the demand for freedom By William Pomeroy A. the question of independence for the Portuguese African colonies is brought nearer to realization, with the liberation movements in Mozambique, Angola and Guinea-Bissau pressing their struggle without let-up to make certain that the new regime in Portugal will carry out a real solution of the colonial problem, the first serious reactions of alarm have been displayed by the oppressive apartheid regime in South Africa. The liberation of Mozambique and Angola will bring Africa’s freedom move- ments directly to the border of the apart- heid state, which has collaborated with fascist Portugal in the past to keep a colon- ial buffer of white supremacy between itself and the independent African peoples. Since the overthrow of the fascist Caetano government in Portugal, therefore, the white dictatorship in South Africa has been tightening its suppressive system. In the coming ‘period, a free Angola will present the greatest problem to the South African rulers. For nearly a thousand miles the southern border of Angola touches the northern part of Namibia, the South West . African territory that is controlled illegal- ‘ly by South Africa. A Namibian independ- ence- movement, including a guerrilla liber- ation army, is strong precisely in this region, and it has good relations with the Angolan liberation movement, the MPLA. This movement is called the South West African People’s Organization (SWAPO). It has its greatest support among the Ovambo people, who comprise 342,000 of the 856,000 Black inhabitants of Namibia, although it has backing among the other tribal groups of the territory as well. As part of its apartheid policy, which not only divides Black from white but also seeks to split the Black population, South Africa has created segregated ‘‘Bantustan’”’ areas on a tribal basis, supposedly with a degree of autonomy. In Namibia this has also been done, and Ovamboland has been carved out as a Bantustan, headed, as has generally been the case, by hand-picked conservative tribal chieftains who collabor- ate with the white rulers. Ones has a 250-mile border with Angola: It is one of the colonial borders that criss-cross Africa, arbitrarily estab- lished by the imperialist powers, cutting across tribal areas and dividing related communities. Traditionally there has been much disregarded crossing of borders in normal herding, trading or shifting agri- culture, but it is only the recent movement of liberation forces that has made South Africa’s apartheid rulers consider it a “security frontier.”’ For the past three years Ovamboland has been a center of independence ferment. Ovambo contract laborers, hired and sent out to work in the United States, British, and West German-owned mines and in. dustries elsewhere in Namibia, were the main participants in the precedent-setting . Strikes that occurred throughout Namibia beginning in 1972. SWAPO played a leading organizing role in the strikes, which were against the semi-slave contract conditions, and the militancy they produced augment- PACIFIC TRIBUNE—FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 1974—PAGE 10 ed independence demands and a struggle against the collaborator tribal Bantustan chiefs themselves. SWAPO. for a number of reasons. has had both a semi-legal and an ufderground character in Namibia. The United Nations ~ has given a certain legitimacy to SWAPO by endorsing independence for South West Africa (to which it gave the name Namibia. not recognized by the South African rulers) and has formally demanded that South Africa relinquish its control over the terri- tory. South Africa’s refusal to heed the UN demand, and its arrest and imprisonment of SWAPO leaders on the notorious Robben Island, forced the movement to adopt guer- rilla armed struggle for liberation. Never- theless, it has still sought to pursue every possible legal avenue, in Bantustan elec- tions, in court battles. in representation before UN bodies, and other ways. ; The chief area of guerrilla struggle has been in and around Ovamboland, and in the Caprivi Strip, the neck of Namibian land that reaches across the top of Botswana to Zambia and Rhodesia. In the Caprivi Strip in particular, South African border police have suffered innumerable casualties from SWAPO ambushes and mining of roads. [. Ovamboland the growing strength of SWAPO has brought harsh retaliatory measures from the South African apartheid regime in Pretoria. The white commission- er-general, Jannie de Wet, appointed from pretoria as the actual power in Ovambo- land, encouraged the Black ‘‘front’’ chief minister of the Bantustan, Chief Philemon Elifas, to carry out mass punishments of SWAPO members and supporters. In the latter part of 1973 public floggings were introduced, ostensibly for an alleged com- mitting of ‘‘crimes.”’ Both men and women, with trousers lowered or dresses lifted, were severely beaten with 15 to 30 lashes from the flat or ridged side of a hard palm cane. Over 100 people were flogged in this way, a brutal punishment that evoked international pro- test of such scope that when Bishop Rich- ard Wood: of the Anglican Church and Bishop Leonard Auala of the Ovambo- Kuvano Lutheran Church filed a petition against the practice in the territorial Supreme Court in Windhoek, the Court is- sued a temporary interdict to halt the floggings. Testimonial affidavits signed by many of those punished showed that the floggings were inflicted for membership in SWAPO, for singing SWAPO songs, for wearing a shirt in SWAPO colors or with a SWAPO emblem, and for merely calling South West Africa “‘Namibia.’’ One youth who contributed 20 cents to SWAPO was given 15 strokes with the cane. A woman nurse in a mission hospital in Ovamboland told what happened to her and to a fellow nurse: ‘‘Rachel was the first to be flogged. She was compelled to lie over the chair in full view of all the members gathered, of men, women and children. Four policemen held her each by a limb...She was flogged with extreme violcnce. The policeman wielded the cane, using two hands, which he raised high in the air before striking. . .I was flogged in the same way. After my flogging I was hardly able to walk.” This form of treatment has not stopped -the spread of SWAPO and its demands for freedom. The increased prestige of the MPLA in Angola and the prospect of inde- pendence for the people just across the bor- der, fellow tribesmen in many cases, has raised higher the hopes of the people in Namibia. South Africa has shown its awareness of this in its new security moves. On June 14, the police units stationed in the Caprivi Strip were pulled out and replaced by reg- ular army units, the South African Minister of Defense, Piet Botha, announcing that “guerrilla warfare is endemic in the area now.’ On June 30, it was announced that the first South African army officer, a regular army lieutenant, had been killed by guerrillas in the Caprivi Strip. At the same time instructions were sent by the Pretoria regime to vat land's collaborator chiefs. directilB yy) recruiting of Black guards to pat border with Angola. This was part® is general crack-down in Ovamboland ag SWAPO. is Floggings have been resumes vf temporary court order expired al ginning of March 1974. First of t wave of floggings was a 20-stroke Pg ment delivered to a SWAPO na Salmon Ndulita. for calling the 7 ‘minister of education” a ‘Black Bo k Fresh trials of SWAPO leaden a the vicious South African Terrorist began simultaneoulsy in Windhoek. oi on trial were David Merero. nation “f man of SWAPO in Namibia. E2e v4 opi, chairman of the SWAPO | eeagic: Joseph Sashea. the Youth Vi secretary, and others: the a f League leaders have been held I cal) conditions of solitary confineme their arrest in January. | rere 3) The terror in Ovamboland. bi ph Fe sorship has prevented full deta eit thy known, has led to an exodus from aj of increasing numbers of people. ret Ch July up to 600 had crossed the b? Angola. Among them was the Aa A leader in Ovamboland. John ©) ail said the people were fleeing the ves of the tribal rulers’ and the “SY P of political opposition.” fs More significant than the nur the exodus (which South Africas icf ( tempt to conceal the real sup PT he i sons, declared was intended for oja | ing by SWAPO instigators 1n ae ia | force against their people in Ova cll I is the fact that they reportedly © : in Py ai most all the educated Namiblal ig a northern part of the country a é is] Uti post office workers, clerks, nUIS 9 i Pre employees, vocational students 4 pres k South Africa’s new wave of ert yr] a measures and terrorism in Nam sl Me scores the need for internation4 int Dey for SWAPO's freedom strueey bn need for the United Nations © aif its previous demand for South AM it i} bs out of Namibia and to reinfor’ ye 1, sanctions against the apartheid! “> Sechabs uy