/8. August llth, 1975 Prior to the question being called on the foregoing resolution, Alderman Laking proposed the following: 1.2 Ac.pel. Moved by Alderman Laking: for children's play area at Seconded by Alderman Mabbett: 3300-3400 bik. Hastings St. That a 1.2 acre portion of the Property described in the "City of housing development Port Coquitlam Zoning By-law, 1969, No. 918, Amendment By-law, 1975, No. 1391" proposed to be dedicated to the City for park purposes, be retained as part of the strata title development and used instead for the purpose of a play area for children. Carried. The question was then called on the previous motion of Aldermen Traboulay and Laking especting first reading of By-law No. 1391. Moved by Alderman Ranger: Seconded by Alderman Mabbett: That By-law No. 1391 be read a second time. Carried. Moved by Alderman Laking: Seconded by Alderman Mabbett: That By-Law No. 1391 be read a third time. Carried. The City Administrator then advised that prior to submission at a Public Hearing scheduled to be held on August 25th, 1975, By-law No. 1392, proposed to authorize issuance of a Land Use Contract, is available for initial consideration. Alderman Ranger introduced a By-law to authorize the City to enter into Land Use Contract No. 14. LUC #14 Auth. Moved by Alderman Ranger: B/law -lst 2 readings Seconded by Alderman Laking: That By-law No. 1392 be read a first time. Carried. Moved by Alderman Mabbetz: Seconded by Alderman Ranger: That By-law No. 1592 be read a second time. Carried. NEW BUSINESS: Ald.Laking re Alderman structural sound- ness report- of the Agricultural Hall and pointed out that it does not include total Aggie Hall Laking referred to the report on the Structural soundness refurbishing costs. The City Administrator stated he did not know exactly what the Council wanted, so he had just asked the consultant for the costs to bring the building into conformity with By-law requirements; however, he stated he would obtain the figures on -eburbishing. Alderman Laking pointed sut that the report does not show the extent of floor rot