“ae Carl = Bloice | FROM | MOSCOW __SAN FRANCISCO—Some day, per- haps, we will get the story straight. After the basic decisions have already been made. After the bodies start arriving back in black bags. Perhaps then we will know why they took us to war. Can’t say we know now. The people who watch and study and supposedly answer such ques- tions can’t agree on an answer. Indeed, they seem to be floundering around in search of one. “President Bush did not order Amer- icans to face death in the desert to save a few cents on the gallon,” writes New York Times columnist A.M. Rosenthal, who becomes ever more bellicose with each passing moon. Rather, he writes, the aim was to prevent half of the world’s supplies falling into Saddam Hussein’s hands. On another day, on the same page, William Safire, calling for an immediate “decisive, conventional World War 1/2,” writes that U.S. troops have not been sent to guarantee access to the oil beneath the Arabian sands. Meanwhile, says Zbigniew Brzezin- ski in the Washington Post: “The truly vital American interest in the Kuwait crisis is the secure and stable source for the industrialized West of reasonably- priced oil.” Karen Elliot House observes in the Wall Street Journal that “our vital inter- est,” to be defended militarily, is the “free flow of oil at tolerable prices.” And Wil- If these people - haven't figured out, or can’t agree on why we are in Saudi Arabia, it — ‘has to be difficult for the average person to comprehend why their sons, brothers, sisters, mothers and lovers are being sent over there. War fever gripping U.S. commentators liam Raspberry comments in the Post that “going to war to guarantee a con- tinuing supply of cheap oil hardly seems appropriate.” But right above him, on the same page, Irving Kristol writes: “... the statistic on dependency for imported oil is beside the point. It is the price of oil that counts.” : Robert Reno in Newsday says that while President Bush “insists on making “our part in this squalid confrontation into thing altogether celestial, the average : knows what the average Arab knows, which is that we’re there for oil, their oil, and novia pursuit of some vaguely conceived set of ’civit. ized ideals’ by which the Kuwait monar- chy hardly measures will.” Not everybody thinks our “vital inter- est” and “our way of life” is connected to oil. Former aide to President Jimmy Carter, Hodding Carter II, has a unique, rather alarming view involving 23 other Saddam Husseins-He says the country is “at war, an undeclared war” that is going to be “a very long haul” and a “protracted and bloody crisis.” Why? Carter says, “there are a baker’s dozen more cut from - his clothes from one end of the arch to the other, each with an itch to march across frontiers.” He wrote in the Journal: “Let Saddam succeed, or escape unscathed and there will be no restraining them.” (One suspects Carter used the marching- across-frontiers image because it doesn’t apply to Panama or Grenada.) I figure if these people haven’t figured out, orcan’t agree on why we are in Saudi Arabia, it has to be difficult for the aver- age person to comprehend why their sons, brothers, sisters, mothers and lovers are being sent over there. Maybe if we knew we might give our consent — or withhold it. There is something frighteningly eerie about the war-about-to-happen. Grown people are calmly writing in the newspapers about the imminent start of something just short of a world war and the president’s off fishing. Members of Congress don’t consider the moment im- portant enough to reconvene in emergen- cy and carry out their constitutional duty to represent their constituents at a time when tens of thousands of them are being ~ shipped off to a foreign war. Jt’s-hard to say who is away from Washington — the cats or the mice. “Still, even in a hot, humid month when much of Washington is now on vacation, there is a rush of excitement here,” R.W. Apple writes in the Times. “In news bur- eaus and Pentagon offices, dining rooms and lobbyists’ hangouts, the fever is back —the heavy speculation, the avid gossip, the gung-ho, here’s-where-it’s-happen- ing spirit, that marks the city when it grapples with great events.” It’s hard to keep in mind that this is a major military operation and not the eve of the Super Bowl. But we must. Speak- ing of the bloody long haul being pre- pared, Council on Foreign Relations ex- pert Michael Mandelbaum says that to “liberate Kuwait” will probably require “several hundred thousand men and a grinding bloody campaign.” Carl Bloice is Moscow correspon- dent for the U.S. People’s Daily World. 8 « Pacific Tribune, September 24, 1990 Left opposition grows.as German unity approaches Tribune Combined Sources BERLIN, GDR — More than 70,000 people gathered in the Lustgarten here Sept. 8 ina rally called by the Party of Democratic Socialism (PDS) to protest the agreement under which the two German states re- scheduled to be unified Oct. 3. Abroad range of speakers from organiza- tions in the GDR, West Berlin and the Federal Republic of Germany warmed that the reunification would result in the effec- tive annexation of the GDR by West Ger- amany and urged a continued struggle to save thé gains made by socialism. The huge-sally was held on the eve of a two-day conferente-ef the PDS which was aimed at re-establishing the-mass influence of the party. The party has recentlytaken a series of initiatives to frame a co-operative working relationship with other parties and groups both inside and outside the Bundes- tag (parliament). The Call for defence of democratic rights at the rally was given a Nlew-urgency by events the previous night whena youth fadio station — the largest in: the GDR — was closed because of its left orientation. The closing was engineered by the new director of the station in collusion with the largest West German radio station. The frequency was quickly assigned to a West Berlin sta- tion which immediately began broadcast- ing. > But because of the massive protests —in- cluding thousands of signatures collected at the rally fora petition demanding restoration of the station to the young people who had operated it — the station’s broadcasting rights were restored within hours of the rally. Joining PDS chair Gregor Gysi on the- platform at the rally were a member of the national executive committee of the Green Party of West Berlin, an officer from the GDR army, a Hamburg (West Germany) trade union leader, representatives of 80 teachers fired in the Marzahn district of Ber- lin and a leader of the Left Platform of West Germany which is part of the PDS electoral alliance. Gysi called for a “coming together of left forces and the building of a united socialist force.” He told the crowd to applause: “T will vote in the Bundestag against any measure not in the interests of the people of the GDR. You can’t push aside 40 years of history and gains of the German Democratic Republic.” That same theme was echoed at the PDS conference where some 1,000 delegates urged action the party across the country to build left unity, including united electoral action around the Left List-PDS electoral alliance. “Having us in Parliament means we do not brush any interest of the people under the carpet,” Gysi told the conference. “Having us in parliament means we will not accept any German centrist-nationalist sentiment undebated ... With us a future united Ger- many will face a true, serious, progressive opposition in parliament which is ready to eo-operate with all left, humanistic and democratic forces. “The people need such an opposition,” he declared. Earlier this month, reunification of the two Germanys was advanced another dec- isive step as representatives of governments in the GDR and the FRG signed a reunifica- tion treaty. It was subsequently ratified by i ee eS ee ee A ND ae ee EE > ORE SS ee eee ae, Fo ee “With us a future united Germany will face a true, serious, — progressive | opposition in Parliament which is ready to co-operate with all left, humanistic and democratic forces.” — Gregor Gysi the two parliaments, although with signif- icant opposition as the PDS and a large section of the Social Democrats voted against it in the GDR Bundestag. The 1,000-page document regulates everything from an Oct. 3 date for an all- German anniversary of unification day to future prospects for sports in East Germany. It covers virtually the entire range of nation- al life, from the environment through cul- ture, education, science, finances, health, election procedures and transportation to property rights. In its regulation of political and social matters, it wipes out many advances made under socialism in the GDR. It provides that all GDR law not consistent with the FRG constitution, the European Community or the treaty must be made to conform with West German law within five years. Some compromise was reached on the issue of abortion, however, as GDR pro- visions for abortion on demand up to the 12th week of pregnancy clashed directly with West German law which prohibits abortion except in special circumstances. The treaty permits the GDR practice to con- tinue until 1992. A major feature of the treaty concerns property rights. Former owners of property in the GDR have filed claims for return of their former property and government rep- resentatives have claimed that investment has not been up to expectation as a result. The treaty clears new investors of any such claims and provides that former owners or their heirs would be compensated in cash by the government. GDR Premier Lothar de Maiziere said that the provision could mean the influx of large-scale investment and could help to provide jobs. That is expected to become an issue quickly since unemployment, together with — the reduction of many full-time jobs to part- time, have suddenly become key problems in the GDR. Warning strikes by municipal employees were also recently staged by municipal employees as a protest against impending cuts in the public service. \