ae RT CL ie A RY ot Mie ets Del Ma Ree ee a: ; 8 a : — .TO THE TERRACE STANDARD Free ride a myth | - Dear Sirs . Re: Letter titled “An unjustified Picture”? ~ in the Aug. 15, 1990 i issue, Your letter encourages me to begin by saying ‘that I’m proud to. bea Nisga’a Indian, but em- Darrassed to be a Canadian. ‘I’m appalled at your lack of knowledge about Indians 1 in general, and your discriminatory at- titude. _ | First of all, taxes are not the concern of the Native Indians, these are levied by the govern- ment, and they spent these on a lot of other things besides Indians. I pay taxes on the goods that I purchase when E come to town to shop, as do many of our people who patronize your local businesses. If you don’t want us here, perhaps we can take our business elsewhere where it is ap- preciated, As for your comments on the Post Secondary ‘sponsorship for eight years. This is entirely un- true, Go to your local Indian Affairs branch and find out what their policies are, and you will see enn ctly how the government works, I'm not sur- prised that they haven't countered this claim, because they probably can’t decide which of their many-employees are responsible for writing let- ters of response to claims of this nature. I graduated from UBC in 1980 after five years of meager sponsorship, which went to pay for * tuitibn and housing. My children were with me, and I had to apply for a Canada Student Loan to help me out, which I am Still paying for. Mind you, I?m grateful for the sponsorship, but I can still recall the’ struggles I experienced as a Native Indian attending University. It was a struggle against a system, and the hurdles after each suc- cess ful year got more and more difficult to over- The. attitude of the University population sh ig have been-free of any prejudice. In reali- ty, discrimination. was alive and well in the enlightened, knowledgeable community which trains people to be teachers, lawyers, doctors, engineers, etc. Imagine how many people have been influenced in these classrooms by some of the educators who made negative comments about Native Indians. Mind you, we witnessed ‘these in the years 1975-1980. Perhaps things have changed since then? The special training programs and oppor- tunities do not necessarily lead to jobs, as you can tell by the numbers of unemployed Native Indian people in Canadian Society. Don't be so naive! Some employers do. not’ have such generous liberal views of Indians as some might like to think. I’m fed up with discrimination. and I'm fighting it through my job as a teacher, and through local yolunteer work. [ want my children to live in a better atmosphere than the one I ex- perienced, How many of your childreri have been ridiculed or attacked on a public street? My two innocent girls ages 4 and 9 were walking down University Village with me one day on our way to the library, when and. old non-Indian lady at- tacked them verbally and grabbed my youngest, I was appalled and thoroughly disgusted, I told her to leave my children alone. She ranted and raved about Indians and acted crazy. My children were frightened and they can still remember this incident to this day, I am employed full time with good pay, but I cannot get loans at banks, so [ get them at high interest finance companies. Many of our people get their loans from. these‘ places, I have no qualms about speculating the reasons for this. There are numerous prejudices that we en- counter on a daily basis. The Native Indian ' Peoples in this country share the same ex- periences even though. we live:in’ different pro- vinces and are from different tribes. I’ve been to- residential schools in Alberta and B.C. As a result I’ve been working towards changing socie- ty’s attitudes so that our children do not have to suffer through the painful ordeals that we all ex- perienced. The movement for change has been quiet but painfully slow. Our wealth is our culture, not money. Now we have little of both, Our culture was taken away from us at residential schools and our lands: stolen by the ‘non-Indian government. ‘These lands we are claiming belong to us and they were supposed to be held in trust for us, but they were ‘sold and given away without our knowledge or ' consent. If we were rich with money we wouldn't have the time or the inclination to put up road blockades. ; cont'd A8: Blockades are no joke ~ pear sai | ‘ With reference to the letter. "This game playing must © itop” by BIll Homburg of Terrace, B.C. in your August : 15, 1990 newspaper. + | What ‘the’ Canadian + aboriginal people are doing is ‘not a laughing matter, and ‘ sitould not and is not taken ‘lightly. Someone sitting in « Terrace can have a complete- oly. different view on -., blockades and issues concer- “ning Canada’s Native In- dlans. r ~. His comments on marxist, leftist, red propaganda, apartheld:and nalve conser- oo: Vative governments, sounds ‘like the riligious colonialism -and fanaticism which the ° missionssies used on the a aborigianal people 100 years 3 go, | \ They: came disguised as |» savers’? and were successful “in stripping the Native In- ~ dlans of their dignity and self esteem. The Native Indian * People: were “brainwashed'’ “into ‘believing {heir tradi- , tions; culture and what (hey - owned, was “‘heathenism’*. -, When the Queen or other iv digaitaries come to Canada, . - the Native Indians are invited . to epme out in thelr dancing andi chiefs’ attire with thelr a totem poles and made to put _ > om /a. show as 3 Canadian : culture, |. The government of ada tried to put the ; Native Indian people in its: .. qloset one year. The Queen, ” when she was not greeted by eltizens of our nation’. A true chief who believes in his traditions and culture does not allow anyone to wear his chiefs attire for any reason, or touch it. This gar- ment is sacred. At certain blockades set up to try to save the land from clear-cut logging, we find out who Is with us and against us. We lived with discrimina- tion long enough not to care’ who is against ‘us. The writer says ‘‘to. go back and live off the land.”’ Qur grandparents and parents taught us how to sur- vive in the wilderness and live off the land. We can do it. Come with us to the clear-cut logging areas in our moun- tains where you are readily sending us back and see for yourself where the animals, birds, fish, berries. and medicine and other plant foods used to be, and the behavior of wildlife today, They too, have no place to go. | Our drinking water and rivers are polluied, but we are not allowed to mention these things. If we do, we are made to look confused and dumb and probably Listed In a black book, and classed as militant. This is where treating them differently comes in, Our older genera- tion and some of us today, were made to be embarrassed and timid by Christianity, of our race, tradition and culture. : The aboriginal people did to keep us out of sight ‘and out of mind, The Europeans : forgot about the Native In- dian People when they struck gold, dropped their survey Instruments and rushed to the gold fields. We were still here when you all got back and some of you came back broke. The Jand today is stripped, we are here, and we will still be here . When everything is gone and you will all go away with your money for awhile. or retire somewhere else. You _ tell me, which one of us is the mest greedy? Do not criticize anyone unless you have walked a mile in their moccasins. Signed, M.G. Dalen Cedarvale, B.C. Dear sir: As residents a Hazelton area, we are deeply. concerned over forestry and’ - land use policies that involve overcutting, clearcutting, use of hazardous chemicals, « damage to fish and wildlife . .... ~ habitat, and destruction of the natural beauty ‘af: our. own human habitat.:-, 6° Because of the close ‘con nection between environmen- tal issues and the issues of the ° First Nations’ land title ac- tion, we wish to express our | support for the Native road. blockades in this area and throughout Canada. of. the on Terrace Standard, Wednesday, August 29, 1980 — Page A AS | ‘We understand the hard- oe ships’ and upset caused by . loss of income by loggers and ’ pther workers who have been ' affected by the blockades, ’ However, if the environmen- tal deterioration that is tak- ing place under present Jand use policies is allowed to con-. - tinue, a few years down the > ‘road we-will all be faced not ~ ‘only with loss of income, but “also with loss of the natural ' resources and environment that make Canada unique, We urge the government, banks and forest industry to start now to devise ways to protect individual workers * LAND CLAIMS | The debate: f continues Support common cause - “from hardship while chang- : ing over tO a. more. sus-. tainable economy. . To address these concérns, a Three Rivers Environmen- tal Education Society is being formed, and will hold.:a-- meeting on Sunday, Sept. 9. For more information, peo- ro ela i a ple are invited to phone "842-5109, Sincerely, - . Geoff. ‘Watling, Brad Red- _ dekopp, Geneva Hagen, Al | Don. G.G.. McKeown, | Brady, Jim Hagen, Monet, Robert Melvin, Robert Ar- -thur, Carolyn, Himmelright, ; Meshell] | Melvin, Maggie Carew. Caril Chasens, Read and learn Dear Sir: In response to letters you recently published from ' Mary. Holland, Jack Davis . (MLA), Howard Ennis and _ Bill Homburg: I suggest they read more about ‘aboriginal ', Kights. With that in mind, I offer’ the ‘following excerpt ‘from(Drumbeat) ‘by Boyce Richardson. —_- “The ghost of the former governor of the colony of B.C., Joseph Trutch, con- tinties to materialize through Statements of B.C.’s politi- cians. Thus it was possible for Allan Williams, the At- torney General of the newly elected Socred government, to say in 1975, “Just because a bunch of Indians wandered up and down the Rocky Mountain trench for a few hundred years does not mean they own it.” In nearly 200 years of con- | tact, Indian people have learned more about the white man, than the white man has learned from the Indians. The above statement conveys both ignorance and contempt for the original people of The responsibility for bridging this cultural ig- norance lies partly with the Indian people — we have made efforts to do this. But an equal and greater respon- sibility fies with. the non- Indian society, and its leaders. Indian people have learned more about the white man than the - white man has learned from the Indians. NATIVE, BLOCKADES have prompted mixed reactions from those The Chiefs have strong im- peratives for immediate ac- tion. On each visit to their territories they see the ac- celerating rate of clear cut logging, the widespread use of chemical pesticide on farms and forests, the water pollution from open pit mines and are well aware of the threat posed by hydro- electric dams in their salmon rivers. At the same time, their exercise of jurisdiction of the territory and the river fishing sites faces mounting harassment from fisheries of- ficers and conservation of- ficers. Most of all the chiefs are anxious to ensure that the future of their children and grandchildren are not con- sumed by alcohol, drugs, violence, family breakdown and a whole host of social ills that affect societies denied self determination and self- respect. The need for immediate action has not blinded the chiefs to the need for thoughtful implementation. Long before European col- onization the Indian tribes’ shared histories. Although each society, was distinct, they shared a common view. ‘of how the world worked, Our oral histories record a dynamic culture with humerous migrations throughout the territory.. Each migrant .group :was:ex-: - pected -to understand. and- obey the laws of those who had arrived previously, and each added important new elements to society and the culture. With this history in mind we have watched with in- terest the emergence of ‘Canadian Society over the ’ past 100 years. Nat only does _ it disrespect the society of the people originally here, but it forcibly prevents the Chiefs from obeying their own laws. They realize that a future based on our own Jaws and institutions will necessitate informed negotiations with the non-Indian people. Who the Chiefs will negotiate with and the framework for those discus- sions have not been deter- mined. It is difficult to know what the outcome of this will be. We realize all people’ within Canada are bound together in a complex, rapid- ly changing world. We think our traditions and the cultures we have inherited have much to say that is of value to others as we all try to deal with the forces of change. We know from bitter ex- perience that others do not know what is best for us. We are in‘a fight we will never give up. A fight to implement the policies we know will help us lift ourselves from our present problems. We hope for and welcome the support of other people in Canada in that struggle.’’ = the Native Indians during 2 == mot invent reserves. The ed ir social and economic systems . Thank you, i visit to Canada, made 2 point Europeans saw the richness —_ USIng northwestern highways. But, judging fram the number oflet- —_ were interwoven with those Deborah Morrison-. -"'@f mentioning the Aboriginal - of this land and they had to —_—‘ters from readers, they have also focused public attention on the © of the people around as, Hayward, ” _, People of Canada as “Firat do something with the people = entiré question of land claims and aboriginal title, through. family ties and Kitimat, B.C, . Dear Sir; ‘starting in high school. can label a fellow native Canadian racist from long ago. Status Indians, with so many benefits, ; demand so much — they demand land © and compensation from non-Indians for: any profits made from living on the land, * past, present and future. If ‘what's ours 3 is theirs and what's theirs is ours’ then” we must demand that all benefits previously received by Indians, including ie payments for self. government-; and ©: Department of Indians Affairs, be. Meducted from ‘any of their: future at * payments, All benefits must. ” ry or prejudice while staging ‘‘all Native In- dian soccer tournaments” or sporting baseball caps that read, “Thank God I'm an Indian'’? ; _ When crossing © the : US: /Canadian border, we must pay duty: on: thé ‘ther- ‘chandise purchased — a’status native In- dian does not. Native Indians are con- cerned about stripping the land of its resources while it is these: resources: that .. put’bread on all our tables, = 2 Why is it you may ask, that we'v When starting a business, native Cana- _,dians must almost use everything owned -@8 collateral to receive government fun- ding for.a business, while native Indians can obtaiti government grantsto begin a business’ (if it is 51% owned by status. native Indians) and the loan will be ‘forgotten’? if payments are made for a certain amount of time. To own a home, usually both husband “and wife in a native Canadian family In Webster's Dictionary, a definition of native is; ‘*being the place or environ- ment in which a person was born or a | thing came into, being! ' one’, ‘Ss -native at land. As someone. who'was born’ and ~ ralsed in Canada, I think of myself as a native Canadian. Why is it then that a native Canadian’ must pay for medical plan coverage while “native Indians receive not only free medical ‘and dental : , . for life, but also free prescriptions: and © - Optical costs? ‘-work..to’ pay the mortgage... and heard so very little.on these issues from’ — let them earn their equality’ A native Canadian must prove that he: housekeeping payments, whilé a status “the: non-Indians in'the.pagt? Ifthe os or she has worked and pald taxes before” ‘native Indian can receive free land and government had formed an otganization . Sincerely, : _ otte'ls eligible for a student loan, while . subsidized housing. called the “‘Department.of Non-native —_T. Riley. whe, native Indians are paid to go to school, © Affairs,” we would. ‘have been’ heard __ S.Hazelton. vies sp eat Why is it that a status native. Indian LS PR RE cece TET ORY NO As Tome 2 tet i eal pe may am cp ee eae eh ene fen ie Cee ete Tee eer nec 1 . s, ‘ a hasiotsi) Sig biecdR ached elie RRMA EE re eT rors tLe te ha ie i a TE CER MA wart chntmeem ae aren Py Ime aeat te)