WORLD PASOK wins majority, right forces suffer defeat | ‘With new momentum’, pledges Greek CP Tribune Combined Services The June 2 national elections for Greece’s 300-seat Parliament were a defeat for right wing forces gathered under the New Democracy Party (NDP) which, while Increasing its popular vote by just over one percent, fell far short of the victory many in the West had predicted. Voting results gave the Panhellenic Socialist Move- Ment (PASOK) of Premier Andreas Papandreou 161 Seats with 46.5 per cent of the vote, the NDP took 125 Seats with with 40 per cent, the Communist Party of Greece (KKE) won 13 seats with 9.6 per cent and the Eurocommunists one seat with 1.6 per cent. Greece’s complicated unequal voting system gives a decided ad- In a preliminary comment on the outcome, KKE gen- eral secretary Charilaos Florakis said that ‘‘it is obvious that a part of the electorate were influenced by the ‘‘dangerology”’ campaign of PASOK (which raised the spectre of a return to concentration camps and urged left voters to abandon the KKE in favor of PASOK), the inequalities of the electoral process, discrimination, economic and other measures ...’’ The KKE, while retaining the 13 seats won in 1981, saw its vote drop by almost one per cent, a swing which benefitted PASOK. The real strength of the Communist Party will be seen not only in the popular movement, but also in the un- avoidable political realignments which will follow the vantage to ‘‘leading’’ parties, providing outright gifts of —— election, said Florakis. Seats. Given the popular vote, for example, the KKE Would today have 30 members. In a front-page story June 3, titled ‘‘With New Momentum’’, the KKE newspaper ‘‘Risospastis”’ mmunist Party! (KKE), says this election banner in Greece which i saw a return of Premier Papandreou’s | Panhellenic Socialist Movement with a | majority June 2. New political realignments | will be seen, the KKE says, to signal a course for real change. wrote: “‘The struggle for change continues with new Tmmentum, with new optimism and strength; with the suength of the Communist Party which was not ex- pressed in the electoral results, but will express itself in political life. ““Yesterday’s election results show that PASOK grabbed a part of the left vote by surpassing every prece- dent in dishonesty and anti-democratic behavior, both by the electoral procedures and by creating a climate of fear and pressures. “With those votes, but mainly by the theft of the legitimate seats in Parliament of the Communist Party, because of the electoral law, PASOK ensured itself 161 seats. The NDP increased its forces, taking some votes from PASOK ... ‘These results show that the main electoral goal of PASOK was to shrink the left forces, but: e ‘This goal was only achieved in minimal terms. PASOK’s aim of the ‘disappearance’ of the left did not succeed. The Communist vote was only slightly smaller than in 1981 (10.4 per cent in 1981 compared to 9.6 per cent in 1985). e ‘The real strength of the Communist Party, which was increased by its unity campaign, will appear and triumph in the popular movements and in the coming political realignments. PASOK’s go-it-alone policy, the intensity of Greece’s problems, the conservative out- look of PASOK all ensure that the popular movements will develop and political-realignments will take place. ““With the decisive participation of the KKE and its dependable unity policy, the June 2 electoral resutls will not become a stage for conservative development in Greece, but will signal a new course for real change — based on the militant, people’s intervention and wider cooperation of Communist with radical socialist forces for such change.”’ When elected in 1981, PASOK committed its govern- ment to pull Greece out of NATO and the European Economic Community, a promise it has yet to fulfill. The KKE and other left forces have pledged to continue their struggle to press re-elected Premier Papandreou and PASOK to carry out these commitments and stand by its promise to remove U.S. military bases from Greece by 1988. a International Focus Tom Morris Their youth Young Soviet Jews are in a “wretched human __pre- dicament”’, Canada’s UN am- bassador told the National Council of Jewish Women in | Toronto, May 23. Later in the | evening symbolic diplomas | were handed out to draw atten- tion, said organizers, to the Problems ‘‘refusnik’”? youth have in getting an education in the USSR. Stephen Lewis and his hosts Might have performed a ser- vice had they focussed on Canada Manpower Centre a Centre de -doeuvre du Ganada Canadian youth pees and handed out a few diplomas to and ours the hundreds of thousands here who are denied higher education. They might have also of- fered some hope of work to the alarming number of Canadian ~ youth dispossessed and aban- doned by the system. But that would have been too close to the bone for the so-called so- cial democrat who makes his living as a Mulroney mouth- piece. : A Soviet child almost cer- tainly will attend kindergarten. He will have his basic educa- tion free. He will be able to attend university or vocational school free. He will receive a government stipend while doing so. If he selects on-the- job training, he will receive full wages. Working youth can study part time (43 per cent do). Young families get generous housing and child assistance. Their rent does not exceed 3-5 per cent of their income. — State loans for cooperative members for housing construc- tion carry an annual 0.5 per cent interest rate. In rural areas 90 per cent of building costs may be borrowed and, after 50 per cent is repaid, the other 50 per cent is picked up by the state or cooperative. All receive vacations with pay. All receive maternity leave with pay. Everyone gets free medicare. There is no unemployment. This (and more) applies to every Soviet youth — Jewish and non-Jewish, Christian and non-Christian, Muslim and non-Muslim, Communist and. non-Communist — _ = an achievement unheard of out- side the socialist world. Stephen Lewis should take his ‘‘youth crusade’’ roadshow to Newfoundland or to north- ern Canada’s Native youth. He should depart the pleasant streets of north Toronto for the city’s core, the Manpower of- fices and youth hostels. There’s where he could © chatter about education and jobs and see a wretched human predicament. The Prince and the people This is for all you Mon- archists. The Toronto Star reports on the 3-day visit by Prince Phillip to Ottawa and Toronto begin- ning June 4 to present some- thing called the Duke of Edin- burgh Awards. Here’s what a Prince of the Realm does: Arriving at CFB Uplands, Ottawa, he ‘‘will leave imme- diately for Rideau Hall and a private luncheon with Gover- nor-General Sauve.”’ In To- ronto ‘‘the Prince will dine at the Royal Canadian Yacht Club at a private reception.” He then ‘“‘goes to Queen’s Park for a private luncheon with Lieutenant-Governor Aird ... All day Thursday he will attend private sessions of the International Awards Forum before he meets pre- mier Frank Miller for a private dinner at Ontario Place.”’ Caught in the act In April, 1985, Pretoria an- nounced with 2 Yourish that it had withdrav::: the last of its troops from Angola. Reagan’s eminence gris, Chester Crock- er, trumpeted the announce- ment as a triumph for Washing- ton’s “‘constructive engage- ment’’ policy. Everyone else waited. The wait was short. Last week a South African Army commando unit was trapped inside Angola and its com- mander, Captain Wynand Pet- rus du Toit, captured. At a news conference in Luanda, du Toit explained his mission: to blow up the Malongo oil refinery, a com- PACIFIC TRIBUNE, JUNE 12, 1985 e 9 plex jointly owned by Gulf Oil and Angola’s state company, Sonangol. The strike, said du Toit, was to cause ‘considerable economic set- back”’ to Angola by wrecking Sonangol which processes half the country’s crude oil. Predictably, Pretoria denied du Toit’s story. General Con- stand Viljoen said South Africa simply has military units in Angola on ‘‘reconnaissance and information-gathering”’ missions. General Viljoen then announced his retirement. The point is: ‘‘constructive engagement” is simply a U.S. licence for apartheid to tighten its grip at home and continue attacks abroad. ONG re