Need is greater than ever for a fighting labor paper! Lift the Drive! Although the overwhelming majority of B.C.’s People voted against Social Credit, the Bennett regime has been returned with an increased majority. Despite the good fight waged by this Paper on all the key election issues, we were un- able to convince enough people that the Socreds Gre betraying our province. | In other words, now that the election is be- hind us, the major political task facing this news- Paper and everyone who supports its policies is to increase its influence — to bring it into many more hundreds of homes, mills and camps every week, That is why it is so vitally important that we Not only reach our target of 1750 subs, but go ver it. One heartening feature so far is that our Press Clubs have accepted quotas totalling 1853 Subs—well above our objective. Another is that We have already reached the one-third mark in our Paper Sales, with just two weeks gone in the Drive. But there are weak spots too. A glance at the table at the right will show you that most clubs have turned in very few subs, so far. Most of those that have come in were submitted by mail to us by our subscribers. Also, only 13 new readers were obtained during all of September. These two aspects of our work will have to be improved considerably if we are not to fail inthis most important campaign. Several hundred subs have expired in the last short period of time and many more hund- reds will be up for renewal during the next few Weeks. All Press Clubs have been supplied with the names of these subscribers. The job now is in the hands of the clubs and it is up to them to make sure that each and every reader of our Paper is visited during the drive. This is the only sure guarantee of success. UP-TO-DATE BOX SCORE e City—67 subs, 72 P/S. Total—139 Prov.—55 subs, 49 P/S. Total—104 , e Grand Total—243 subs in on 1750 @ Total New Subs=-13inon 250 _ | Sub Drive Quot ‘GREATER VANCOUVER — _ VANCOUVER ISLAND Club Quotas Achiev. Club Quotas _Achiev. Subs, P/S Subs P/S Subs .P/S Subs P/S Advance 25 15 . Alberni 40 10; 9 Bill Bennett 50 4 4 —. Campbell River 20 4 2s Broadway 70 15 13 ~4'! Cumberland 35 10 ; eee Frank Rogers 20 10 1 Cowichan 50 10 4 3 Georgia 10 103 Nanaimo 55 15 prey Kingsway 90 °2510#" 4 #— Parksville 5 pees Niilo Makela 10 2 ——— Victoria 50 25 es Olgin 955. 46 pA Saanich [Bigs | eeeek Bet roan ert ap = 2 i] Totals 265 S812" 44 anc. East 0 Spt |) South Vanc. 40 15 9 1 H PEneie Victory Square 30 eens he aneynop RS: ay PE West End 20 5 eA alsin 18 pipes rm North Burnaby 75 90. 9 a Totals 40 a ae Edmonds 2835 15 ee OKANAGAN North Shore 100) AO 3354 Kamloops 20 5 ea City Misc. 10 50 2 48 Notch Hill 20 oy ae 1 i Totals 725212 “67, 72 en 15 2 3 1 ‘ Total PROVINCE GENERAL Sor = a 2 2 Fernie-Michel 10 ay See : pes Nelson — 10 5 1 5 Ft. Langley 25 4 —— Powell River 30 5 Cpe Ladner 15 Seen bas Prince Rupert 10 22 ee ae 40 5 3:2 Se Sointula 20 3 ae ‘South Surrey 20 4 Ds: Steveston 10 tae ese ee 10 5 5 — Trail-Rossland 45 5-255 = Pac AOU: AE GAS im Correspon. 10 De Se Prov. Totals 750 166 55 49 Prov. Misc. . 45 5 5 1 Gity Totals-725 > 212° 57 72 Totals 190:..37 7192" 6 Gr'd Totals 1475 378 122 121 New national union in Canada The Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) was born in Winnipeg on Tuesday, September 24. It was formed by a merger Of the National Union of Pub- lic Employees (NUPE) and the National Union of Public Serv- lee Employees (NUPSE). Thenew ea is the largest national union anada, with a membership of 88,090, Jack Philips, secretary of Vancouver Civic Employees Un- 1on— Outside Workers, was pre-, eeiit at the founding convention. “his week, writing in his union’s Newsbulletin,’? Phillips com- Mented: “I would say that the merger - = very healthy development, acne the door to one Cana- 1an union for all government “mployees in Canada... ‘In addition, this union. . . will strengthen the Canadian au- ae That was proven by the ain of a resolution which sed for the following: That this convention instruct ae incoming national executive ae to submit to the 1964 ae Convention a resolution am- 3 ing the congress constitution ee that not later than = ary 1, 1965, all affiliated pe enzation of the congress Ust adopt and apply in practice, a Principle of autonomous aA nadian leadership, control and Ministration «f all sections of €ir union membership in Can- ada,” . ‘Other key resolutions con- demned the Norris trusteeship proposals, called for the estab= lishment of a federal-municipal loan fund, favored public owner- ahip of public utilities, and took a good position on a host of other pressing problems. The convention demanded the placing of an export tax on basic raw materials, to prevent the outflow of Canada’s natural re- sources. It also called for the Cana- dian government to press for ‘¢disarmament in world councils and for Canada to commence cut - ting out of military expenditure.”’ In addition, it went on record as opposing ‘‘the spread of nuc- lear weapons to countries not now possessing them.” The convention backed the NDP and urged all-locals to affili- ate to the party. One of the main weaknesses, Phillips pointed out, was the procedure which disallowed open debate on the terms of merger, thus forcing delegates to either vote against merger or vote for it, despite the many weaknesses in the terms of merger. As a result, some delegates voted against, others for (with reservations), i.e. the Alberta and B.C. delegations. Many delegates objected to the . provision which empowers the national executive to place under trusteeship any local dominated by “any corrupt influence.’’ No- where in the constitution is this ‘¢corrupt influence’ ‘exactly de- fined — yet delegates could not amend this McCarthyite tactic; they could only vote for or against the principle of merger. This sweeping blank cheque gives the executive the right to move against amy local that shows sign of independent or un- orthodox opinion, or any implied or real threat to a national of- ficer. “These provisions represent our worst import from the U.S.A., the introduction of cold war policies and divisions into the labor movement,’’ Phillips said. ‘‘They also stand in sharp contradiction to the positions CUPE adopted on Canadian aut- onomy, peace and disarmament, and the building and strengthen- ing of the Canadian economy as opposed to subservience to the |. U.S.A.”’ Warning against any attempts ~ to secede because of these anti- democratic sections of the con- stitution, Phillips concluded: *“‘Now that the merger is com- pleted, it is up to the rank and file to insist on the imple- mentation of the excellent pro- gram that was adopted. It is in- cumbent on the rank and file to protect their locals against any attempts to impose conform- ity by use of the sweeping powers granted to the national executive. This road—and not secession— is the way forward. Inunitythere is strength!’’ x FPG) scar aur 10 ae rweie f> FonTuMEs AT AGE 2° Ud WIL BE POOR’ G1—81,000) ‘ CBD wu Be vesrrute 60> AS DID NOT PLAN TO BE FAILURES Tce they just failed to make plans! SRN am Ne Rade Ns Oe Mevnee Sot ine “a Sle The New England Life Insurance Co. recently inadvertently show- ed what the youth of the U.S.A. can expect under capitalism., According to its actuaries, of 100 youth who start out ‘‘to make. their fortunes’'at age 21: 16 will not live to reach 65, one will be rich (over $10,000 a year), three will be well-to-do ($5,000- $10,000 a year), 32 will be self supporting ($1,000-$5,000). Of the remaining 48, 16 will be poor ($1-$1,000) and 32 will be absolutely destitute. : October 4, 1963—PACIFIC TRIBUNE—Page 11