor ail lockout, show the ia this policy. : and The witch-huntiné | di pression of democt@ yi? have weakened the i causing internal dis strengthened the tora. tion of the employe? gt the union to their PU to destroy it. f ital ap ‘i? if ie a