'8 P xiii M I ~ 9-5 IfIRiii,~ii&iii'LU'll :=.'~" ~~hraiPmi j$ ..'=.: I()g@ I;IIFN;: RI hl I II I~V M I Nl Igg~llll ~III PIIWil $g f 58Ih ,lhii-'==.== sRs~fi!iiijiiil QRWIIW '~:-= ~ — ''.: IIII'~ . i'. /gg~~~~: i(5»r I 1 hl Ll & D iRII I JII I gyj ~~ &II e~ ! ggjlI jmg~~&iik'III%5 I II II%5 I---.--::=:- M'% II 5 a andri =' g'— g // I/( fg~~iyasa~a g +JAN !IIINis-,.', '"-iM8 ,g g/gliRRisglhi--' 'J/llll ~ gsg~li Illhil.Ill', I giy egg~ Bl ~I) ) I4 ! Sl 51 ~IH m~' /Illli& mW11,:miiii&II&&„.i= '=,=;;«'] /iIg .~~iigg ~~la~~i~-"-:--=.="—: . THE CORPORATION OF THE CITT OF PORT COQUITIAM ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION COMMITTEE Tuesday, March 5, 1991 Third Floor Meeting Room 2580 Shaughnessy Street, Port Coqultlam, BC 5P00 p.m. PERSONNEL IN AT1ENDANCE i ITEN Ii ITEM IIP lai Slg, 1TEM IIIP %I 'ip!'g I CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING RECYCLING PROGRAM UPDATE (Verbal presentation by Project Engineer & Report dated March 5/91) CONTAMINATED SITES: DISCUSSION PAPER (Report from Deputy City Eagineer dated March 5/91) ere ppmlslpp 1CAII ITEM IV III(l B.C ~ HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT Corporation and invitation for Mark Rose to meet with Committee (Verbal report from Deputy City Engineer) ppm im I i ila g,;~ i1 pepia plipmIeim Pl ~ PI ~ Msi I m~ I~~aig i ITEN Vi i sEH@ ~ piHI p II I mipp p .:=mi ~ IRliliiiesmsisl I I "- "!""-' 1% ($ i Q — NEW ~ 'RiRSR ~ 'imgIm~IPa ~m~ — — — I!PN@[lllg Ii)gmi ~~i~ j . —— mp ~ pep ml BUSINESS EIIR "~PP~II li~sl Sll il ' E ~Hi Njimi&~~:i~iimii~t ~spa~%i~— i P j ',~Rl= ~nli1mam~ill)(!!.....-P ~P«& lgx~ IF'ig —,-";;;,,::.Ps IP ... -- - "-" 'llll llh iWWiiiligmWJglil&'PnP =;".— '+~&mgii&iEiEH THE CORPORATION OF THE CITT OF PORT COQUITLAM ENVIRO~ PROTECTION COMMITTEE MINUTES meeting of the Environmental Protection Committee was held in the Heritage 2580 Shaughnessy Street, Port Coquitlam, on Tuesday, March 5, 1991 at 5:00 p.m. A Room, In attendance were: Alderman J. Keryluk, Chairman Alderman R. Talbot, C.F. Gaudry, P . Eng ., Deputy City Engineer A. de Boer, Project Engineer ITEM I: CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES The Minutes of the Environmental Protection Committee Meetirg held Tuesday, February 26, 1991, at 5:00 p.m. be considered, read, and adopted. Carried ITEN II RECTCLING PROGRAM UPDATE The Committee received a verbal report from the Project Engineer, Mr. Andrew de Boer on the status of the Port Coquitlam Recycling Program. Truck Purchase Purchase Orders have been issued to Co-van for supply of the trucks, and Dell Equipment for supply of the truck bodies. Port Coquitlam Engineering Staff will keep in constant contact with the two suppliers to try and achieve the delivery date by mid May, 1991. If delays are encountered report will be made back to Council for consideration to delay the starta up of the actual Recycling Program. Transfer Station report from the Project Engineer submitted to the City Engineer, dated March 5, 1991. The report was dealt with at Public Works Committee on March 5, 1991. It outlined four possible locations for Committee considered a a Transfer Station with correspoding costs for each. hmNI ms mm sm m Cont'd /2... J SIR IltlR gRl ) ~gims g ~ ig ~ P ~()l~ sg — [[~' „, ~ ~~g g] -:=-- iNRS,— . ms ~ &~&~ N%~$ IWgg)@PI I+ 'N& ILeaiarsii~g~& + " '- „~imams ~I — ~ ~ ~, . M n ~ — '- ='="'-'"~! IR R .. /gal -i~a~yh -~N iii N MR~i lggJg g)plMllmlImii — i i i~ =me Jg & ll %Iles -- '' — ' R s 'll ENVIRONMQPQK PROTECTION COMMITTEE MINUTES Cont 'd .. Personnel tentatively agreed on a classification and rate of pay structure for the new employees required for the Recycling Program. There will be a total of two new employees hired, one for each truck. In addition, there will be a temporary Foreman hired for approximately three months to help start up the program. Spare drivers will be trained to insure continuity in the event of a driver being unable to work. Union and Management have Adverti sing First Brands Canada Ltd. (Glad Bags) will supply the City with 10,000 free packets of bags to be distributed to each house prior to the start up of the Recycling Program. The City will print and insert into each bag an informational brochure describing the program. Newspaper Ads will be placed in the two local newspapers during several editions of the eight weeks immediately prior to the start up of the program. The information contained in these ads will clearly outline the City's program, how to participate, and a telephone number to call for further information. The garbage collection day notice put out once a year in August, will be updated to also include recycling information. informational newsletter is being prepared and will be included with the 1991 tax notices due for distribution in May. An The program will initially pickup single family residences only. Following successful implementation of this stage, we will then expand to multi family and bring on the industrial, commercial, institutional as soon as budgets and time permit. will experiment with composting in 1991, and report back to Council with a full proposal for a program commencing in the 1992 year. Ne ITEM III: CONTAMDIATED SITES: DISCUSSION PAPER received a r'aport from the Deput. City Engineer outlining information on the new directions for regulating contaminating si. tes arid a discussion paper issued by the Provincial Ministry of Environment in January, 1991. Committee Members decided to table the report and invite a member of the Ministry of Environment to discuss the matter with Committee. A tentative date of March 13, 1991, at 5:00 p.m. in the Heritage Room has been selected. Committee Cont'd /3 EEVXRONNEÃBK PROTECTION COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES ITEN XV: B C ~US Cont'd... WASTE MANAGEMENT City Engineer reported on bis instruction by Committee to invite Mark Rose, MXA, in his capacity as Vice Chairman of the BC Hazardous Waste Management Commission to attend one of the upcoming EPC Meetings to discuss the Commission. Unfortunately, Mr. Rose's schedule will not allow him to attend a Committee Meeting for the next number of weeks. Mr.. Rose's secretary will advise us as soon as our request can be accomodated. The Deputy Mr ~ ITEN V NEW BUSXMESS Coquitlam River Griste will be invited to one of our next EPC Meetings to bring the Committee up to date on happenings on the Coquitlam River system. Mr. Al at 7!00 p.m. The Meeting Adjourned 'Alderman J. Kgb!Xuk C.F. (Kip) Gaudry, P. Eng. Deputy City Engineer Commit tee Chal'rman CFG! gc MOTE Minutes not read and adopted by the Committee correct by the Committee Chairman's signature. until certified cc! Mayor and Aldermen City Administrator g,.)ill ! IQI11! !II~II & a& we'll'"!'II/) II!!Il :m!!!~™ .. '-"~~- ',i!*:,:~;=Pzz .=!Si!immwl ',",;,':-:=:.:.—:— ll[1$ [l j~ ' .': m 'eli ~ earns mmi! ajilg lm! gN~ —.: -' ,saggy~! jg Rg~gg!m! m.' j g I S;: ~ ~@!asm!Ila!'I !II N- s 9 I IU~! !!g ' u,::, s,",w,: ','~ —'.slhll .: — — Pljg w!sill i llis!I= =.". -~ij jjg'jggfg I i!'; „', a!a ~ !~~ J/( '-= g 'i!umi / I !'ll! Ig) ~gag!S)gr::—: ~pm!m!gg — 1 Sill !l !!~ !m a N THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PORT COQUITCAM MEMORANDUM Tor Environmental Protection Committee FROM: Rip Gaudry, P. Eng., Deputy City Engineer SUBJECT: DATE: NEW DIRECTIONS FOR REGULATING CONTAMINATED A DISCUSSION PAPERL JANUARY 1991 M=rch 5L 1991 SITES: we invit:e Mr. Waldemar Braul of the Ministry of Eavironment to our Committee meeting of March 13, 1991 for consultation and discussion on this That topic. IIACKGROUND 6 COMMENTS In January 1991 the B.C. Ministry of Environmeat published a discussion paper on new directions for regulating contaminated sites. It is an excellent publication and summarizes well the state of the industry regarding contaminated sites. The report deals throughly with identificationL remediation and on going monitoring of contaminated sites as they are identified. Ministry feels there is already an on going involvement by municipalities in the process. Certainly by direct and indirect means it is oftea municipal officials who identify contaminated sites and raise the issue with the Ministry of Eavironment. In most cases the clean up and remedial action is spear-headed by the Ministry of Environment. We understand there may be stronger participation by municipal governments if in fact the .land is municipal owned land, such as the receat clean up of harbour lands in Victoria. The Cont'd .../2 I85 Is gras /gal!'. , ZIU,. j@ is i m SS 4 lr I k IIIII' '~'hlllll1I1!!ljlg'~SIM""-""' -'" '--'.'«rg &Lang~=-= gj j rm" 4 i~sr '=- '-.1! flRINi! ;,; gjjjjjj — jg ress 13! W~ieh!j@ ) /1 ~ ill le% sm g I ' «L sr I rsf I L I sr I jr mLLL rml 11!g .....,. ~ Iris»LL . =- = 4 = ~ 'Stl lsl 4 mrLL« j Is Nj ~ m f'!4::= =;= ~ gl ssliJ4 g,r¹ammsis! g gI 1 II r~501li i L'-" i NL ~ 4(i Jligg III $ !r 5 115 ~ ~ ~ sl I I I I I ~ » ! I I I I ~ K& « IRll I I! 'I « I I L I ~ I Ir I Ill= I I I Ii I [ jj r U!1 ."=assisi'4 „sgjj 1ljj ~ighsLmsiaLLrs m ~, jggl S sr es ss s —— IW 44 g SM sms a mls "= — ~ mm s«smssssrSNSSsmm LLI~~44m«~L«S~ — I L sl I 'SI /$ mr M '« l lgi! 1i g/ g LL i jjgj g"'lilr !W-.-~'SHSI~ I ii~r,'4lms "'='rs-"-'II~ r~SSI]~ I«Il (jg ($ Iss imIIR Ill~!ri rslsLLmlls -- --. ~ '& W'mlr L ~ ~~ sSJSSSSLL« +l55W~ The one area where we perhaps should take a stand is the proposal to delegate many functions of the process directly to municipalities where a mutual agreement can be established. The report recognizes that not all communities can accept all responsibilities; however, in general they propose the following functions could be delegated to a municipality: Approval of remediation plans; Review and approval of assessments; — Determination of the extent of. public involvement; — Requirement of financial assurance for the due performance of the remediation process; and — Certification of the remediated site. — — Further, the report states that delegation of regulatory responsibility to municipalities would have to take into account factors such as: Technical capabilities of municipal staff; Indemnification against liability of municipal officials; and The types of pro]ects and sites, including whether they pose unique, specialized assessment and remediation. It is my opinion that we must strongly state the case that the municipalities are not in a position to accept any responsibilities or delegation of functions under this legislation at this time. There are several factors for my position: Most municipal officials in the engineering area are not Technical specialized in environmental issues and the technicalities associated with the type of specialized analysis and training necessary to deal intelligently and confidently in this area. In fact it is our belief that specialists in this area are few — — — and far between. Liability Municipal officials, both elected and appointed are sub/act to enough liability exposure with the current state of responsibilities and obligations. There is also the new predicament that certain offences now fall under the criminal code rather than the civil code. (IIII'l Cont'd .../3 ll li' h, WIIii ~ i ee 5 IMI, f I f I IIII'I I I I — ===--==--:.= =.-ual ~i~~ Sic mme ~~% ~I@Is lfz 3~ ! N smmsim~r ) li III IN,' I 1l 'If','$,'/QJ/(j [iI~& '"" ~ ~ziH iMIP I Is ~ s m m I IS @I 3 I -"."-''-'-"=" '. = .=-,'. ~ ~ ~ ~ -.. ='c~] l][pwg jar@ . R ) ) ~~ -''==== ~g g sm gg g g I 1 i)g ]gg iaa m NC8 11 m ~ p '' A I5%J ~ ~ ) ==~~== g ~ ~ ~ ~ 'lglsgf"" I I %1$ lllgg /AS = ~mamas& MEMC TO EPC Responsible Parties It is our belief that many of the contaminated sites that are currently identified or that are still unknown but potentially exist belong to companies such as railways, ma ]or petroleum companies and real estate holdings. It is undoubtedly more within the financial capabilities of the Provincial Government to deal effectively with these parties rather than small municipalities. Further, companies that do business in several municipalities could have identical problems, yet be receiving different treatment because of a lack of coordination. In the covering letter to the discussion paper the writer indicates that a meeting can be organized with a representative from the Ministry of Environment. I have contacted Mr. Waldamer Braul in Vancouver and he has agreed to attend a meeting at 5:00pm, March 13, 1991 if Committee agrees. I ~Ill Deputy City Engineer CFG:ck III"-,,'-,N ee~. !III Ikey'P:-:: ms mz I I I u u'd g iaj~!i~in,ismgj& ' )g „=:'-=.&~&18iNIC ~ ~~zzp II18$ SJ Pg lllN IS~a ]g~~~, ~~ ~ii ~N ~;',l'Nj[ ~ — ~ '~([)g( /~~~~imahg i&& — — ! .'. BMR ~ f/'l'I ~ —& Ijfjs s mmmm ~ I ''~ „)jssnlm jaggy'gj~ii~S,, .'" ~ ml ilglgg~.".'.iiig~ i g &g. ~msa & Jg] j'I[ 'i ,', „.,HIAI~/'$P iimihFj™M=: - 45 .— ~:-s."... '=ii 'ghi&&a»i. == =~+ ' 'lIE'aa, I jj i, I~@&l~~W~Wea ~~'m" 'Wllljg I - — '„, pa . p jj~Ng[', '' / j// /g~ gg == z&jji j sl)ERE SIS(jill' gmsu s ma s s~smNI i 0 „..—= "'Qggg gmssl~/~ggg~~sN — && I ggjN/gN TO: UNION Of BRnlSH COr.ulersiA MUNICIPALIllES Suite IS 10551 Shesbridge Way Richmond Sditieh Columbia Canada V6X 2W9 (604 l 270-5226 fax l604) 660-2271 Principal Appointed Officers: North Vancouver City North Vancouver District Richmond Surrey New Westminster Port Moody Coquitlam r Victoria Saanich Kelowna Prince George Kamloops Prince Rupert Port Coquitlam FROM: Richard Taylor, Executive Director DATE: February 27, 1991 RE: CONTAMINATED SITES DISCUSSION PAPER We received a quantity of the Ministry of Environment's Discussion Paper on Contaminated Sites. Besides a general notice of its release in our newsletter, we have selected a number of municipalities that might be interested and are providing you with a copy in the event you have not already received the material. We would be interested in any comments you might have. 2S/10/RI-cs I CITI| Of PORT COQUITLAM ENGlNEERlNG DEPT. FILE xe VfITI O1 HOI --- ——— — — —— Nmt 7 a m t I I el I III ial I I in . & 'kii Ia m I I I Province of British Columbia M intstry of te Management Bran h Btanahard Street Iotona Bnoah Cotomhta VBV 1xg Environment File: 135-40/WMP241 FEB De Rer r Sir/Madamr New Directions for Regulating A Discussion Paper Contaminated Sites: Attached please find a copy'of a discussion paper prepared for the Environmental Protection Division, Ministry of Er.vironment. The April 5, 1990 Speech from the Throne announced plans for amendments to the Waste Management Act relating to contaminated sites management. Bill. 68, Waste Management Amendment Act, 1990, which became effective August 30, 1990, implemented some initial changes. Many issues remained unaddressed; however, pending further analysis and consultation. The attached discussion paper identifies and discusses a wide range of issues. It outlines various options and reviews approaches selected to address them in legislation in other jurisdictions. Proposals currently being considered by the Ministry of Environment are indicated. The Environmental Protection Division intends to meet with a wide range of interested parties, and provide opportunities for discussion of planned legislation. In addition, written submissions will be welcomed. If you wish to arrange a meeting for your organization, or to clarify matters raised in the paper, please call Dr. John Wiens (387-9948) or Mr. Lloyd Johansson (387-9950) in Victor'a, or Mr. Waldemar Braul (684-8886) in Vancouver . Written responses to the discussion paper should be. forwarded as soon as possible, but no later than March 29I 1991 tot Dr. John H. Wiens, Head, Contaminated Sites Unit, Ministry of Environment, 810 Blanshard Street, Victoria, B.C. VBV 1X5 Yours truly, Fast Executive Director Environmental Protection Division 1~I 'Iia trna~a Don A. II I I ad% PII% l smm nit I Attach ) IE,immit'g~tPWIE Iljj a ~ ~ " 4 me —. a P N J )I P Ef ~ lmllh @ li — + ':: m + ~nw — — 'j '„— ~ $ '& Ill '!IIII II ]P $ ataamaarmx .'—: Nfl lb@ ' mi ' ~ ~~ ~~ / P WFS /~ g '--'~t WI 'll%IF] ~gjj ~ ~a 'IwuwIetgallar m PjIIP ' j 'I ~~ Ref~pl Ee~p P lCi~m I ~ jj I j - — BI~I 'gmmj [j I Eamawismtmta '%%5 I(lt~ j N RNNPm/jNQQ] W 2530 SHAUGHNESSV STREET TELEPHONE: 941 "3411 PORT COOUITLAPL e.c. FAX: 434.3324 V3C 2AS OUR FILE March 6, 1991 MR. AL GRIST Chairman, Environment g River Committee Port Coquitlam 6 District Hunting 6 Fishing Club P O. Box 122 Port Coquitlam, BC Dear Mr. Grist: REE INVITATION TO ENVIROM69FBK PROTECTION. COMMITTEE:MEETING The Environmental Protection Committee of the City of Port Coquitlam has asked that I invite you to one of our upcoming EPC Meetings to disc'uss the current status of your pro]acts on the Coquitlam River. The Committee would also be .interested to hear any general information you have on the Coquitlam River regime and further to be advised of your current discusssions with BC Hydro and the GVRD Water District. Ou- meetings are normally held on Tuesday evenings at 5E00 p.m. and perhaps we could suggest your attendance at the April 9, 1991 or April 23, 1991 meetings. Please contact me at your convenience to establish the meeting date. Yours truly, Deputy City Engineer CFG:gc cc: Alderman J. Keryluk, EPC Chairman Aldermau R. Talbot I.R. Zahynacz, P. Bng., City Engineer yw,m . ggill&w 2 ~ IW I I ESN Mll ieae ~NS I~ ~II 23 ~ ~if/ NN II I N I Im leal N .".mmlpl~.i'hE,,gl,',II/;I(E 2'F Is „8 ISKSImeIiaiiEm Igjj~p) m "."~mjjli I Tall Iles&~Em I 3 I I I I '='"~5 ~ii ~~~~'@RHII[liIij im Bill IS I; mllRIIIINII NIB" IE ~ 'a' IW~E -Emslsls asm Igg g p El ., ii N shg ~j I " ' ll~ E 'Ishc . j &Re' — gimpy] II ~[gg/gg ~/ ~ h II - !1$ lgg gll lii SEE (( /I mhlg I IE — ~ ~ /jghiiEsEs hgjImPT jism jan/ — ImI)lllSNjjmg~ yg~gMIIIII Q gg, iimp~~~ ','smi m E ~II'HEI gmjjir]RW ", ['E '"-:.~E. " E f ~ THE CORPORATION OF THE CI'1Y OF PORT COQUITI AM TO: B.R. Kirk City Administrator FROM: C.F. (Klp) Gaudry, P, Eng. Deputy City Engineer SUB JECT: ATTENDANCB AT 'EPC MEETING MARCH 12, DATE: March 6, 1991 1991 Chairman, Alderman Keryluk of the Environmental Protection Committee asks that you attend the next meeting of the EPC scheduled for 5:00 p.m. March 1991, in the Second Floor Meeting Room. The Committee would like 12, assistance in clarifying their role in the overall recycling program. your Por example, now that we are passed the initial conceptual stage and major budgetting process, does the implementation of the program fall to the Public Works Committee? If so, what is the ongoing involvement of the Environmental Protection Committee in the programf & Since discussions with you would be the only agenda item for the meeting on that night, I am going to propose to Alderman and Talbot that we meet prior to Council Meeting on Monday, March 11, Keryluk 1991 at perhaps, 6r30 or 7:00 p.m. Please advise if either date is acceptable to you. C.F. (Kip) Gaudry, P. Eng. Deputy City Engineer ) CFG:gc cc: Alderman Keryluk Alderman Talbot I.R. Zahynacz, P. Eng t)~II 1811mB / Jil ,'~)~l IN P'i w i ' W P!IIIj mSP j QSBBiii B'Eilg iB I) '- '-[Ig'l!! —"' TJILI )'dg/1l)PyhlglBBI',=;-;=-::Ma~~ ! g J ...sl lllMIRimr =,'== sg)/ms~'I gj THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PORT COQUITLAM Kirk City Administrator TO: B.R FROM: C.F. (Kip) Gaudry, P. Eng. Deputy City Engineer SUB JECT: PITCH IN WEEK DATE: March 4, 1991 (Ignviironmenta1" Protection Committee Meeting, February 26, 1991) Recommendations z That the Mayor proclaim the week of May 6 — 12, 1991 as Pitch-In proclamation similar in form to the attached. Week using a 2. (a) That we write to the School Board, Boy & Girl Scouts, all Service Clubs and other identified organizations to advise them of the City's support for the Pitch-In Week Program and to offer to pick up and dispose of any collected litter and recyclable materials. (b) That 45,000 be approved for Pitch-In Week and be allocated to the Engineering Operations Budget for garbage-collection and disposal budget. Funds to come from the Recycling Promotional Reserve Accouut. Background 6 Comments In January, 1991, Council approved a Pitch-In British Columbia campaign. 8600 contribution towards the 1991 Historically, in Port Coquitlam, we have not utilized the Pitch-In concept to The Ci.ty has not specifically requested Engineering any great degree. Operations to add additional trucks etc., nor have we placed newspaper advertisements in the paper encouraging participation in Pitch-In Week. Because of the lack of historical participation, no budgets were set aside for either newspaper advertising, additional trucks, or additional disposal fees for collected materials. Participation in the Pitch-In Campaign by a ¹ I Sa~s Nll Municipality such as ours would usually take the form of encouraging other groups and organizations to pick up litter in vacant lands, within school property, and other similar areas, and then offer to collect and dispose of this collected material at no charge to the organization. Please note that the group collecting the litter, i.e. Boy 6 Girl Scouts, private groups, etc., make their application directly to Pitch-In British Columbia for information and a supply of free garbage bags. Cont'd /2... 'ilJI~ /L"MiSI ~ f ~ ~ &iglimiii|PNII l S+alll,IIII''=.LS"— pl~~I"'~'~+&EI/lmgl5%55/ -- -~iENImeim~I~ - — SIINIINIEN m" "~~ '%IJRI~S IIIISRSKa e~ - — =~[W~NIEViiw.— m~RIC ~ — II I S& ml REPORT TO COIJNCIL Cont'd Rotary, In other communities, we understand that clubs such as the Lions Club, fee for bag a per off ring this by in program participate Kinsmen, etc., also be late it collected materials to the Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, etc. While in may of the City such groups for this year to try to encourage participation by next year. fur preparing to start efforts our worth would be Port Coquitlam, it encouragement Therefore, should the City wish to proceed with notification aodparticipate in them to encouraging organizations and to the various clubs then we materials, of and disposing collecting the City with Week Pitch-In advertisi.ng, Public will require approximately 55,000 to cover the newspaper The activity of materials. the collected fee for Works overtime and disposal program by the recycling overall with the coordinated be will the program Prefect Engineer, Mr, Andrew de Boer. Reserve In the past, Council has put aside funds in a Recycling Promotion that the propose We 523e632. at stands currently account the and Account funds be allocated from this account. C.F. (KipY Gaudry, P. Deputy City Engineer CFG:gc Treasurer's Comments: R. ,lisllsiih I'm in agreement with .the financial aspects of. this report. itlan'd, City Treasurer cc: Alderman J. Keryluk Alderman R. Talbot I.R. Zahynacz, P. Eng., City Engineer 'Ih'iI I IIII m 1@iiI NlIIS eeel ~ I I i I i iimI1$ me I m I I 1ii If I III i|I I ImI Iver i'iil I= ; I )IIIIII 'Ni mmmm ~ i mP RI W —, I'mlaa ~ —;— lm ex lag fJ s ee e ~meerI~)IESSI~eagi~'E == ===~i'l = —. —."-'/IIIAIi'.: '-=-= ES =-.s a mm II/ (Nh,'IK 4 am s w— le ee mm Iam mmgll IKIEl5 IIE -- lia— lee /~l'e: Iee~ ~, . lMlgg~ E eee '«F Alai Iee~E Ilml m aee ~ I Im ~ae Sl~~ — ~ ~ g-, — J Whereas the generation and disposal of waste has become a major concern to Canadians; and Whereas waste, when discarded as litter, spoils the beauty of the environment; and Whereas waste, when improperly disposed of into the environment, pollutes parks, recreational areas, beaches, highways, schoolgrounds and other areas and can cause physical harm to man and animals; and Whereasthe amount of waste can be controlled by reduction, re-use, recycling and composting; and Whereas littering can be reduced by technology, education, streamlined enforcement, legislation and community pride; and Whereas local government is concerned with the amount of waste produced by residents and businesses and wishes to encourage the reduction, re-use, recycling and composting of wastes and to promote community pride; and IIIIII II Ijl/SIR Whereas residents and businesses can reduce the amount of waste discarded as litter, it is deemed appropriate to appoint the week of May 6 to 12, 1991 as PITCH-IN WEEK in this community and to urge all residents to participate in the PITCH-IN CANADA Campaign by reducing, re-using, recycling, composting and properly disposing of all waste and by developing a sense of Community Pride. Mow therefore I, of .. of May 6-12, 1991 as do hereby declare the week PITCH-IN WEEK in IIf ii~ PITCH-IN Is a registered trademark In Canada '-- itwgIIS+- :.: iiiK = C.~s aeaa i i ig CQQUITLAM 0 O-PT. VAN'S INVESTMENTS LTD. ] S04 MAclNTOSH STREET COOUITLAM, S.C. CANADA V33 422 (604I 939.3200 ary 18th, 1991. Council, City of Port Coquitlam, 2272 McAllister Ave., Port Coquitlam, B. C. Mayor and V3C 2AB Dear Sirs I Proposed Recycling Service for Port Coquitlam Industrial Sites Upon discussion with the City Treasurer, Mr. Maitland, it is our understanding that the City proposes to introduce a curb-side blue box reclycling programme which would include service to the industrial areas. We are owners of industrial buildings at 1870 McLean Avenue and 2810 Huntington Place and would like to inform you of our objections to the programme as proposed. 1. We have no objection to the idea of the 3 R's reduce, re-use and recycle. Tenants of our buildings already utilize private recycling firms to collect their reusable materials and they receive monetary compensation for their efforts. For our tenants to become involved in a forced municipal programme would not be beneficial to them and would only be an unnecessary additional rental expense. The types of materials collected in a standard recycling programme do not accumulate in industrial operations to any degree (newspapers, tin cans, milk jugs, etc.). 2. The programme as proposed (curbside) would require our tenants to carry their boxes to the front of the building, a distance for our furthest tenlants of as much as 350 feet. We can be almost certain that they will not make use of this service unless the truck is able to pick up from each individual tenant. Also, will we receive only bne box for the entire site or will each unit be supplied with a box7 Surely you can understand that a central depot for the building would be unmanageable in an industrial building. ReI D' IlNI~ F23 EI3C 7 ~liNIISI PSM~ ~,WN ~ V — ~HI C: ISISSK',: n4444 m gg MI iR 1 5 ~ ~ i l -IW4ams:=-~ SR+)I =: — 5 mmlig :; ~ 0 Ml SSI USSI la p 44 ~ I I ~ II I Ims 8 RUM 5 %I RI 45I S I 2 We ! sea ill lml III %IIIII w f 1!l ii'a ap realize that in effect this programme is sector simplY another tax and, as usual, the industrial residential the benefit to must pay more than its share to the ever-increasing sector. This factor contributes our tenants. Added to this rate which we must pass onin towater rates beginning March is the huge 40% increase CitY does not live up the once again 1st. As a result, opportunity for encouraging and providing of to its goal industrial growth. Our recommendation to you would be to consider rather than curb-side providina individual tenant pick-up not be used) or will You assure can pick-up (which we number of pick-ups the on programme the of cost the base - so the true cost value building rather than the assessedmore what they will be of reflective be would for our users area from the curb-side paying, or exclude the industrial them continue to utilize let and pick-up programme entirely actually pays them to rewhich procedure their present cycle. Thank you for providing us with the opportunity to voice our concerns and opinion. Yours very truly, W. WCVyEV I lg ) 55%~ C. Van Leeuwen. LIIHI I/IE'. I PI,IP ! $ 1 Ill I Ilii ii iig~lj 1I 0/Iilil [pm mls im II IIIIII lie a i 1 I imI IN l II lI 1Ii m II I IIII aL11auII~m miII]IIIIs II/$ l 11 m$ 1 11 i ~ gl e&ss,, I s~sl82~ )N ~~. ~ g$ Ismll IRQ al Ssl ~ I IS 1mmlll ' I sg Q I s I I ~I ~I l I I% m l elm ~a~li d DATE: TO: Igor Zahynacz City Engineer FROM: Andrew de Boer March 5, 1991 Project Engineer SUBJECT: 1.0 Proposed Recycling Transfer Station Location BACKGROUND requested, a search for locations for the proposed recycling transfer station was undertaken. Four sites were selected and evaluated on a cost basis. Other parameters such as nearness to residences and accessability for recycling traffic were also considered in the evaluation. As 2.0 TRANSFER STATION LOCATIONS Pour locations — Broadway and Cameron, Welcher Dump, Lions Park and Trenton were investi ated for suitability as recycling transfer station locations. The site plans of the proposed locations are attached. 2~ 1 BROADWAY AND CAMERON This site is located on the future Fire Hall property in the industrial area off of Broadway and Cameron. The site would be a temporary location to be moved once the new Fire hall is built. There is a possibility that it could be re-located to an adjacent property to the south, if the property is procured for a new Works Yard. I Ikiii!Ve The site is poorly drained and filled with unstable materials. Site upgrade would consist of building a road into the site and bringing up the level of the property to permit proper drainage. draw-back to using this site is the proximity of the residences which are situated along the north side of Cameron. Visual and noise disturbances from the transfer station activities may adversely affect these householders. A )Sisii lfllll ll'lRH ~y P~ I--k @Q les s I Psm &smslI isII~ 'gg1I[ Ill I II I!I'J NmJ ~ 15 l memmsMslwm « I aalMmm ',gal I1 I mI M Iwl I os sm~ ~1y,ms ~ mshsm ~ a 4 IMS I ~~ I I lmg i s m i «~I@I s~~~ Is ~ sI I Rs M IKi i m I p «m Sm W I Tlml mllmImm 180lINI Il 'R .:IIslle " alai eel I~waih m'II m m I If I hl IgiK ~lgI IsIsa'm ~9 — em — ~ =- ~ sal ~& —— I I! 81 5 III i H ~J gled gg„fgj jggsmms mme«s Jlg r site offers a central, yet concealed location, It has the benefit "one-stop" drop-off location for both compost and recyclables. This le the implementation of a future single-truck curbside cycling pick-up. age of the site is the potentially high costs for power n. These costs may be off-set if power is installed in the East station. site is remote and out of public view there is also the possibility m of the transfer station equipment and structure. PABK located on the north end of the park adjacent to the Lougheed t is surrounded by bush, so the visibility of the site from the park From the Lougheed side the transfer facility will be clearly antages of the site are its closeness to the park, the limitation of e site and the possibility of disturbing park users with noise from ng operations. The access to the site is also limited to a back d the adjacent mall. N AND HOLLAND located in South Port Coquitlam in an isolated industrial area a hog fuel producer, ze is o make limited, and a substantial amount of site preparation would be it suitable for development. onal concerns of the site which were evident are: The site is close to other municipalities (Pitt Meadows, Maple This may result in residents from these municipalities lizing the transfer station as a drop-off depot for their ge), yclables. III 2) The site is too far away from the composting facility. This will make it difficult to implement future single-truck IIIINiiiqg I I ~ s i compost/recycling curbside pick-up. m ~ am 0 m Qws sw .asg ' I SR s M sg NN 3,0 COST SUMMARY The following table gives a comparison of the capital expenditures for each site. Caoital Exoenditures: CAMERON WELCHER LIONS TRENTON 8,000 Power: 8,000 7,000 8,700 44,000 5,885 5.000 44,000 5,885 10.000 + 8,000 10,000 3,000 44,000 5,885 4.000 8,000 9,000 53,692 44,000 5,885 5.000 Total: 878,585 $ 67,885 $ 74,885 $ 125,577 Fencing Landscaping Site Upgrade: Construction: Compactor Set-up: power cost for Welcher site are based upon extending power from the East Slough pump station, otherwise costs would be 830,000 rather than 810,000 + Andrew de Boer Pro3ect Engineer 7R SFEP STATIOIV LGCATIO 5 "1 g5 Sl 18/)))) lS me ~ ~ /Ql8 5 ,gg~j,rrg[g iiiRmk@i WILSON 2220 2 7 I 2~2 R.~-ND Ij.d:J.: Ii-::"I TERRY FOX LIBRARY REC. CENTRE IS 12 ps. 10ss le i,fimiji I IIII'I l O'IIIIII'III Ill'ilrlml e» ~ 5 IfE!'., ]lfii Ii, 'ISIS IIiiL " I ~ I ' I i' ii/ I y I " " isis ~ — i 11ili — ~ ... rlllilgl 5 1lli . -.. g ''' IIII i)i 'll 'is \ .. .1L 1lL I Ii NRRI se ei 2ls see ~ ~2 s Ill('"' =:..::.....-''II1IISWIIIS'''- l1II I: ii i ies — IIIIIII ~ wii ~ I i ss ill ~ sii ~ I I 2 I