II. LAND USE DESIGNATION AMENDMENTS

The following comments received about the Land Use Designations in the
Draft Plan resulted in changes to the Draft 0.C.P., as noted.

R idential D ‘ tions

1. Disagree with "Townhouse" designation on Prairie Avenue opposite Viscount
Alexander Elementary School. (Changed back to "Apartment").

Disagree with "Townhouse" designation on properties south of Pitt River
Road, east of Shaughnessy and west of Mary Hill Road. (Changed back to
"Residential").

ial Desi

1. Disagree with “Highway Commercial" designation at the northwest corner of
Shaughnessy Street and Lougheed Highway. (Changed back to "Park''),

Should distinguish between active parks and natural parks. (Done)

A park site immediately west of Hazel Trembath School is missing.
(Included)

The "urban forest" in the South Shaughnessy area is missing. (Included)

Designate Cedar Drive ditch/walkway as "Park". (Done)

Urban R Designati

1. Disagree with proposed boundaries for "Urban Reserve" - comments ranged
from enlarging the designated area to eliminating it altogether. (Revised
to include area west of Burns Street alignment )

Til. GENERAL COMMENTS

A number of general comments were received that did not result in specific
changes to either policies or land use designations. These include:

Concerns about amount of designated multi-family areas.
Concerns about quality and amount of single-family areas.
Concerns about the rate of development.

Concerns about traffic and parking problems.

Concerns over the loss of trees and natural areas.

Desire for a Tree Bylaw.

Opposition to the Lincoln Avenue- Coquitlam River crossing.
Need more affordable housing in the City.

OnNDMN wp ere

ITEht | PAGE :

Cont'd.../4&

113