A march for peace T he thunder of marching feet and the beat of stout hearts from well over forty nations and from hundreds of the world’s great cities, will echo from mighty demon- strations demanding an end to the U.S. war in Vietnam, on this coming weekend, March 25-26 27. In Canada the March for Peace in Vietnam will take place in every principle city from Halifax to Vancouver, in demonstrations that should drive home the reality to the Pearson-Martin government apologists and covert sup- porters of U.S. aggression in Vietnam that they do not, and have not spoken for the Canadian people on this vital issue of human survival—and that it is now time that they did. Not only since the beginning of U-S. interference in the internal affairs of Vietnam, but since early in 1965 when the U.S. began its wanton escalation of death and destruction nam and the rapid bombing of North Viet- upon the people of South Vietnam, aided in this wanton butchery by other foreign mercenary troops from Austra- lia, New Zealand, Korea, etc., the government of Canada has remained silent. As destructive of peace as its silence, the Pearson gov- ernment, fully supported by t he Tories in this, have made pretentious gestures for “peace” behind its membership in the 1954 Geneva Agreement which established the Inter- national Control Commission (ICC). Through the media of this ICC membership the Cana dian government has not only never once voiced its indig- nation against escalating U.S. Hitlerite atrocities in Viet- nam, but has actually utilized its membership on the ICC to give “moral” sanction to U.S.horror and genocide upon the people of Vietnam. But the tide is turning. In the U.S. itself great waves of public indignation and opposition against the Pentagon war vultures is rising. “Sit-ins”, “‘teach-ins”’, intellectuals, senators, university faculties, churches, trade unionists, Communists, all are fusing into one mighty tidal wave of opposition to U.S. foreign policy and its poisonous fruit in Vietnam — the apogee of its criminal insanity and bank- ruptcy. And so on March 26 the people of Canada, from all walks of life, shoulder to shoulder with their brothers and sisters of America, and with the courageous and peace lov- ing peo EES Tom McEWEN wo famous characters who used to dominate Chicago’s civic politics in that city’s hey- day of graft, corruption and gen- eral boondoggling were John Coughlin, better known in polit- ical and underworld circles as *Bathhouse John,” and his bosom colleague Michael Kenna, as “Hinky Dink.” When public criticisig and con- cern got too hot, as it frequently did in the realm of civic taxes, corrupt franchises, crooked reai estate deals or other social de- fects in the hub city of Illinois, #Bathhouse John” and “Hinky Dink” perfected a sure-fire formula to meet all situations of that sort. “If the taxpayers squawk too much on oneissue... hit them with something some- where else!” For ‘*Bathhouse John” and : “Hinky Dink” this formula had = worked to perfection for nearly ples of other lands, will claim the streets to—March for Peace in Vietnam—NOW! The history of those hectic years is well cata- logued in a classical literary half a century. work entitled, “Lords Of The Levee® by authors Wendt and Kogan, For those who live in this “dynamic” domain of Socredia and its reflection in civic affairs, it is not entirely essential to read this book in order to savor the Bathhouse—Hinky Dink form- ula, Fifty years or more later it is still highly functional as the principle “guideline’’ in Soc- red political skulduggery, seep- ing down to civic levels, Just recently, Trade and In- dustry Minister Loffmark de- clared that “man’s intrusion into the sex life of bugs will make it possible to rid whole areas of harmful and unwanted insects,’’ In this “learned” discourse on “The boys come marching home again. . ae A fateful decision Scheie to begin Wednesday of this week Parliament ‘d is expected to open its long-delayed debate on the re - tention or abolition of capital punishment. This debate will probably exceed the 3-day limit specified, unless of course outmoded ideas and superficial emotions outweigh sober evaluation of a barbaric custom. Many “polls” of one sort or another on this corroded issue have been conducted over the years, indicating a slow but gradual trend towards its abolition. A recent B.C. Corrections Association poll indicated a 64.3% in favor of abolition. Other polls throughout the country have reflect- ed like results, while still others have favored retention, indicating if anything, a persisting wide divergence of op- inion on this disturbing question. In Parliament every M.P. will be “free to vote as his conscience dictates”; that is, not tied by any partisan de- cree or consideration. Probing into their conscience and with all the sense of moral and human values their minds can command, it is to be hoped our M.P.’s come through the ordeal with a majority vote—showing Canada has attained the status of being civilized. the “sex life” of bugs, the min- ister attempts to “play down” the harmful effects of thousands of tons of poison sprayed around B.C, in the course of a year, and highly detrimental to all life, while at the same time getting in a plug for the bug- juice monopolists, whose annual profits almost equal the bugs, numerically speaking. This Socred “expert” on the “sex life” of bugs isalsoa strong advocate of a ‘‘customs union’ between B.C., Washington, Ore- gon, and California, with all other Canadian provinces, without re- gard to central government or to public opinion in exercising the same “right’’ to sell out their resources and independence to the highest U.S, bidder! The only difference in the application of the Bathhouse — Hinky Dink formula is Socred Loffmark’s ability to clothe it in more polite, more confusing, and less direct language, Another consistent patron of the Bathhouse—Hinky Dink form- ula is Socred Health Minister Eric Martin, While there is widespread and growing public criticism and concern onthe lack of provincial chronic-care hos- pital facilities, and the urgent need to take this service out of the hands of “free enterprisers’' and make it a public-owned gov- ernment responsibility, Health Minister Martin “hits them with something somewhere else;” viz, that all the criticism and con- cern about greater chronic-care hospital facilities comes from people who see their inheritances disappearing . . .next-of-kin who get angry because they see their .inheritances dwindling.” It may be said that while Bath- house and Hinky Dink, with all “their political and underworld associates clipped millions in graft and corruption from the citizenry of Chicago and environ- ment, aided by their unfailing Pactfie Editor — TOM McEWEN Associate Editor — Circulation Manager — JERRY SHACK Published weekly at Ford Bldg., Mezzanine No. 3, 193 E. Hastings St. Phone 685-5288 Subscription Rates: Canada, $5.00 one year; $2.75 for six months. North and South America and Commonwealth countries, $6.00 one year. All other countries, $7.00 one year. Authorized as second class mail by the Post Office Department, Ottawa, and for payment of postage in cash. ¥ We can only repeat that Charles DeGavlle has made his mark on the world scene and history will write it that wey. A man in his position, coming right out and calling NATO an American tectorate ther way of saying on American sfeoge—must shake most diplomats right down to their reots. He is saying that playing the stooge role might be good enough for Britain, West Germany, Turkey or Greece—but not for France and Charles DeGaulle. —ILWU President Harry Bridges in THE DISPATCHER, Mar. 4, '66 + African coal miners in Smith's Rhodesia have a lovely time . . . They are paid an average ten pounds a month (approximately $35.00) with two meals a day thrown in free if they sign on for a year’s contract. Not surprisingly that with such hand- some wages being paid out, the man who controls Rhodesia’s biggest colli- ery—the Wankie, which supplies the coal for Zambia’s copper industry—is a millionaire, one of the richest in South Africa, indeed in the whole world. He is Harry Oppenheimer, who alse controls about 60% of Zambia's copper production. The millionaires just can’t lose—can they? —The SCOTTISH MINER, February, 1966. + The Computer under pressure of try- ing to figure out a way of simultan- eously raising the living standards of people in one part of the world while _spending billions killing people on the other side, had a nervous breakdown, and is now under the care of an emin- — ent Viennese doctor. Meanwhile the war on poverty and the wer on Viet- nam are both bogged down. —Rae Murphy in SCAN, March, 1966. + There can be no doubt, however, thet given the present strength of the lebor movement, if it were united oround common objectives as ere the leaders of the monopolies, together we would be in a position to bring about profound changes and obtain substantial improvements in the con- ditions of the workers of our countries. —Benoit Frachon, General Secretary of the French CGT in TRADE UNION PRESS, Feb. '66. formula, they never managed to sink to the contemptable level exhibited by Socred Martin, What the minister is actually saying in his modernized version of the Bathhouse John*— Hinky Dink formula, is that the people of B.C, are more concerned about losing the “inheritance” bequests of their over-charged and suf- fering relatives, than in govern- ment provision of chronic-care facilities to ease the sufferings (and cost) of their last years. Compared with Martin's *re- vised” formula, Bathhouse and Hinky Dink were novices in the art of skinning and scandalizing the public, “Tribune MAURICE RUSH March 25, 1966—PACIFIC TRIBUNE—Page 4