EDITORIAL Canada at crossroads The Special Joint Senate-House Committee on Canada’s International Relations, a 17-member body, ___ began its work July 15 in Halifax and will end its hearings in Winnipeg August 2. Its task is to study Canadian response to the Green Paper on foreign policy titled: “Competitiveness and Security: Directions for Canada’s International Rela- tions.” The first phase of the committee’s work is to bring in a report by Aug. 23 on two key issues — free trade with the U.S. and our participation in Reagan’s Star Wars plan. In official language, the two issues are called, “Canada’s participation in research on Stra- tegic Defence Initiative and Bilateral Trade with the United States.” The Green Paper itself, a 43-page document, clearly indicates the direction the right-wing Mulroney government wants to go. Parading itself as an objec- tive overview, the paper’s premise is based on two not-so-new pillars. The first is that Canada’s economic future is inex- orably tied to that of the U.S., that the United States is a dynamic economic motor moving into “new areas of high technology”. Figures are provided which show that 75 per cent of Canada’s exports go south, that 80 per cent of all foreign investments here are American; that U.S. companies control 58 per cent of our oil and gas. Other data deals with our cultural and military ties. The second premise is shop-worn anti-Sovietism. “The U.S. is the principal member of the NATO alliance. . the guarantor of the security of the Western democracies.” It describes NATO in glowing terms, the USSR as an expansionist, antagonistic threat to Canadian security and to our “traditional democratic values.” The USSR is clearly blamed for the arms race now underway, while Reagan’s policies escape unscathed. Grenada and Nicaragua, for example, are not menti- oned in the short section on the Caribbean. In short, the Green Paper’s thrust is to continue and accelerate Canadian economic, political and military ties with the United States — a dangerous and suici- dal choice. Faced with a negative public reaction both to Star Wars participation and the free trade option, the Tories may well mobilize every voice in their favor to “prove” Canadians support their policy direction. There have already been indications that certain busi- ness sectors, for example, are touting SDI participa- tion as a “job creation” bonanza — and Canada could well find itself involved “unofficially”, but involved. The Special Committee should hear the real voice of the Canadian people — the millions who oppose Star Wars, cruise testing and rapid absorption of our military into U.S. “first strike” plans. It should receive the arguments against free trade which would further reduce our economic independence, destroy our industrial and manufacturing base with the corres- ponding loss of jobs. The battle is on for Canadian independence in new, sharp terms. Our country is truly at a crossroad. A people-vs-profits case “Freedom,” it appears, is a word with many mean- ings. Two court challenges are underway, both under the guise of freedom. One is a challenge brought by the Canadian Medical Association alleging that federal legislation which penalizes provinces that permit doc- tors to extra bill violates the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This one is being launched in the Supreme Court of Ontario, a province which loses $4.4 million each month in federal medicare payments so that doctors can bilk patients. The CMA says its action is to defend the professional and economic freedom of the indi- vidual. A second court action, also using the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, aims at setting the workplace back to the 19th century. This group, a coalition of anti-union and business people, well-financed and connected has chosen the name “Freedom of Choice.” It, too, professes nothing but “freedom” as it chal- lenges compulsory union membership, payment of dues and union bargaining. Its aim is the open shop, unfettered exploitation and a “completely free market place.” This is a good time to re-raise the need for a Bill of Rights for Labor which would include the right to a job, the unhampered right to strike and to picket, the right to bargain collectively on all matters affecting workers — from wages and working conditions to tech change and so-called “management rights.” It’s a clear-cut people-versus-profits issue. HAVE AN ICE DAY \) * + “ YES GEORGE, I DID HAVE A LOOK AT THAT GREEN PAPER ON CANADIAN FOREIGN POLICY --GOOD READING!--- NOW HAVE THE BOYS IN THE PENTAGON DRAFT UP THEIR RESPONSE TO OUR STAR WARS PROPOSAL.” Profiteer of the week All the guys down at Domtar Ltd., who had been joining the chorus of blues about the terrible state of the forest industry and pulp prices, were silent this week when the company reported profits of $47,500,000 for the first six months of 1985, compared with $44,800,000 a year earlier. Editor — SEAN GRIFFIN Assistant Editor — DAN KEETON Graphics — ANGELA KENYON Published weekly at 2681 East Hastings Street Vancouver, B.C. V5K 1Z5 Phone (604) 251-1186 Foreign — $20 one year: Second class mail registration number 1560 ___ TRIBUNE Business & Circulation Manager — PAT O'CONNOR Subscription Rate: Canada — $14 one year; $8 six months t was less than a year ago that the editor- ial columns of the two major dailies and the Nanaimo Free Press were full of con- demnation for the province’s trade union Movement for its role in convincing members of Local 712 of the Ironworkers to reject a sweetheart deal with AMCA International that would have cut wages and conditions substantially on a fabricat- Point. Remember it all? Columnists edi- torially shook their heads, claiming that unionists were refusing to accept the “real- ities of the marketplace.” They were giving up valuable jobs because AMCA would simply take its project to the U.S. where Wages were “more competitive.” Of course the whole thing was a scam from the beginning. As the B.C. Federa- tion of Labor and the local labor council Pointed out, there never were more than a few jobs at stake. There certainly were no guarantees Duke Point would get the pro- Jéct at any wage level. And then in March _Of this year, the Nanaimo Free Press went to Everett, Washington to examine another similar project and found that the company was not getting any bargains on Wages. Much to the Free Press’ delega- Uon’s surprise, it was paying the going rate according to the standard union agree- ments. Now there is another brief chapter to add to that series of events. It turns out that wages in the construction industry in S province are very competitive com- Pared to those in the U.S. — often with- Out taking into account the favorable ing plant to be set up at Nanaimo’s Duke ° People and Issues exchange rate. And the source for that information is about as eminent as they come for the business establishment in this province — B.C. Business, which in turn got its figures from B.C. Central Credit Union. The July, 1985 issue of the magazine published a survey of wages for carpen- ters, electricians and laborers for seven Canadian cities, including Vancouver, as well as four U.S. cities. While a carpenter in Vancouver earns an average $22.91 per hour, his counter- part in Los Angeles earns U.S. $23.14, in Denver U.S. $20.56 and in Seattle, U.S. $19.56. When the figures are converted to Canadian funds for comparison, the dif- ferences are revealing with wages averag- ing $30.72 an hour in Los Angeles, $27.29 in Denver and $26.09 in Seattle. Of the cities surveyed, only Minneapolis consistently comes up with lower rates than Vancouver and the difference for carpenters is only 87 cents Canadian. The disparity is even more striking in the case of electricians and laborers who all earn more than their Vancouver coun- terparts in equivalent Canadian funds except in Denver where laborers earn some $3.30 less an hour. In Los Angeles, electricians get some $37.99 an hour Can- adian and laborers $28.71. In Seattle the same two trades earn $29 and $24.41 respectively. * * * ocred Health Minister Jim Neilson’s comment earlier this month that overcrowding in hosptal emergency wards and bed closures during the summer are both “routine” practices was callous enough. But when you stack that com- ment up against the actual numbers of bed closures it demonstrates pretty clearly the Socreds’ chainsaw approach to health care. The St. Paul’s Hospital unit of the Hos- pital Employees Union just affiliated its members to the Vancouver and District Labor Council this week — just in time for unit chair Fred Muzin to tell delegates of the cuts to that facility planned by the government. In previous years, he said the budget constraints would force the hospi- tal to close about 40 of St. Paul’s 550 beds — a figure which, although it would undoubtedly cause hardship, might be considered “routine.” But this August, St. Paul’s will be clos- ing 283 beds — more than half the total. Elective surgery will be cancelled. What worries the HEU — and any- body concerned about health care in this province — is that the Socreds will, in fact, attempt to make such closures “‘rou- tine.” Said Muzin: ““We’re concerned that the government is trying to use us as a permanent budget control measure for G2 * * * le were saddened to hear this week of the passing of long time Tribune supporter Henry Traeger whose name had long been associated with the progressive movement in Chilliwack. Yvonne Hadvick paid tribute to him at a memorial service held July 11. Born in Berlin, Germany in 1910, he immigrated to this country with his family at the age of 17 and settled with them in Northern Alberta where he began work as a rural postman. With the opening of the mining indus- try in the early war years, he became a miner, following the work across the pro- vince to mines in Silverton, Kimberly, Bri- tannia Beach and Hope together with his wife Christine and his five children. He was ‘a member of the Mine Mill and Smeiter Workers Union and later the Steelworkers until his retirement in 1975. He was also a member of the Commu- nist Party throughout his working life, maintaining his activity in the Fraser Val- ley branch until his health compelled him to cut back in later years. In 1984, he was also able to see the embodiment of his beliefs during a trip to his native Berlin, now part of the German Democratic Republic and transformed by * ; ‘ ‘ PG a aa PACIFIC TRIBUNE, JULY 24, 1985 e 3