a wi By HENRI ALLEG Henri Alleg was one of the leaders of the Algerian Commun- ist Party during the seven-year war for independence. In 1957 he was arrested by the French colo- nial authorities and savagely tor- tured. He wrote about his experi- ences in his bodk, “The Question.” When Algiers was liberated, Al- leg was again Editor of Alger Re- publicain. The 1965 Boumedienne coup forced him into exile again. At the end of January this year, a delegation of lawyers ar- rived in Algeria to inquire into what had happened to President Ben Bella and many other pat- riotic Algerians held in secret for three years without having been tried, or even accused. Received by the Minister of Justice of the Boumedienne Gov- ernment, this delegation express- ed the feelings generated by the flagrant violations of human rights in Algeria, rights guaran- teed.on the one hand by.the UN Charter (of which Algeria is one of the signatories) and by the Algerian Constitution itself. The Minister, M. Bedjaoui, as- sured his questioners—and his statement received wide publi- city—that the greater part of the prisoners would be set free be- fore too long a delay. According to the Minister there was no question of put- ting on trial men whom he des- cribed as “patriots” and who had rendered eminent service to their country in the past. Months have passed and the promise, unfortunately, has not been kept. A number of the prisoners are in a precarious state of health — for example, the former journalist of Alger Republicain Bouzid Benallegue, and the veteran Paul Caballero, who was one of the secretaries of the Algerian Communist Party. The prisoners are now in their fourth year of detention without counting those they passed in colonialist jails. Cahallero, for example, is passing his tenth yearin jail. < . But still more disturbing are the reports coming through dur- ing. the summer of an increase in the repression striking the broadest progressive circles. . In July and August, many thousands of arrests were. made in various regions of the coun- GERIA six years of independence ‘oe Hand-gathering cereal crops in the south of Algeria. try, including 2,000 in the city of Algiers alone. Arrested in the middle of the night, frequently tortured by methods used not so long ago against Algerian fighters by colonialist paratroopers, deprived of food and sleep for days and nights, isolated and blindfolded, men and women “disappeared” for several weeks and sometimes months at a time, without being able to give any sign of living to their next of kin, let alone get in touch With lawyers. — e The police who arrested them tried desperately to get them to admit to being members of the Party of the Socialist Avant- Garde of Algeria, which as is known, today embraces Com- munists and former militants of the FLN who were drawn. to Marxism-Leninism. The police released them often, only to arrest them again a few days or weeks later, These man- oeuvres, these attempts to inti- midate them, evidently had the air of accentuating still further the- atmosphere of insecurity and terror reigning in the country. Certain Algerian leaders seem to believe that such a climate will help reinforce their autho- rity — an authority which they have not until now been able to base on popular support. It is paradoxical that a govern- ment which reaffirms with a great deal of insistence its “So- cialist” position and in the field of foreign policy effectively takes up an anti-imperialist position, should exercise such energy in pursuing and persecuting its citizens who are precisely those most devoted partisans of Social- ism and best - anti-imperialist fighters. What are the reasons for this evident contradiction? Algeria was shaken during last July by a serious political crisis. . Undoubtedly this was less spec- tacular than that of December 1967 in which the tanks of Tahar Zbiri, chief of staff of the army, . faced an air force still loyal to Col. Boumedienne. The crisis was nonetheless real, with a clash between, on the one hand the most reaction- ary elements in the regime—one of whose heads is the Minister of the Interior, Medeghri—and, on the other, those who support- ed certain progressive measures, such as the application of agri- cultural reform and the national- ization of foreign companies. ~ It was, to be precise, follow- ing the important nationalization measures covering 18 big for- eign companies, the majority French, that the conflict took shape. : Medeghri, making himself the spokesman of the neo-colonial- ists and their allies inside the country, had no hesitation in op- posing nationalization and des- ‘cribing it as measures of “politi- cal demagogy and improvisa- tion.” e He offered his resignation from the Government, with the idea of obliging Boumedienne and the supporters of nationalization to retreat or at least to put on the brakes, The future will show how far this manoeuvre was successful, for the crisis has been provision- ally overcome by a new compro- mise which has kept Medeghri in his post.. And it was in the wake of this compromise that the wave of re- pression mentioned above was unleashed, as if the blow against the progressives had constituted one of the terms of the agree- ment and “satisfaction” accord- ed to the reactionaries. But who would such repres- sion benefit if ‘not in the first place reaction based on the new - bourgeoisie, greedy to secure its privileges and power? It is this element that was denounced by Colonel Boumedienne in this manner during a recent speech: “We cannot tolerate, after hav- ing driven out foreign colonial- ists, the birth of a -category of Algerians ownjng land and money the better to secure their own future.” Unfortunately, this category has not only been borne for some time but has its representatives highly placed in the State appa- _ ratus and the single party. It is common talk that the No. 1 of the FLN, Kaid Ahmed, is himself a big landlord, own- . ing nearly 3,000 hectares of land (over 7,000 acres) in the Tiaret region, where his family con- stitutes a veritable feudal pow- er. - It is among the “Right Wing” elements of the regime (who still find it convenient to proclaim themselves “Socialists” — albeit in their own style) that one needs to look for the: inspiration for this new terror offensive and re- pression unleashed in Algeria. Their aims are manifold: first of all to be sure, weaken and if possible destroy the Party of the Socialist Avant-Garde Algeria, whose progress has disturbed them, but also to compromise in their anti-popular actions, the progressives and anti-imperial- ists who find themselves to- gether with them in the seats of power. They work in this fashion to isolate them from the masses with the aim of preparing the total handing over of power to the Right. They have in view also certain external objectives. A third-world country which persecutes “its”? Communists, or those associated with them, gives the impression that it is not en- tirely “lost” to the imperialists, despite the links which it has developed with the Socialist countries. The Algerian leaders, in under- taking to play this dangerous game, have not been the first to use anti-Communism as a means of reassuring their powerful capi- talist partners. But it must be said that the reactionary elements which, since the coup d’etat of June 19, 1965, have worked patiently, ob- stinately and with success to in- crease their political and econo- mic influence in independent Al- geria, are not solely responsible for the repression. Among the real anti-imperial- ists and progressives who have official responsibilities, prejudi- ces against -the Communists — “exponents of foreign ideology” — have not disappeared. It appears necessary to them to strike at their Left (and more often than at their Right) to pre- serve their freedom to choose an illusory third way. In fact, this permits the con- solidation of bourgeois and reac- tionary elements, and can only lead, in the end, to their own eviction, a process which has many precedents in the recent history of African and various Arab countries, Algerian revolutionaries, who are conscious of the serious danger of the “radicalization” to the Right which hangs over the regime, which has gone so far as to call in question all the posi- tive decisions taken since inde- pendence, have a difficult and complex task, On the one hand they have to denounce the anti-democratic repression to which they are sub- jected, and on the other hand they have to guard against put- ‘ting “in the same bag” the dif- ferent groups and personalities in power. Such an error would, in fact, PACIFIC TRIBUNE—NOVEMBER 15, 1968— Page 8 hinder any step forward toward the broadest unity of all pro- gressive Algerians (whether they are to be found today in opposl- tion or in the official apparatus of the State ‘or the army). The realization of this union is the first objective of the Party of the Socialist Avant-Garde of Algeria (PAGS). There is no other way of bringing Algeria out of the grave political crisis which has arisen from the coup d’etat. This is why, despite the per secutions, of which it is victim, and while appealing for a fight against a repression which serves only reaction and imperialism, the PAGS defines its position thus: : “Despite new difficulties on the way, lack of understanding and manifestations of sectarian- ism from other patriotic and pro- gressive circles, the PAGS will continue to work more than ever, as in the past, for the union of all progressives wherever they may be found, with the aim of forming a broad democratic and popular front. “This is the only way which. conforms to the interests of the country, to those of the working masses and the Revolution: the way toward the democratization of the political life of the coun- try, toward free and fruitful ex- changes:on the questions of vital interest, whatever may be the other differences which separate progressives on political and ideological questions.” Thus, in displaying their active solidarity toward progréssive Algerian victims of repression, 10 opposing the repeated violations of elementary rights recognized for all detained persons (notably that of choosing a lawyer, see- ing their family and defending themselves before a court) the progressives and democrats throughout the entire world will not merely be doing their human duty, they will be giving prac- tical aid to the Algeriah people in their difficult fight for liberty, democracy and progress.