B.C. farmworkers still unprotected from unregulated toxic pesticides By SEAN GRIFFIN On Aug. 24 last year, farm worker Hamir Singh Grewall was taken to Abbotsford hospital gasp- ing for breath from the pains in his chest and the muscle spasms. Later that same day, he died on the hospital bed, only hours after he had sprayed a field with the deadly pesticide, parathion. The doctor who admitted him noted that the symptoms were, in fact, consistent with parathion poison- ing and suggested that the highly toxic pesticide might have been the cause of his death. For Grewall’s family as for the Canadian Farmworkers’ Union, the death appeared to confirm the worst fears of farmworkers as well as many researchers: that the widespread use of pesticides in B.C. vegetable and tree fruit farms, has created an enormous health hazard the dimensions of which have only begun to be known. What the organizers for the CFU do know is that, even as various pesticides-are implicated by scien- tific research as contributing to myriad of occupational diseases, including cancer, farmworkers continue to be exposed to them in the fields. But even Grewall’s death did not dramatize that issue for the provin- « cial government or the WCB. An autopsy revealed that he had atheroscleroris (deposits on the in- ner walls of the arteries) adding weight to a later diagnosis that he had died of a heart attack, although he was only 34. Strangely enough, there was on-- ly aroutine blood test conducted as part of the autopsy. The RCMP lab which conducted it received only seven millilitres of blood and was not given any information as to the particulars of the death. Had he known that pesticides were involved, a lab spokesman said, he would have required at least 25 ml of blood as well as tissue and liver samples to run a check. ' But it was not sent — and the ques- tion as to whether parathion played any role in Grewall’s death remains unanswered. It is that way for perhaps other deaths as well — and certainly is the case for hundreds of ailments, ranging from simple headaches and eye irritation to increased susceptibility to cancer. Many workers know that pesticides are implicated but because of conflic- ting, and even occasionally fraudulent evidence, the proof is elusive. And action to correct the problem comes tragically slowly. For farm workers, the problem is even greater: since they are ex- ~ cluded from Workers’ Compensa- tion Board Act, they do not have the protection, minimal though it is, of WCB regulations which pro- vide for protective apparel when using pesticides and maximum levels of allowable exposure. The parathion that Grewall was using in the Abbotsford field, is, according to Jos Campioni, a spokesman for the federal health protection branch, ‘‘one of the most toxic substances you can work with.”’ An organo-phosphate, it was originally developed by the Nazis for biological warfare. Now used in the Fraser Valley as an insecticide to treat beans, peas, carrots, onions and a variety of other vegetables and tree fruits, it retains its lethal qualities. It is absorbed through the skin and even minute doses can be fatal. Because of the danger, the pesti- cide issue, perhaps more than other, has focused the farmwork- ers’ current campaign for inclusion of farmworkers under Workers’ Compensation legislation. - Aneven more chilling case is that of Captan, a fungicide used exten- sively in the province by both fruit and vegetable farmers and even by home gardeners. Captan was on a list of 89 suspect chemicals, made public by the federal government in 1980. They had been given approval for use based on fraudulent test studies conducted by Industrial Biotest Laboratories, a U.S. firm. Subse- quent testing by federal agencies has resulted in the recent banning of some chemicals on the list but Captan is not among them. Campioni told the Tribune Tuesday that the health protection branch ‘feels very uncomfortable’’ with Captan and stated bluntly: ‘‘We would like to see it banned.’’ The actual decision to remove it from the market, however, lies with the federal department of agriculture. A study submitted to the branch in January confirmed a 1978 U.S. study indicating that Captan was a potent carcinogen (capable of caus- ing cancer). In that study, tumors were reported in 25 to 52 percent of laboratory animals treated with three diffeent doses of Captan. UNE Address Postal Code i tt li li i, li, An, My RY OF (OWN es eS tam enclosing: Published weekly at Suite 101 — 1416 Commercial Drive, Vancouver, B.C. V5L 3X9. Phone 251-1186 Read the paper that fights for labor 1 year $12 C2 years $22 (0 6 months $7 F OidO New Foreign 1 year $15 1 Bill me later C Donation$.......... SER ETNA PACIFIC TRIBUNE—OCT. 2, 1981—Page 12 B.C. FARMWORKERS . _ And in neither study was a “‘safe’’ dose indicated, since increased tumors occurred at all doses tested. Campioni said that the branch could set a ‘‘zero tolerance level’’ — ordering that fruits and vegetables be totally free of Captan residue — but that would require taking virtually all fruits and vegetables off the market, a move which he suggested would cause Schaus’7s 5 e— Instead, the branch must wait for the agriculture department to act, a process which is. often dangerously slow, as studies must be considered and affected parties consulted — including the Captan manufacturers. As early as 1975, a British study indicated that the ‘‘mutagenicity”’ (ability to cause gene mutation) of Captan ‘‘is not insignificant and might be appreciable.”’ There are also more immediate effects as a number of tree planters in the Terrace area reported in Ap- ril of this year. The planters, who formed the Pacific Reforestation Workers’ Association to press their case, were working with pine seedl- ings, the roots of which were dip- ped in Captan to prevent fungus growth. Several members of the planting crew reported various symptoms, ranging from contact dermatitis, inflamed skin rashes which spread over the arms and upper body, to chronic skin infections. Nearly all of them reported diarrhea, irritated eyes and headaches. Liz Wright, information office: from the Workers’ Compensation Board, confirmed that the Board had received the complaints from the tree planters and said that in- structions had been sent out to en- sure that planters used gloves to minimize any skin contact. Although it is questionable how valuable the precautions are, Cap- tan is one of several hundred substances controlled by the WCB which has established allowable levels of exposure which are theoretically monitored by the board. Similarly, the workers in provin- cial government tree nurseries, where Captan is also used, have a modicum of protection from both the WCB and their union, the B.C, Government Employees’ Union. BCGEU ‘Local 803 spokesman Wayne. Dermody noted that the nursery workers ‘‘a re all BCIT graduates or long time members of the forest service and they know what they’re working with. “Tf thereis anything unsafe, they just don’t wor! “But that’a a luxury that farm- workers don’t have,’’ he added. _In fact, farmworkers have no protection in law from the health effects of pesticides. And the Cap- tan case has highlighed the grim in- adequacies of current legislation covering pesticides and their use in the province. Captan is extensively used by farmers in_the Fraser Valley, for berry crops and vegetables — yet there is no way of knowing which farmer used the substance at what time, since farmers are not required to obtain a licence if they are spray- ing on their own land. Similarly, according to the Canadian Farmworkers Union, the provincial pesticide control branch keeps no record of pesti- cides used, nor of the farms which use them. It is up to farmers them- selves to monitor the extent and dosage level of their spraying. And since farm workers are ex- cluded from the WCB Act, there are no safety inspections on farms to determine whether even the board’s minimum ~ requirements are being maintained. As a result, farmworkers enter- ing the fields can -be entering a biological mine field: they have no way of knowing whether the field Has just been treated with Captan, ‘or with any other pesticide. Moreover, since, because of low wages and lack of day care facilities, farm workers are forced to take their children into the fields with them, the already significant risk is compounded, given Captan’s known record as both a carcinogenic and mutagenic substance. That danger, in fact, prompted University of Western Ontario geneticist Joseph Cummins to warn: ‘‘Pregnant women should be out of the fields, toddlers should be out of the fields most childhood cancers — brain cancers, leukemia, bone cancer — are caused by exposure of the mother to carcinogenic agents at the time the baby is being carried.” Although the larger problems related to pesticide control and the near-criminal delay between the time a substance is reported unsafe and actual banning, would remain, ‘at least some of the risk for farm workers could be minimized with immediate legislation to include them under the Workers’ Compen- sation Act. In a brief earlier this year, the CFU called for legislation to amend the Act to include farm- workers and to include farm work as an industrial undertaking listed in the Act. CFU president Raj Chouhan said that the union would be press- ing the campaign for WCB coverage this fall and winter with public meetings, rallies and other actions. The: CFU has called on union locals throughout the province to pass resolutions calling on the pro- vincial government to include all farmworkers under the Workers’ Compensation Act, without excep-’ tion. The union also wants the government to consider special safety regulations for farmworkers similar to those in California which specify that a certain number of hours must elapse after spraying before farm workers can ae the field. The Farmworkers Legal ‘Ser- vices Project, which works closely ..) headquarters have not even sent ‘| scheduled. | construction workers is als ‘|labor centrals will represent | . facing an Saknnen danger in the fields. with the CFU, has also released sta- tistics from the U.S. indicating that ) farm workers have the highest rate of occupational disease in the country. In addition, a study con- ducted among Washington state orchard workers — where condi- tions closely parallel those-in the Okanagan — revealed an abnor- mally high rate of lung and intesti- nal cancers, pernicious anemia, cerebral embolism and thrombo- sis, presumably the result of ex- posure to pesticides. ‘Comparable figures are not available for this province, the Pro- ject noted but ‘‘the dangerous agricultural industry remains the largest single unregulated industry.” likely delay seen for CFL The bid by the international officers of the Buildings Trades to set up the breakaway Cana- dian Federation of Labor ap-— pears headed for a postpone- ment. Although the call for the founding convention was sent | out in August — before the Aug. 25-26 meeting between the Building Trades and the Cana- dian Labor Congress — the deadline for registration has already past and in the case of at least two unions, the Canadian out delegate credential and registration forms to local unions. The founding convention was to have been held Nov. 2-4 in the Skyline Hotel in Ottawa. The deadline has also apparent- ly passed for booking rooms in the hotel. Inits initial call to the conven- tion, the Building Trades noted that further action on the foun- | ding meeting would depend on the outcome of a Aug. 25-26 meeting between the Building Trades andthe CLC. Some agreement on the outstanding issues in: dispute } was reached in that meeting and | a further meeting was subse- quently scheduled for Sept. 14 to deal with the contentious issue of Quebec jurisdiction. Negotiations reportedly broke. down. atthe. Sept. 14) meeting and it was not knownif- yet another meeting was” A particularly critical vote | among some 90,000 Quebec scheduled for November i which workers will decide — 18 a mandatory, government- supervised vote — which of i them. That vote, which will like ly favor the CLC-affiliated FTQ Construction, is expected have a considerable bearing 0” the CLC-Building Trades issue