RESPECT PICKET LINES AT STAGEY'S FURNITURE The regional council is requesting that IWA members refrain from crossing the picket lines set up by the Teamsters’ Union at Stacey’s Furniture store on the lower mainland. The employer has fought a vicious fight to prevent his employees from winning a first collective agreement. Scabs have been hired to keep the store open and the employer has had the strikers harassed and assaulted on the picket line. The employees in the warehouse earned between $4.32 and $5.25 an hour prior to striking. The employer has shown no inter- est in negotiating and refuses to meet with the union. There are three stores involved in the dispute. The store on Marine Drive in Vancouver; one on King George Highway in Surrey; and the main store in Richmond. The employer operates under several names — Collingwood Services, Better Value Furniture and Valley Industries. The Stacey employees need the support of all trade unionists regardless if they are affiliated to the B.C. Federation of Labour or not. Give them your support by boycotting all Stacey Furniture outlets. PENSION FIGHTER STANLEY KNOWLES For two generations, Stanley Knowles has been pressing Parliament for a better deal for pensioners — a generation he now belongs to himself. The NDP Veterans Affairs and Pensions critic started his long battle to improve the status of older people in 1942. At that time, the government was paying outa maximum of $20 per month to those 70 years and older who were considered to be in need — and then only under pressure from the NDP (then CCF). Knowles says he recently checked old issues of Hansard and discovered that the first question he raised in the House con- cerning older people — it had to do with the widows of veterans of World War I — was back in 1943. “I was in character all right,” he says. The Winnipeg North Centre MP has been “in character” ever since. Knowles constantly defends his and his party’s policy that pensions should be paid universally to the elderly, without a demeaning means test. “We feel very strongly that the case is on the side of universality,” he says. “Some of the best legislation we’ve ever produced in the Parliament of Canada has been old age security and family allowance legislation that pays benefits to everyone by virtue of their being part of our society and part of our economy.” Knowles says a means test is unnecessary because less than 10 per cent of the elderly have sufficient income not to need the pension. For those who receive too much by getting benefits, the solution is to make appropriate adjustments in the income tax structure. “We think it is far better to pay those pensions and tax them back when neces- sary, than to impose a means or income test before you get it.” Knowles remembers how it was for the 12/Lumber Worker/October, 1980 2 IWA convention delegates visit picket line set up at the custom house in Vancouver by the members of the Public Service Alliance of Canada who went on strike September 29, to gain a COLA-protected wage increase and shorter work. Shown in picture from left are IWA members of Local 1-405, Lonnie Stuart, Don Sharpe, Lyle Kristiansen, NDP-MP, and Klass Offerman, Local 1st vice-president. tics, when monthly pensions were worth less than one week’s wages. “I was a minister then and I can remem- _ ber going into homes and finding old people there of whose existence I wasn’t aware. They didn’t even come to church,” he says. “They didn’t have the clothes.” To those who argue that the country can’t afford to raise pensions in the current bad economic times, Knowles has heard it all before. He says it is the same argument used on his predecessor, J. S. Woodsworth, when the latter advocated the $20 per month pension back in 1926. “What determines the capacity to pay pensions is not funds that have been put away,” he says. “It is the state of the economy at the time and I think we can afford to do better for our old people now and that we can do better still down the road.” The NDP advocates a minimum old age pension of $400 per month and the elimina- tion of the guaranteed income supplement. “It is proper that when people have served their 30 or 40 years as part of the economy, they should expect a decent living standard in old age,” he says. “We think universal pensions at a high level are a good idea and we’re going to stick with it until we get it.” ECONOMY REQUIRES EQUAL CONSIDERATION By ED BROADBENT NDP Federal Leader The NDP caucus has just completed two days of discussion on our MPs’ experience in their ridings during the summer and the agenda as we see it for the coming session of Parliament. It is evident that the Constitution is going to receive priority attention by the govern- ment. We as a party have already made our views known on a number of constitutional matters and we will be participating fullyin the debate in coming months. We also want, however, the government to elderly 40 years ago before he entered polli-. give the same kind of priority to a budget as to the Constitution. We recognize the need for constitutional change, but the economy requires equal consideration at this time. The common experience of virtually all our Members of Parliament during the summer was the growing sense of insecurity felt by Canadians about their economic future. They are insecure about lay-offs and plant shut-downs. They know the job they have today may be gone tomorrow. They are insecure about rising prices. They know they simply aren’t eating as well today as they were yesterday. They are insecure about themselves and their children. They feel for the first time that their backs are against the wall. In short, Canadians are deeply apprehen- sive and fearful about their present eco- nomic circumstance. They are doubtful about their ability to maintain their present standards, let alone get ahead. We believe that Parliament must recog nize these very human concerns and deal with them promptly to re-establish basic hope and confidence about the future. We need a People’s Package to deal with these very real economic insecurities. A People’s Package would have a fai: prices commission with the authority tc investigate price increases and order roll- backs where prices are found to be unjusti fied. Our tax credit proposal would see a regular annual tax adjustment related to the cost of living. This, unlike the Conservatives’ mainte: nance of the status quo indexation system, would give regular benefits to middle and low income Canadians. A permanent con mission would monitor and regulate pricir _ in the energy sector. ae We need economic growth policies in the economy now, when it is operating at its lowest capacity in some 15 years. Addin; . stimulus to the economy is not inflationary: It would produce jobs, cut welfare payments and increase tax revenues both from ind viduals and from corporations coming in the government. The state of the Canadian economy ‘: extremely serious. We need a stimulati> budget. My colleague, Bob Rae, our Finan — critic, has laid out in considerable detail! » number of measures that we favour fo inclusion in the budget. . If it is good enough for General Motors t have increases in expenditures in a give year in excess of revenues coming . because it has calculated that there’s goir ° to be a pay-off down the road, it makes equ. economic sense for countries at certain stages in the economic cycle to do precise’ the same thing. — = EE ee