Indian Communist issues plea for unity HIRENDRANATH MUKERJEE, leader of the Communist Perty of India: CANADA, once the passion N I of discovery had sent birch- bark canoes down unmapped waters, pushed railways acfoss the Rockies and dropped men to the frozen seas. Today you feel no doubt the magnetism of your moneyed neighbor but I’m em- boldened by this invitation to say that you are no dusty desert of dollars and smartness, that you are no spiritual dependency of some external power, that you wish to build something of your own, that you -pull your weight in the international-com- munity... * * * For some seven or eight years now, relations between my coun- try and China have been strained and four years ago, wé had a short military - confrontation which hurt then and huris even: now... I am afraid I have neither the time nor inclination to enter into a controversy as to the how and the wherefores of what happen- ed on the China-Indian border, in October, November, 1962. I want to write on a clean slate and I say if hurts, what happen- ed at that time, from the point of view of both China and India. But how can I on account of the hurt which, even as a Com- munist, I have received from a Communist country, from which I had the greatest expectations— how can I 6 that account for- get or undermine the stupendous significance’ of the Chinese revo- lution of 1949, and the massive changes that have taken place since? How can J as an Indian and an Asian fail to share some- thing of the-exultation that came to the disinherited countries of the world when China, in the eyes of the imperialist countries “coolie’ nation, stormed the heavens as ‘it were and opened new perspectives that are lumi- nous in their. renown... _ As Asians, as inhabitants of the continent which has been for so many years petitioners in the chancelleries of the West, we were proud as Communists of the stupenous achievement which China had made. And India pressed nearer to China, a great deal nearer than to the Soviet Union, and a genuine friendship with infinite poten- tialities was opened up, 80 to speak, before the eyes of our people. I think of Bandung, to which reference was made, was the high-water mark of India-China cooperation. Bandung which wiped out as it were eux ..sian humiliation, the aumiliation of Hiroshima aud Nagasaki. Don't forget it was always Asia that has beer. the target of American and other Western “special war- fare’ — atom bombs on Japan, germ warfare in Korea ahd now, acco ‘ding to reports, in Vietnam, pcteon gases, napalm, “Lazy- Dogs” and fragmentation bombs and God knows what other enor- mities. It is difficult for Asians easily to forget and to forgive. a _. Life is hard and history is a cruel goddess. There started the rift in the lute—from 1959. on- wards—but it is our people’s wish whatever might have hap- pened at that time—that the rift be repaired, that India and China and the entire world movement for socialism—socialism which is the fulfillment of freedom, not just in the shape of affluence but in the shape of the non- acquisitive society, socialism which means in scriptural lan- guage, our being members of one another. I know that India made mis- takes—I don’t hesitate to ack- nowledge it—we made snail's pace progress—there was more talk than concrete programatic advance toward socialism, there was heavy western pressure al- lied with Indian reaction, which - continues today in a more aggra- vated form.,. But while India made her mis- takes, China made mistakes, too. China. calculated that India had jumped on to the American bandwagon. Some of our peopie in the leading positions were no doubt tempted—after all, you can’t be astonished, that in a country like India, emerging into the light after centuries of de- privation, there were people who were tempted by the lure of American brandishments. But while India appeared to see the way toward socialism and then began to waver, her heart was in the right place. * * * Sino-Soviet differences had created an almost impossible situation—which is fhe biggest problem today as far as my coun- try is concerned. Today, there is in the Communist movement nei- ther one nor more guiding cen- tres, a guiding party or parties, or other parties which are mere- ly guided. Every national party works its own way out, though of course international consul- tation and advice are very im- portant. But, let this be remem- bered, there never has been and will never be a Communist move- ment that is anti-Soviet, and I am sure that deep down China understands it too. At the same time, at this hour of day, there cannot be a triumphant world advance toward socialism with-. out China being in the vanguard, along with the socialist third of the world and other countries recently emerging into freedom. If we cannot reforge this com- ° bination, the future is dismal and dark and whoever contri- butes to the perpetuation of the kind of difference which has come about in the international Communist movement, is no friend to the advance of social- ist forces all over the world. I know that China is confront- ing the United States as its pri- mary enemy, and the United States is the enemy of all that is progressing in the world today. The United States, despite the fact that many of her people are among the most decent in creation, is today history’s most diabolic military machine and money power—fighting with a ruthlessness that almost \ puts Hitler to shame, a ruthlessness that one wouldn’t normally cre- dit, spending in South Vietnam (15 million population) in fight- ing during one year 21 billion dollars. This means as far as my country is concerned, that the total gross national product of India, with a population of 480 million people, is less than the amount of money which the United States spends in Viet- Mam <<: : * * « ay As far as my country’s rela- tions with China are concerned, even in the dark days of late 1962, Jawarhalal Nehru, with whom I had many differences, did not hesitate to say that China and India couldn’t con- ceivably go on fighting. He never hesitated to dissociate India from the American design that, in return for aid, India par- ticipate in the task of containing China and the advance of com- munism in my part of the world. His successors in government, in spite of a conspicuous lack of courage when faced with con- tinuing political and economic blackmail from American power, still could not quite espouse such containment policy. And India does want the Peo- ple’s Republic of China to be in the United Nations, pushing out altogether the puppets in Taiwan which was part of China many hundreds of years before Col- umbus discovered America. The president of the Indian Union, in his Independence Day address on the 15th of August called for earnest efforts to- settle outstanding issues be- tween India and China by nego- tiation. To ignore such things, on the basis of their ultra-leftist interpretation of the probable motives of an Indian govern- ment which has-been driven to the wall by American pressure— to ignore the reality of the de- mg of the Indian people and ven their representatives for a rapprochement with China—this is something utterly wrong. This is something that goes against the grain of decency and democ- _ TEACH-IN VIEWS Excerpts from four of the addresses de- livered last weekend at the University of Toronto's International Teach-In on the topic "China: Coexistence or Containment?" View ef the Teach-In’s Final Session in Varsity Arene. racy. To ignore such things would be to help the hands of the CIA and other agencies who are practising wetched depreda- tions from Dominica and Cuba to Ghana and Nigeria and 8° many other countries. * * *« More than half the human race haven’t enough food .. - Food and Agriculture Organi- zation statistics show that be- fore World War Two, 38 percent of the world’s population did not have enough to eat; after the war the figure has risen to 59 percent. How Jong can a country Jike India last if she has to spend 19 percent of her export earn: — ings on debt-servicing alone? — When the misery of the develop: ing world is as U Thani said “a progressive misery,” when — out debts pile up and the trade gap grows as the share of deve loping countries in total world raves export of primary commodities — drops from-44 percent in 1953- — 54 to less than 40 percent in 1963-64 — how long can Indian masses be fobbed off with plans that fail on account of hurdles. inherent in the present political and administrative systems? It is not possible much Jongé! to black out the story of the economic recovery in China after the setback which had fol-_ lowed 1958, a story as dramatic as any that this dramatic age — has seen? It is not possible much longer to cover up the idea that despite errors undoubtedly, China, where lives a quarter of | the human _ population, priate adjustments. * * * As sure as the sun will risé tomorrow socialism will triumph over the world. But it will not happen like a ripe plus falling into waiting mouths. The Jaws of artillery cannot be strongel than the Jaws of history, has to be dragged by the hand. To that task, overcoming differ- ences, we have to dedicate oul- — selves—a task which pre-sup- poses primarily unity in the world Communist movement, — and for myself, nearer home, ré- ‘forging of friendship betwee? — our two ancient countries — — countries that change and yet — — India and are changeless China. Nehru scribbled In his laste hours the following poem by Robert Frost: The woods are lovely dark and . deep But I have promises to keep _ And miles to go before I sleep — And miles before I sleep. We in the developing coun- tries have miles to go and wé | has blazed a trail that countries like — mine must folow, not mechank cally of course, but with appro” — have to be in a hurry—we need © 20 Jeague steps. We in India — have differed with China but we — look up to her when we shall — together. — again be marching The working. people are th salt of the earth and to be part | of their destiny is the greatest adventure of our time—an ad- venture to which I summon with ~ all humility the youth of Canada, — which has proferred me this — generous invitation to be here. October 28, 1966—PACIFIC TRIBUNE—Page 4 put victory does not come itself, it — —~—