He a Tories to pick leader Sept. 9 |s it a sham battle? By PHYLLIS CLARKE LOSE to 2,500 delegates are expected now at the Con- servative Party convention scheduled for next week in To- ronto. They have before them the task of choosing a new leader for their party — one whom they hope can again lead them to victory. The nine aspirants for the po- sition have been roaring back and forth across this country, exhorting, urging, pleading, that they be the one selected. Lurking in the wings is the “Old Chief.” It could very well be that contrary to all the ex- pectation, John will say he’s in the race and where that will leave the contest is anybody’s guess. Diefenbaker has always been a mavarick in the party— that’s what earned him so much hatred in the eastern party cir- cles—and he’s not a man to be written off, or to write himself off very easily. The only “assurance” really that he’s not planning to throw in the old campaign hat is that his strongest supporter, Alvin Hamilton, has got into the fray. The story is that Hamilton would never have taken the plunge un- less he knew for sure that Dief- enbaker didn’t want the mantle any more. There are those who say that it’s all a sham battle. And to come extent that’s true. There are those who have gone into the fight purely and simply to show how much strength they have and thus ensure for them- resins position in any future Conservative cabinet. But it would be wrong to think of the Conservative party as a monolith. As a matter of fact ever since 1963 when Dief- enebaker lost his second cam- paign, the cleavage between the Ontario Bay Street crowd and the western sections of the party have become more and more pronounced. One new factor at this time is the stronger representation coming from Quebec who will have 23 percent of the voting strength. This alone guarantees that the question of ‘the candi- dates’ stand on the future rela- tions of French and English Canada will play a decisive role in the proceedings. The Thinkers conference at Montmorency Falls had pro- posed the writing of a new con- stitution. This constitution which should recognize that U.A.W. in By WILLIAM ALLAN DETROIT OMETHING new has occured in the midst of negotia- tions between the United Auto Workers and _ General Motors, Ford, Chrysler—Emil Mazey, secretary-treasurer of the union has plunged into a Vietnam peace campaign. He is helping to circulate petitions, throughout the nation that calls on President Johnson to end the Vietnam war. The sponsors of the new movement call them- selves Negotiations Now. They seek a million signatures to present to Johnson. “I’m spending most of my o time on bargaining,” Mazey told Canada is-composed of two na- tions should be, they said, “such as to permit and encourage their full harmonious growth-and de- velopment in equality through-. out Canada.” Not unrelated is the question of the Union Nationale, and where its support will go. There are many indications that Pre- mier Johnson has given the nod to Duff Roblin, Manitoba Pre- mier and front runner in the leadership race. That’s one reason there is such a flutter around the Stan- Lurking in the wings is the | ‘Old Chief.’ It could very well be that contrary to all the expectations, John will say he’s in the race. Where that will leave the contest is | | anybody's guess. His obvi- ous disfavor on Bay Street has to be measured against his still popular image in the West. = : field campaign since the story goes that he had planned to press . his campaign without Quebec. Now Robert Stanfield, Nova Scotia’s premier, is mak- ing sure that he talks about the rights of French Canadians everywhere he goes. This, it is said, is causing some disquiet back in his home province. The most non-Thinker of all the candidates is Senator Wal- lace McCutcheon. Ever since the Montmorency gathering he has been blasting it. Long known for his adherence to right-wing views, to greater Canadian “in- tegration” with the United States, McCutcheon is not re- garded as having a chance at the leadership but large support could ensure him an important role in all future Conservative planning. There should be no illusions that if that is the case there will be a strong swing to the right. He, along with particularly Donald Fleming, former finance minister, is an advocate of some form of unity with Social Credit —perhaps the sort of alliance that would give Social Credit backing at the provincial level while they stay out of the fede- ral field. The attack on social service measures, on fiscal re- form, also forms part of this pattern and is quite discernable in the campaigns of these men. The other question yet not answered is where will the westerners place their support— on Alvin Hamilton, regarded as the left bower of the Conserva- tive Party or Duff Rublin. Tra- ditionally it is the western sec- tion of the party that is the more progressive (it was from there that the Progressive got added to the name), and today the main federal seats are held in the west so they have more strength than might otherwise be expected. Hamilton from the left as McCutcheon from the right might just be in there to guar- antee his future position but Rublin was wooed by many to get into the fray and his com- mitment to the federal field, as with Stanfield, indicates a very serious campaigner. He has a number of things going for him, his western base, his expected support from Quebec, the fact that he is not part of the old federal cabinet and so does not have to answer for any com- plaints of what was done in the last number of years. ’ The enthusiasm that greeted his announcement that he was running in the eastern conser- vative newspapers might indi- cate that he’s the man that the the Bay Street boys see as their choice. However, there is no doubt-that when it comes to who will be the best man for Bay Street, George Hees probably still is the front runner. Co- chairman of the convention Eddie Goodman is known as a strong Hees supporter. His ra- ther fading glamour though and obvious aging playboy manner runs against the expectation of his winning. But that gets us back to the nagging question: what if Dief- enbaker gets in there too? His obvious disfavor on Bay Street has to be measured against his still popular image in the west and even if he’s not in as a can- didate himself can his influence again keep the Bay Street crowd from getting their way? The final act opens at Maple Leaf Gardens on Sept. 6th. Vietnam peace fight us, “but I believe peace is the number one issue in the country. “I happen to believe that if this war spreads to China or turns into a nuclear war, we can kiss our (auto) negotiations goodbye. Government agencies will impose wage controls and destroy collective bargaining as we know it—so there really is a relationship.” Asked if this meant that the UAW might refuse to support President Johnson in the 1968 election or throw its support te a peace candidate, Mazey said. “We haven’t made a decision about this yet.” Mazey said that while the UAW: membership might not share his position on the peace issue, that the leadership did. With Mazey playing an offi- cial role in seeking one million signatures for Negotiations Now in Vietnam, by Oct: 1, it means that the UAW will officially, through its locals and other media, publicize and aid the campaign. The Michigan State Fair, which attracts, thousands each day, is to be a special target with teams of signature collec- tors covering it. Already the prestige of the UAW being involved has sent TV interviewers out to Solidar- ity House to place Mazey on TV and him saying that war and the collective bargaining in the Big 3 are inseparable. CCORDING to Donald Mac- Donald, secretary treasurer of the Canadian Labor Con- gress, trade union membership stands at an all time high in Canada and “prospects for con- tinued growth are exceedingly good.” In a Labor Day message, Mac- Donald noted that: ‘Outside the established trade union move- ment there has been an enor- mous surge of interest in collec- tive bargaining among many pro- fessional and semi-professional groups. The practice of bargain- ing collectively, which has al- ways formed the basis of the trade union movement, is now being widely accepted. The signi- ficance of this development is one of the important situations now confronting the trade union movement. “These circumstances clearly prove the fallacy of those who, only a short time ago, were pre- dicting the demise of the labor movement. It is now quite ob- vious that not only is our move- ment going to remain, and con- tinue to increase in numbers and strength, but it is going to play Must resist complacency “PTVHE labor movement must resist the temptation to sink into complacency about the solutions we have won to yesterday’s problems.” said Larry Sefton, director of district six of the United Steel- workers of America, in a Labor Day statement. Pointing out the problems of our urban society, Sefton stated: “We must not stand by and watch our cities, in which most of our members live, collapse into piles of rubble and junk, crowded with a demoralized humanity. This is no question of one real estate development or another. The desperate need is for the application of suffi- cient resources—financial, social and human—to re-build our cities as centres for the enrich- ment and ennoblement of human life, not for its deprivation and degradation. We in the labor movement must encourage this to be done—must urge that this be done—must insist that this be done. “Nor can we in the labor Traditional parades will mark Labor Day- Union membershih at all time high in the” a more important role } ciety of the fe i intin : ae ie Oe segaomic and ff nizational fronts labor in the past Donald noted: much-needed various forms tion, we have bee®i with intensive drives™ duce legislation of # would seriously 4a™ lective bargaining hamper workers 18 of their. right to h a functioning organiZi “Tt is obvious, toh concluded, “that gt@#= confront the 1abo! and the Canadian uni whole. A strong 4! rel movement isn g than ever. re should be an occasion unionists to Te" selves to continuing the great traditions plishments whic tage.” age ) » pe added movement, u shing and, permit T Z in the hands of o f centrated corpors dehumanize us e f “The crisis of 3? the midst of plenty upon us—witnes? mom employment rates Z people and- anot of | vantaged. The cris soc! little meaning 1” nai ren and authoritar us atmosphere is “ ial ¥ ma’ witness the } the outpouring © g the picket lines act? “We must insis iy sources of our i. that ted to tasks 1° i Pe | the re-building, the of yr, Oo of our urban Wi) wal end of poverty 9 rational ap bution of our We through educati reation, philosoP of 2 gut ful expressions none ; spirit in our Mm? y id. Be in our moderh we a