Terrace Review — Wednesday, February 7, 1990 Al | ~ Rating the road maintenance ‘Letters to the Editor Ad from Co-op members. _ Most everyone wanted a little: more winter; It didn’t look a lot like Christmas at Christmas. But the fourth and fifth weeks of 1990 changed all that... we got all the snow anyone could ever wish for. by Tod Strachan. | Along: with the snow, however, comes the annual road — maintenance crew-bashing ses- sions, and in that respect 1990 is no different that 1989 or any other year before that. On the street, criticisms were heavy and compliments were few, so the Terrace Review made a few phone calls to see how people really feel. Maintenance. scored: a ‘“‘not. bad’’, but Terrace city maintenance crews didn’t fare quite so well, Canadian Freightways man- ager Bob Petras said the talk among his drivers was that, con- sidering the amount of snow we had in a very short time, things weren’t too bad overall as far as the highways were concerned. ‘*it’s better than last year,’’ says Petras. ‘‘They were trying to do their best and I would give them full marks considering what they were dealing with.’’ In fact, from Prince Rupert to_Burns Lake, he says, there were no real complaints. But this wasn’t true within city limits. Petras concedes that things may not have been all that bad for private vehicles but for the big rigs, he says, it was a nightmare. In the city, “It was very difficult for trucks,’’ Petras says. The major problem: snow piled on top of snow on the center line, leaving no place for cars to park and no room for trucks to turn. The cause, he says, was demonstrated Satur- day morning when there wasn’t a city maintenance vehicle in sight. ‘They have to work week- ends,’ says Petras. “Snow removal isn’t a -five-day-a-week job. They need to stay on top of it. If they had maintained con- trol of the situation from the be- ginning the situation might not have been so bad.” It may seem unfair to put the whole weight of this critique on Canadian Freightways but Petras’ words were. chosen because they echoed, with few exceptions, every call made. The manager of another local truck- ing company, who chose not to be named, said that overall the highways weren’t ‘‘all that bad’ but he didn’t drive in the city so he couldn’t comment on their performance. © The biggest problem between Smithers and Prince Rupert, he ‘ditions from year to’ year, but said, was the wind and that had nothing to do with road main- tenance. He did say that some drivers complained about ‘tough sledding’? on the- highway at times, ‘‘sometimes crews: seemed a little slow to re- .. . spond’’, ‘ amount of snow we had, he says -no one really blamed ‘road but ‘considering the: maintenarice crews. Greyhound spends .a lot of time on the road ‘and Terrace manager Richard Bowen con- cedes that it’s very difficult to compare weather and, road con- : the general consensus seems to. be that things are pretty much. the same as they have. always In general, North Coast Road: been, There has been very little change since maintenance re- - sponsibility was taken from the. ‘ministry and given to private contractors. Bowen points out that, basically, ‘It’s still the same equipment and the same men.. it boils down to how much money you spend.”? Though Bowen didn’t draw a picture, it appears that the converse of that philosophy is also believed to be true. Allthe same, with the excep- tion of the city, Bowen rated northwest roads fairly good when compared to highways found in the Fraser Valley and Fraser Canyon. As far as the city is concerned, though, ‘“‘It’s pret- ty mucha mess,”’ he said. ‘‘They do nothing on the weekends and it’s piled up on them.’’ Speaking on behalf of a local delivery ser- vice, Ted Garner pretty much agreed. ‘The city’s a mess,”’ he said. Even with this statement, however, Garner did rate main city roads much better than residential roads. .Kalum Kabs proved to be somewhat of an exception. Ac- cording to Kalum Kab owner and manager, Ailsa Henderson, drivers there say the highways were bad and the city was worse. The main difference here may be that unlike truck and bus drivers, cab drivers spend much more time driving on city and rural roads than main highways. Henderson’s husband, though, does spend a lot of time on the highway and she says that he reports that the highway from Kitwanga to Smithers was “beautiful”? while the stretch from Kitwanga to Terrace was ‘terrible’. She describes this end of the highway as nothing more than “two ruts’’. A little closer to. home, though, the air- port hill, wasn’t too bad, she says. Although, she adds, ‘Nothing like it should be.”’ Switching to private residents, the comments are little different. Pifer — continued from page AG oriented Sierra Club, which has. lobbyists in the highest places. ° Methinks that if the govern-. ment goes very much against — that recommendation, Bruce may stay out of caucus.a lot longer, despite the vast majori- ty of his executive having voted that he return, cap in hand. Stay tuned. Parting Thought: The only regret I have about taking a quick 12-day holiday (so no column next week!) is that I won't be here to see what, So- cred grande dame Grace Mc-. Carthy does or says (if . anything) in response to Vander Zalm’s blatant challenge to her to put up or | shut up....sort of an “In your face, Grace’. ly good marks. ‘maintenance of rural roads is’ Sandy ‘Sandhals lives at Lakelse Lake and gives North Coast fair- The winter just as good as it has ever been. The city though, he says, is bad, - and his wife, who has lived here all her life, describes them as _ “terrible”? according to San- dhals. And, “This snowfall wasn’t like. the.good old days,”’ ‘he. ‘adds. ‘‘There’s no place to _park,?? ?” says Sandhals, but even. af there was, because of the piles “of snow, there’s no way to open’ the’ ‘passenger door. ““Years ago -jt--was fairly good,’’ recalls Sandhals. ‘But now, it’s not. ‘like it used to be. The town has. gone to the dogs.” Don Highe and Norm Carey - both live in the Woodland Park subdivision north of Terrace and both say they have no com- plaints. Highe, in fact, says that from a dollar point of . view things are even better. Highways used to waste money by plowing and sanding when they didn’t need to, according to Highe. Carey describes rural roads as ‘‘acceptable’’. When compared to ministry days, they’re “‘no worse, no better’ than they were before. But, here again, city public works crews failed to get that slap on the back that might boost worker moral. ‘‘The town is deplorable,”’ says Carey. ‘Speaking from the Kitselas Band office on Queensway, Mel Bevan and. Bill Young said their roads are ‘fairly good’’, Bevan, though, admits to owning a four-wheel drive and Young says he has a front wheel drive. ‘‘There’s no need for anyone to have any trouble as long as they’re not flying around,” says Young. ‘Ti's all in the way we drive.’ Young's philosophy on driv- ing is one that’s likely to be well accepted by both public works and North Coast Road Maintenance. Speaking for the city, director of operations John Colongard says that considering the weather conditions he doesn’t believe city crews have done all that bad. The problem, he says, is the amount of snow that fell in a short period of time. An example of this, he says in response to charges that city crews take weekends off, is what they actually did last weekend. On Saturday, says Colongard, most of the city was done with the exception of the Westview Dr, area on the bench and on Sunday crews worked from 5 a.m. to 8:30 p.m. plowing almost all roads in town. The problem, says Colongard, was that: in places the road was covered by four inches of snow only an hour after the grader had gone by. As far as the piles of snow in the center of the road are con- cerned, Colongard says they get to them as fast as they can, But. before they can, they have to plow every road in town and as. long as it keeps snowing there’s no way they can get to the center line. And at times, in the past two weeks, says Colongard, ‘sWe were buried in snow,’ Adding to the problems caused by continued on page A14 the heavy snowfalls, . warrants an To the Editor; I noticed the advertisement placed in your newspaper by “concerned members of the Ter- race Co-op’’. The intention of the ad was to. counter ‘the cam- paign to expose the seemingly bad corporate decision of the Co-op management in awarding a major renovation contract to Kermodei Construction, whose employees belong to the General Workers’ Union. “I support the principle of co- operation which led residents of our area to establish the Co-op four and one-half decades ago. Unfortunately, -this is the only aspect of this ad on which we find common ground. If the tendering process for this contract had been done on a level playing field whereby both bidding contractors had a good record in construction and equal treatment of their workers, then certainly bid price would become the determining factor. But this is not the case. As has been shown in some detail, based upon public documents, information released under the Federal Access to Information legislation and close monitoring, Kermodei Construction, with its General Worker connection, has failed to meet these criteria. I understand, and believe it to be true, that Co-op management was made aware of this informa-" tion. before the contract was signed. Under these circumstances, the large $200,000 difference in tendered prices should have set alarm bells ringing. Instead, the price appears to have been ac- | answer cepted with little consideration or questions. It is patently incorrect to sug- gest that only two or three trade unionists are involved. Literally hundreds of Co-op members have signed letters of complaint on this issue. These members support cooperative principles, but see that the current Co-op. board and management have deviated from this path. Rather than masking the issue. through ads of this nature, ‘it would seem more appropriate to look for a solution. The Co-op a leadership has made an error. It is time to admit this and enter in- to meaningful dialogue to at- tract back to. the Co-op those members who feel aggrieved. In closing, may I impart to you a little bit of history on the Co-op movement in Terrace as told to me by my father, Charles Kofoed, who was one of the Charter Members of the Co-op. At a directors’ meeting, one of the directors embarked on a long disparaging tirade against ‘unions and of a particular dis- pute that was taking place in Terrace at the time. When he was finished, he was promptly told that if it wasn’t for decent, hard-fought-for union wages and support from those same union workers, the Co-op would cease to exist. Unfortunately, if ‘the same director were to make the same speech today, the other directors would make him chair- man of the board. How times have changed and, in my opin- ion, not for the better. George Kofoed, Terrace, B.C. _.and the Labour Council adds a response as well To the Editor; Recent ads placed in your paper by ‘‘concerned members of the Terrace Co-op’’ begs a response to correct misinfor- mation given. The people that you see around the Co-op on weekends handing out information are not, as the ads suggest, anar- chists doing their dirty deed. They are dedicated, ordinary workers carrying out decisions that are unanimously decided by all delegates to the Kitimat- Terrace and District Labour Council in the hope that the Co- op board of directors will see the light. This appears to be unlikely, considering that representatives from the Labour Council met with the board of directors in mid-December in an effort to reach a solutio:: the Labour Council was turned down. We asked for the following: 1, That the Co-op board and management would not interfere in efforts by council affiliates to organize Kermodei’s workers. 2, That the Co-op board would not interfere with the council’s efforts: should. an at- tempt to organize Co-op workers. and staff be under- taken. We were simply as! ‘1g the board on these two issue. (0 abide by the law. 3. That the board would, as they have prior to this job, use building trades members on future renovations. We ack- nowledged to them that this board could not commit future boards and considering that ma- jor renovations would not take place for many years to come, we did not consider than an out- tageous suggestion. The board turned down all three requests, leaving us with no alternative other than to con- ‘ tinue with our campaign. That the board would not ac- cept a proposal, which for all in- tents and purposes was a face- saving device for all concerned, boggles the mind. We hope that it is a question of the board disliking unions so much that they would not agree to anything, rather than them not caring for the future of an organization that has put trust in their judgement and common sense. _ John Jensen, 5 Ist Vice President, ws .Kitimat-Terrace District Labour Council. |