Labour ~ CLC moving to ‘new internationalism International solidarity has always been one of the comerstones of the world trade union movement. Through the years, it has helped win many tough strikes in different countries. The lives of many political activists and trade unionists have been saved due to campaigns taken up by labour centres, labour councils, and local unions all over the world. ; In the recent tribute to Nelson Mandela in London, it was the African National Congress leader himself who thanked those who had chosen to care and get in- volved. Before millions of TV viewers, he personally thanked the people and or- ganizations that were part of the Free Nel- son Mandela campaign. At last month’s Canadian Labour Con- gress, one of the highlights was the debate on the international affairs paper. After an interesting and highly charged discussion, “Worker Solidarity and the Challenges of Global Change” was referred back with instructions. Those instructions were that, rather than just having the CLC decide what in- ternational organizations labour councils and federations should have contact with, the central should work with those bodies to enhance intemational solidarity. The referral was also to clear some outstanding problems that have faced Canadian trade union activists for a num- ber of years, including support for the struggle for a Palestinian state and the Con- John MacLennan gress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU) in South Africa. It was guest speaker Moses Mayekiso from COSATU who said pointedly that if you want to help the struggle in South Africa, you must stop supporting two centres in the struggle. His reference was to the congress’s position of supporting COSATU and NACTU. COSATU has 10 million mem- bers while NACTU represents 100,000. But in general, it appeared that a “new internationalism” is on the agenda. Ac- cording to the document: “The CLC will vigorously promote the concept of a major international con- ference to discuss the impact of world trad- ing blocks on workers everywhere.” Under the title “Organizing Intemation- al Solidarity,” the paper continues: “To an increasingly large degree, the ability to achieve our goals will depend upon reach- ing out in other countries, and effectively communicate, plan and strategize ways to lobby international decision making. | LABOUR IN ACTION “The CLC will undertake a program within the formal structures of the interna- tional trade union movement in the 90s to ensure the vision, goals and values of Canadian workers are well articulated. . “The focus of such a program will be to ensure that the Canadian labour movement is able to combine its efforts with of others to defeat the international corporate agen- da.” In addition the CLC will pursue whatever contact with national labour centres are necessary, irrespective of inter- national affiliation, to ensure Canadian workers are able to exchange their views and coordinate policies with the widest possible number of trade union organiza- tions around the world." Clearly that means the CLC is adjusting to the new global reality. With transnation- al corporations embracing “free trade” here (Mexico included) and the 1992 project in Europe, and promoting a speeded-up restructuring, a new kind of solidarity has to go well beyond the sort practiced to date. Next November in Moscow will be the 12th congress of the World Federation of Trade Unions (WFTU). That convention will try and deal with some of the problems of the new world economic realities. Canadian trade unionists have been invited in the past, but due to the CLC’s affiliation to the International Con- federation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU), few have been able to take part. That ideological barrier should now to be removed, particularly in light of the relentless attack by the transnational corproations. The events in Eastem Europe, and in some cases their naive ex- perimentation with free market strategies, make it essential that contacts and meet- ings between trade unions and trade unionists take place. The WFTU meeting won’t be the only chance the CLC will have to put its new policy to the test. But this is a golden opportunity to put Canadian international solidarity into action. : There are new organizational attitudes that also must be taken to the world trade union movement. Centres like the WFTU, ICFTU and WCL must put aside their ideological and political differences and start the urgent process that could evolve into one trade union centre that could most effectively take on the TNCs economic and political agenda. Privatization result of underfunding: HEU { Continued from page 1 pany representatives and the hospital’s per- fusionists. “Certainly, there have been recur- ring staffing problem(s) at the Vancouver General Hospital, as elsewhere in this country, and there have been discussions about ’going private,”” he wrote, Tyers suggested a time slot for a study session which “might also allow interested perfusionists from other centres in the province to attend.” A Wall Street Journal article describes PSICOR as arising star with 250 U.S. hospi- tals under contract and a company “in the rent-a-perfusionist business.” The company is trying to break into the international market, and has scored con- tracts in the United Kingdom and recently achieved a foothold in Canada at Toronto General Hospital, Allevato reported. There are 780 patients on the waiting list for heart surgery in B.C. Contracting the services of perfusionists to PSICOR -will only make it easier for the skilled tech- nicians — usually respiratory therapists or registered nurses who take one year of train- ing at Cariboo College and another at Van- couver General — to move to the U.S., she said. “We don’t see it as improving, but rather exacerbating the waiting list.” The heart surgery crisis in B.C. is caused by the shortage of perfusionists and critical care cardiac nurses, Allevato said. ‘Not part of Kelowna deal,’ says Zander Continued from page 1 this thing. Labour was looking bad. There was some good news. It appeared as though the BCGEU was getting closer to a settle- ment. And so on November 10, we con- vened a meeting of all the Operation Solidarity executive. Everyone was there. Joy Langan, vice-president of the B.C. Fed; Lief Hansen of the United Food and Com- mercial Workers Union; Jack Adams of the BCGEU; Larry Kuehn of the BCTF; Roy Gautier of the Building Trades; Jack Gerow, chief spokesman of the Hospital Employees Union; Bill Zander of the Carpenters Union. Everyone but Kube. He was at home. Out of it. We met in my office and we sat there a good part of the night to see what we could do. We all felt we were heading for insanity and that we had to get a settlement. So at about four or five in the moming we agreed on a package. We wanted to see Bill 2 killed, and we wanted an exemption from Bill 3 for all public sector unions. There were to be no reprisals against any strikers and education funding was to remain at 1983 levels. We wanted changes to the human rights and Pacific Tribune, June 11, 1990+ 8 landlord-tenant legislation and consultation on social issues.” But he was not a participant in that meet- ing and was not even part of the body that proposed the deal referred to by Munro, Zander asserted in his Jan. 5 letter. “I was not ever on the Operation Solidarity executive, and never attended a meeting with you and the others (either at your office on Pender or at any other place) to put together a package which resulted in your flight to Kelowna and a verbal accord reached with Bennett,” the letter stated. In his letter, Zander also expressed. his disagreement with Munro’s assessment of events in the fall of 1983, adding that he did “not believe that Bennett had the upper hand,” and did not think that labour was “looking bad,” as Munro had claimed. ' “The 26 bills caused the largest public uprising this province has ever seen and a backlash against Bennett to the point that he packed it in before the next election,” it said. Zander told Munro: “Jack, what you did . was, in my opinion, neither stupid nor brave as you put it. What you did was allow your- self to be used to derail, with all its faults and problems, a movement fighting to stop the abuse of a government bent on trashing long established social conditions and the rights of ordinary people. “So that history is recorded accurately,” he added, “I request that references to myself be removed from any. further edi- tions. Further to this, I hereby request that you provide me with a written retraction of the error made in reference to myself.” BANGS <civs issue as Address: FIFIBUNE. Published weekly at 2681 East Hastings Street Vancouver, B.C, V5K 1Z5. Phone: 251-1186 Be no nc te oe ee) Ode! | am enclosing: 1 year: $20 12 years: $35 C3 years $50 ClForeign 1 year $32 OC) Operations like PSICOR make their offer to hospitals attractive through low initial rates. But “our experience is, when institu- tions get hooked on privatization, the costs rise and the service deteriorates.” PSICOR sometimes fulfils its contrac- tual obligations by using lesser trained per- fusion assistants, thus reducing the quality of health care at hospitals, she noted. VGH administrators in subsequent state- ments have claimed the hospital is not look- ing at privatizing perfusionists, and have indicated that Tyers sent the letter on his own initiative. . But privatization of hospital services continues in other areas, and with the aid of elected Social Credit members and ministry staff, the union noted. Union staff say the government’s scheme of sending B.C. heart patients to the U.S. for surgery is one form of privatization. Another is the contracting out of laundry services, which has already been done at VGH. Another hospital, Royal Inland in Kam- loops, is examining going with the VGH contractor, K-Bro. And the firm is building a plant in Cumberland to service the hospi- _ tals in Nanaimo, Comox and Campbell — River. i neeee Beueeeeeee Oe ore ps 8 eal ey eee S