. wi ap : 1ocent until prov - When sexual abuse charges are laid, the accused can become the victim Most people are outraged when they first hear of the activities of people like Robert Willoughby or Clifford Olson. At the time of their trials, their sordid acts were well-documented in the press, and people were asking: “How can this happen? What sort of person would do these kinds of things to children?’’ by Tod Strachan “They must be stopped,’ was the public cry for justice. And since that time Willoughby, Olson and many others like them have been stopped. They’re in jail. Since those trials, though, a growing number of cases involv- ing varying degrees of child sex- ual abuse have been héard in Canadian courtrooms. And in each case, what was believed to - be an appropriate sentence has been handed down. In each case the legal process was carried out under full public scrutiny and sentences were handed down with the full approval of society. More than approval, perhaps even a sense of revenge. It’s unlikely society will ever welcome these people back. But,there is a negative side to ‘the public’s perception of the acts‘of Willoughby and Olson. They have, for many, become the stereotype sexual abuser. - Their fate has become an exam- ple of the harsh treatment awaiting other deviates .of this sort who. are unable to control their behavior. This is society's _ censure and deterrent, but it also raises questions about the pur- . pose and operation of the justice system, A case in point could be the Kelowna teacher currently seek- ing re-entrance to his profession. According to our justice system, he has paid for his crime and ‘should be allowed to work. Un- _ trusting parents, however, see things differently. This is a pro- blem that’s going to get worse before it gets any better and it’s a problem that needs to be dealth with. What are we going to do with offenders who say they’ve learned their lesson? Of- fenders who say they will ‘‘never do it again’’? Can they ever be trusted? Some people may have. pondered . this question, but most have probably concluded that an answer just doesn’t exist. The majority, though, are ap- parently of the view that there’s nothing to debate. The sexual abuse of children, they say, is ‘tantamount to murder and while Our justice system founders in philosophical debate, ‘social justice must maintain a standard of swift, firm and unforgiving . punishment. What’s wrong with this posi- tion, however, is the fact that it most often leads to the assump- tion that the accused is guilty | before: bs being tried. With what could be described as a fear- driven, lynch-mob mentality it’s possible for the accused found innocent by law to be guilty for life in the eyes of his. peers. So great is this fear of the child molester that our society places great pressure on the legal system to indiscriminately ex- tricate anyone tainted with an accusation from our com- munities. This cry for blind justice, however, may have caused unintended but irreparable damage to those same com- munities it was designed to pro- tect. Not only has it created a phenomenon that some describe as a ‘“‘witch hunt”, it may in- advertently have placed the most effective disciplinary weapon ever devised: in:the hands of-our ° children. The common belief ‘that “Children don’t lie about these things’? may be in need of re- examination. ‘The child who has been scorned by a parent, guar- dian or caregiver has only to say, ‘*He abused me,’ to set the heavy wheels of justice in mo- tion. . Sorting out the truth in these matters is difficult. It’s the word of the adult against the child, How are we to determine the truth? More -improtantly, how are we going to treat the accused before he’s proven quilty? The following article tells the story of one local father who was charged with sexual abuse but found innocent by a judge and jury. The child had lied. The father, though, still lives with the stigma of the accusation and tremendous costs of his defense. Could this happen to you? The cost of caring Have you ever sexually abused a child? It may not matter. It seems that you could be accused and charged anyway. In fact you could end up before a judge and jury, and, if you're not suc- cessful in your defense... in jail. This is the story of foster family in-the Terrace area and the devastation caused by a lie. It doesn’t matter, though, that it was a faster family. The accused could just as easily been the natural father, the grandfather, baby sitter, -minister or a teacher. The important facts are that an innocent man was accus- ed, charged and tried. Even though the justice system work- ed and. his innocence. proven, he’s left with a $12,000 bill for his defence and no hope of recovering his loss. And he’s not the first. . (This is a true story but names, dates and any details not impor- tant to the issues involved have been changed to avoid identify- ing innocent persons.) Almost a decade ago, a young Terrace couple decided they would like to be foster parents. They had no children of their own and the idea they could help children in need was attractive to them. They were soon offered four children, ages six to 11. The natural mother was an alcoholic and due to.neglect.the children had been made wards of the court. This meant a long-term placement, and the new parents. couldn’t have been happier. ‘“‘We fully expected the children to be with us until they were able to function on their own as young adults,’’ recalls their foster mother. But this vision of a normal, happy family wasn’t to last long. As, wards of the court. the: children were listed in the: pro- vincial adoption bulletin. In this bulletin they were described as ‘“special needs”? children. This fact was known to the parents when they were considering fostering the four children, but having no experience it meant little to them. Besides, the children seemed normal enough and social workers hadn’t made a point of emphasizing the fact that they were special needs children, so why worry? It wasn’t long, though, before the full implications of dealing with the term ‘special needs’? became apparent. All four children were about two to three years behind in their emotional and intellectual development. When they first arrived, the new parents discovered that the children had difficulty following even the simplest of directions; communication skills and per- sonal hygiene were poor. Most’ affected was the youngest. “At the age of six Danny was only able to speak three understandable words,”’ recalls the foster mother. speech problem.” ; In addtion to this, because of some of the things they were told by the children, they also believ- - ed that eight-year-old Brenda had been sexually assaulted at an early age. They asked for help but, ‘‘Social Services did very little to give us emotional sup- port in dealing with the children.’? A tremendous chal- lenge was before them, but they cared for the children and anything else didn’t seem to matter. They had every reason to believe that with a little love Brenda, “Social Ser- _ vices told us he had a ‘slight’ | and a good home these children would soon overcome their dif- ficulties. ‘But it wasn’t going to be easy. Due to the hardships they had suffered early ‘in life the three younger children fought and lied: continually. Carol, the second youngest, eventually improved: but Danny, and particularly “Brenda continually undermin-. ed all attempts for us to survive as a happy family,” recalls the mother. ‘‘She was extremely jealous of Carol and physically and mentally abused her.’’ In time though, Allan, the oldest, and Carol and Danny became very attached to their new parents. They were becom- ing a family. But the constant undermining by Brenda con- tinued, and after three years of effort the foster parents finally asked that she be removed from the home. They felt it was in the best interest of the other three. But his wouldn't be allowed. “The all go or they all stay,” the mother says she was told by a social worker. So, unable to give up the three, they kept all four. - Two years later, the mother’s health was failing and again the parents asked Social Services to remove Brenda. of my husband’s was an ex- perienced foster parent and was willing to take the two girls,” recalls the mother. ‘“We hated to see Carol go. But that’s the only way . Social Services would agree.’ Brenda and Carol stayed « at their new home for a year and half but finally had to be moved because of physical violence of failed to respond. “A co-worker » Terrace Review — Wednesday, January 3, 1990 15 Brenda towards. Carol. “‘They have been in another home for two years and are still together,”’ says the original foster mother. And, “Brenda has inflicted deep sears on Carol’s arms.’ She says ‘she made several attempts to have the girls separated, but as it was put to her by one social worker, ‘‘Sisters should be together. ” Still, the original foster parents tried to maintain contact between the children and occa- sionally invited the girls to their home to visit their brothers. This - seemed to work well for about four years, “The girls came will- ingly and happily to see us and their brothers,”’ she recalled — until about two years ago, when -Brenda failed to show up for-a Christmas Eve visit. After many years of tension, this was the last straw. The girls were almost 10 years older now and their Original foster mother felt they were old enough to decide for themselves if they wished to maintain contact. “T felt I could show preferen- tial treatment to Carol and not feel too guilty,’ she says, and a little over a month later took Carol and her older brother out to dinner. Exactly nine days later, the RCMP were looking for her hus- band. She was told that Brenda had filed charges of sexual. assault and that, ‘‘Young. children don’t lie.”? Brenda was 17 at the time and the complaint was made less than a week after her evening out with Carol and Allan. As a result of Brenda’s com- continued on page 17 Teachers in fear of abuse charges False accusations of sexual abuse laid against teachers by their students have become a growing cause for alarm and concem, ac- cording to the president of the Terrace District Teachers’ Association. Greig Houlden said during an interview in December that the problem has become serious enough that the B.C. Teachers’ Federation has struck a task force to deal with it. Unfounded accusations of sexual abuse are invariably devastating to the professional and personal lives of teachers, even when the accused is found innocent in court. Houlden says he knows of at least two teachers in the Northwest “whose careers were terminated, even with exoneration... the impact is severe, it’s an extremely serious problem.’” The provincial government has been lauded for the establish- ment of an anonymous, toll-free reporting line for child abuse, but authorities tend to downplay the impact of what they term “vexatious complaints’ called in by people, both adults and chil- dren, who have revenge on their minds. Houlden says the prob- lem is not in the reporting system, however, but in the investiga- tion procedures and the way charges are laid. “There seems to be an ad hoc policy on the part of authorities to air the charges publicly and wait for other complainants to come forward,” he said. He described the investigating procedure as a “lockstep policy that handcuffs the (school) board’. Ministry of Education policy, he said, requires school or district administrators to report all allegations — without investigating them — to the Ministry of Social Services and housing, who are required to go directly to the RCMP. Once the RCMP are involved, he stated, “there is no pretense of confidentiality,”’ Even if the courts subsequently find that the charges should never have been brought forward, he said, careers are still ruined by “suspicion, rumor and mistrust’’. “This kind of stigma carries a lot of weight,” he said. -Houlden noted that the TDTA is in the process of addressing & Solashy the issue with School District 88 administration, ‘‘Teachers are: feeling very valnerable}?\ke suid. HaGKORD leon alt ia ager od vision deidqe pet)