DETAILS OF THE CELGAR PROPOSAL were explained at both the Castlegar and Nakusp meetings by Local 1-405 Ist vice-president Jack Munro shown here with Jim Inglis, chairman of the Nakusp Sub-Local, during the Nakusp meeting held the evening of November 21. CASTLEGAR CELGAR STRIKERS, members of Local 1-405, are shown casting their ballots to reject the latest company offer for settlement of the three-month-long strike. The voting followed the special meeting held in Castlegar November 21. The members at this meeting and the members in Nakusp that evening voted 93.3% to reject the proposal. LOCAL 1-71 WINS ARBITRATION CASE FOR MEMBER IWA An East Indian member of Local 1-71 fired for incomve- tency by Weldwood of Can- ada’s Empire Lumber Divi- sion at Squamish, won rein- statement with lost pay of $1,150 when the Local Union took the case to arbitration. Local 1-71 2nd vice-presi- dent Walter Kozij reports that the able arguments put up by lawyer Alex Macdon- ald who presented the case for the Union, and Rae Eddie, MLA, the Union’s nominee on the board, were instrumental in winning the favourable award. DISCIPLINING Kozij added that this vic- tory was especially pleasing to the Local officers who have suspected the company of dis- ciplining individual East In- dian employees for no other reason than to throw fear in- tc the others. The company’s whole case hinged on whether it could prove the fired member was incompetent to do his job. The Union argued that the com- pany had failed to prove its point and during the hearing brought out more than enough evidence to convince the board that the member had been unjustly dismissed. The member, Amar Singh Biln, had worked for the com- pany two and one-half years. Until August 1967, he had worked on the planer and the green chain. Around the 4th of August, he was demoted from the planer chain and made clean- up man. On the 8th of Sep- tember the company fired him from this job charging that his work was unsatisfactory. During the board hearing, the company pressed the point of Biln’s demotion in an at- tempt to prove that he was completely incompetent. The board refused to buy this ar- gument. While agreeing that he. might have been unsatis- factory on the planer and green chain it maintained that there was not sufficient evidence to show he was in- competent to do the job of cleanup man. The board in refuting this point stated: “The evidence brought by the Company as to Biln’s rec- ord of performance as clean- up man is less persuasive. He was on the cleanup job for slightly more than one month and although the witnesses for the Company testified that his work was unsatisfactory there was little or no evidence tending to show the standard of his work as compared to that expected of a cleanup man. , DEFINITION “Tt is clear that the Com- pany may discharge for in- competency but before it can be determined whether or not an employee is competent or incompetent the definition of the word ‘competency’ must be found. “The Board has considered the award of the Arbitration Board in the case of IWA Lo- cal 1-424 and Strom Lumber Company Limited dated the 25th June, 1954, where com- petency is interpreted by Pro- fessor A. W. R. Carrothers, Chairman of that Board, as follows: STANDARD “In respect to any given function in the Company’s mill whether skilled or un- skilled, there is only one standard of competency, eith- er the employee performs a normal or average day’s work, in terms of quantity or qual- ity, or both, or he does not; he is either competent or in- competent.’ ° . . ‘if any em- ployee is to be classified as incompetent the differences between his performance and the standard by which he is being gauged, the standard of the productivity of the aver- age man performing a normal day’s work at a given func- tion, must be measurable and substantial. The fact that an employee’s performance com- pares unfavourably with the performance of another em- ployee performing the same function may be evidence that the first employee falls sub- stantially below the standard but the fact that an employee is ‘less competent’ is not con- clusive evidence that he is ‘incompetent’.” “And again: * “But whatever may be the basis of a man’s incompetency the difference between his competence and the standard must be measurable and sub- stantial before it can form the basis for layoff or discharge.’ “In the case before this Board it was evident that the grievor was not competent to perform the work required on the green chain and the plan- er chain. A great deal of evi- dence was adduced to this effect and, as has been point- ed out above, the grievor did not complain when he was demoted as a result of this in- competence. “The evidence adduced by the Company as to his per- formance as a cleanup man is less satisfactory. “There was evidence as to the nature of the work to be performed by a cleanup man but none as to the standard which is required in the job. It was clear that in the opin- ion of the supervisory per- sonnel who gave evidence the grievor did not perform at a level which he might have done but the Board is unable to determine from the evi- dence before it that the griev- or’s standard of performance was measurably and substan- tially below that of an aver- age man performing a normal: day’s work as cleanup man. AGREEMENT “Article XXIV Section 2 (d) of the Collective Agree- ment provides that if any ar- bitration board finds that an employee has been unjustly suspended or discharged that FIRED FOR INCOMPETENCY BY EMPIRE LUMBER DIVISION employee shall be reinstated by the Company without loss of pay and with all his rights and privileges preserved un- der the terms of the Agree- ment, and provides further for the assessment of the amount of wages to be paid to the reinstated employee. “The Board finds and awards that Amar Singh Biln be reinstated as a cleanup man.” HOLD EVERYTHING ... with Watson Logging and Lumber Gloves. Special designs for chokermen and riggers ... lumber handlers and ‘Cat’ or truck drivers. Ask for them by name — . .. Watson Green Chain » Mitts, Mill-Rite and Lumber Loader Gloves. WATSON 4 127 E. 2nd Ave., Vancouver, &