Oe tober AC 1972 fang ity Apargient Sesidential) but not in use for chose purposes to RS-1 (One-Famlly Hesidential) and to desinnate §11 the property so affected as Develonnent reas pursuant to Section 702Afof the Municipal Act. ‘Notion to tabla fl day, Ade T/ dae #1293 not passed Seconded by Miderran labbete: That fdrther consideration of By~lawfiio. 1293 be tabled for a of two woots| Defeate Alderrfen Laking and “fabbett vored if favour of the resolutio Prior to defeat of the abovernoted résolution, Alderman Laking stated he felt thrth furcher public mectin~ should be hald as there appeated to baa sreat ddal of mbunderstanding on the part of the residents con erncd with resnéct ito the effeet the proposed refonine would have on thei pro=- pertzs. Alddrran tIKabbett referred to the ortheening meeatins of thé Lower Mainland Nunfcipal Association when the subject of Land Use Contracts will be discussed] and stated he felt it would fe very beneficial if onefof the said residengs could attend. Alderman Laking advised he would inquire whether or ndt fit would be possible to havé an outside observer prefent at the meetidg. Alderman Thompson then sp ke against the tabling nbtion, stating he fqlt that the residents concernéd are well aware of the ¢ircum- stances invo}ved in the proposed rezoning. . = Sake ° Zon.Anend.B/law Moved by Aldgrman Thompson: _ £1203 abandoned eas Seconded by Alderman Rancer: That the "City of Port Coquitlam Zoning By-law, 1969, No. 918 o>: ment By-law, {1972, No. 1203" be abandoned. Carried Subdiv. Amend. Moved _bv Aldgrman Rancer: B/law #1205-fin. pass.& adoption Seconded bv Alderman Lakine: That MPray No. 1205 be reconsideral finally passed and ay: . , Carri ‘ NEW BUSINESS: Pre iee ie BES Sr.Blds.Insp.re % From the Senior Euiiding Inspector, September 29th, 1972 referring housesoving- 3550 Carlisle to to a house that it is proposed to move from 3550 Carlisle Street to 2426 2426 Patricia Patricia Avenue, advising that the new assetsed value of the dwelling if brought to N.H.A. minimum standards will conform to within $10.00 of the City's Bylaw requirements, and that it is intended to have the normal $500.00 bond posted on the house-moving application, which will be refunded on corpletion of the dwelling. Alderman Ranger inquired whether the $500.00 bond was the amount sta~ ted in the resolution passed at a previous Council meeting approving the proposed re-location of the dwelling, and the City Clerk advised the