Wixten
PEO TL UN.

beet y
egy
Rone
PATNA

2

provision of public access to the water front to the satisfaction Of
the Municipality;

consideration being given to provide a small landing area for boats,
gpened to the public;

satisfaction. of the concerns expreased by the Building Department and
contained in the body of this report;

resolution of fire protection issues to the satisfaction of the Fire
Department; and

the applicant being advised that Council will not consider a
relaxation of parking requirements nor cash in lieu of parking to
meet bylaw requirements. .

Application 12/90 for rezoning of the property from C~1 to Comprehensive
Development was received on February 14, 1990.

The proposed use of the property was a five-unit« residential building, and
plans were attached te the application. . .

Upon being advised that the Planning Department could not support. the
application without the benefit of a broader look at the area, the applicants
modified their application. On December 7, 1990, the application was —

.. resubmitted, now with a proposed use ef a "Water Development Restaurant and 3
Condos". | | | | |
On February 5, 1990 the applicants also submitted an application to the Fraser .
River Harbour Commission to lease the water lot fronting their property and to
undertake the following construction activities: "pile driving for floats and
construction of walkway". : _ -_ eee

This application was referred to the City of Port Coquitlam and on. February *
19, 1990 the Municipal Council passed a resolution requesting the Fraser River
Harbour Commission to hold the applications im abeyance pending further input.

from Port Coquitlam. — a ; : 7 . a

vy

On or around August 27, 1990, having been informed that the above-noted
walkway was under construction, the Planning Department contacted the Fraser
River Harbour Commission and was informed that the Commission had exercised
their authority and approved the walkway construction to proceed. :
_ On January 30, 1991, at the request of the applicants, the Director of
_. | Planning referred preliminary drawings of the current proposal for a
restaurant, lounge and 3 residential units constructed over a pier to the .
~~. Planning Committee for preliminary input. The Committee requested that the.
- applicant be informed that the Committee was "supportive in principle of their
concept, however was not prepared to recommend Council Co approve the =
deve lopment of any additional property in that area until an Area Control Plan
is developed and approved by Council". The applicant was to be further eae
informed that "the Area Control Plan is not in the work program for this year
(1991) for lack of funding". a a EO te