aR ee ee on Trudeau is front man for the imperialists By WILLIAM KASHTAN Under the pretense of pursuing an independent foreign policy, the Canadian government is in fact acting as front man for U.S.A, and British imperialism. This is to be seen in Prime Minis- ter Trudeau’s position at the Commonwealth Conference at Singapore and External Affairs Minister Sharp’s statement on the escalation of war in Laos. One would have thought, fol- lowing the invasion of Laos by South Vietnamese troops backed by the U.S., that the Canadian government would have con- demned this escalation and also the breach by American imper- ialism of neutrality based on the Geneva Agreements of 1954 and 1962. This it did not do. Instead, it piously criticised the breach of neutrality and by inference declared the Democratic Repub- lic of Vietnam responsible. U.S. intervention in Laos was not even mentioned by Mr. Sharp, a fact that was noted by the capitalist press. The hypo- crisy of his statement about breaches of neutrality can be seen in the fact that Canada con- , tinues to sell over $300 million worth of arms to the U.S. which are used against the Vietnamese and Cambodian peoples and now against the people of Laos. The Canadian government in making the proposal to reactiv- ate the International Control Commission is acting for U.S. imperialism. What it should be doing is calling for withdrawal of U.S. troops from all Indochina. It is unfortunate that Mr. An- drew Brewin, the New Demo- cratic Party spokesman on for- eign affairs, took a_ position which veered closely to that of External Affairs Minister Sharp. The last NDP convention called upon U.S. imperialism to with- draw from Vietnam and express- ed full support for its people. Why is Mr. Brewin reneging on that position? He and the NDP group in Parliament should be pressing on the government to insist on immediate U.S. with- drawal from all Indochina, and should call upon labor and the people to do likewise. ; The Trudeau government also acted as front man for British imperialism at the Singapore Commonwealth Conference. It was Prime Minister Trudeau who, according to press reports, worked out the formula which in effect gave British imperialism a way out so that it will now be able to sell arms to South Africa. Instead of uniting with the African states and peoples in sharp condemnation of British imperialist support of apartheid and the: military rearming of South Africa—which could have been accomplished at this con- ference—the Canadian govern- ment took an opposite course aimed in effect at strengthening British imperialist policy and South African apartheid. This despite the Canadian govern- ment’s pretense at criticism of those policies. Today, President Nixon claims that the extension to Laos of the U.S. war against Vietnam and Cambodia is directed to ensure the security and withdrawal of American troops from Indochina. This hypocritical and dangerous statement could well be used to attack China on the grounds that it is endangering the security of U.S. troops. More immediately, it could be used for an all-out attack on the Democratic Repub- lic of Vietnam itself. — In the name of withdrawing American troops from Indochina, U.S. imperialism is in fact esca- lating the war, extending it to the whole of Indochina with all its dangerous consequences for peace and security in Southeast Asia. One should have no illu- sions about U.S. imperialism’s aims. Its. Vietnamization policy, its “Asian fight Asian” policy, has one objective — to secure complete dominance by Amer- ican imperialism in that part of the world and to bring about, not a political settlement, but a military solution. In light of the increased dan- gers precipitated by U.S. and British imperialism, actions and statements by the Canadian government - supporting them need to be sharply condemned. They are against the real inter- ests of the Canadian people and against the interests of peace and security on a world scale. Most urgently, all peace forces, the labor, democratic and trade -union movements should unite their -efforts for the de- mand that U.S. imperialism with- draw now from Indochina. ~ PACIFIC TRIBUNE—FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 1971—PAGE 6 He a ee ce Pioneer Communist Z —< ee. ee rs i Life story of Roy Reid By WILLIAM BEECHING This year we are celebrating 50 years of the Communist movement in Canada. Roy Reid, who died recently in Saskatoon, was one of the Communist Par- ty’s pioneers. His life was inti- mately interwoven with the opening of the West, the crea- tion of a Prairie economy, and the building of the labor and farm unions and_ co-operative movements. : He was a small farmer—he homesteaded at Rabbit Lake in the early 1900’s, earning money by working out. “By 1919 I had quit trying to grow wheat,” he wrote. “The oats on the summerfallow got a a good start that year. How- ever, they came in late because of the weather. That December we used sleighs threshing, dig- ging the stooks out of the snow. ‘the summerfallow oats kept al- right, but the late oats had too much moisture in them, and a big bin of them spoiled in spite of all I could do to save them. After that I did a bit of figuring. I was in debt pretty badly, pay- ing 8% interest on a lot too much money, 40 miles from town. My Marxist studies had led me to expect that with the end of the war the bottom. was apt:to go out of the cattle mar-, ket. So I made a decision to sell out while there was still a fair price for cattle, and go to work in the coal mines. “My sale was held on April 13, 1920. I paid my debts, ex- cept for the mortgage on the land, and I headed West. In Ed- monton I joined the Socialist Party of Canada and the One Big Union, In my thinking I was pretty far Left. I booked for. a job in the old-fashioned hiring hall, paid a dollor for it. The job was loading coal by contract into box cars with a wheel-bar- row at the old open-pit ‘Mile- 47’ mine. The work was hard.” From that job, he moved on to another mine where he push- ed coal cars by hand, with a promise of a “place digging as soon as there was an opening.” Some vivid chapters in Cana- dian working-class history were written by the striking Alberta coal miners in the early 1920’s. While still at Rabbit Lake as a farmer, Roy Reid had argued his way into the Communist movement as it was then — groups that brought literature with them from the British Isles and Europe, met to discuss the | questions of the day. Roy Reid, always a lively thinker, joined in the debates and “studied in order to defeat them,” and in. the process of studying and de- bating, he recognized the logic of their position and joined them. He developed a deep-going re- spect for ideas, for revolution- ary books and newspapers. “Some time during the sum- mer of 1921,’ he has written, “TI bought from the labor news stand in Edmonton the book, Red Europe. My impression of it was very favorable, so I bought 10 copies with a view to reselling them to friends. That was when people began think- ing of me as a salesman of Red literature. The books went like -hot cakes, and I sold several lots of them.” Forty years later he was do- ing exactly that when he got hold of a good book, pamphlet, or worker’s paper. When near- ly 80 years of age, he was Sas- katchewan’s outstanding sales- man of the Canadian Tribune, and won a national prize ‘as the best subscription getter. At that age, he was still able to recruit youngsters of 18 and 19 to the movement he loved so dearly. During the early 1920’s the birth of the world’s first social- ist state held the attention of the entire world—could it succeed? Could it survive? Could the working-class govern itself? To- day the attention of the entire world is rivetted on the same centre of socialism, but with new questions: will the USSR succeed in its efforts to prevent a third world war? Will it catch up and surpass the most advanc- ed capitalist country in the world, the U.S.? What is the secret of the enormous scientific and cultural advance made by the Soviet peoples in barely more than 50 years? In 1921, Roy Reid, joined the Association for Technical Aid to Soviet Russia, an organization which assisted Soviet workers to master technique in the early days of building the Soviet state. He took part in the 1921 pro- vincial elections that returned the United Farmers of Alberta to power—his local of the Uni- ted Mine Workers held an elec- tion meeting to which all can- didates were invited. “Lenin’s book, Left-Wing Com- munism, an Infantile Disorder, first published in English by the B.C. Federationalist, reached me, and I read it before the. strike started on April 11, 1922,” he wrote, “I felt that Lenin was writing for my benefit. I reread the book and studied it.” In 1926, driven by his love for literature, he took over the La- bor News Stand in Edmonton. For a short time he was helped by another veteran worker- farmer, E. R. Fay. A young wo- man with two children, Mrs. Flossie Fraser, came to assist in the work on a day in June in 1926. Co-operation in selling socialist ideas soon led to per- sonal love and understanding. Roy and Flossie were married. In 1929 the Reids and their children moved to Rabbit Lake to resume farming. He was a small farmer and fought for the small farmers with same class- consciousness and ardor as he fought the struggles of the Al- berta coal miners, He was in the farmers’ union, and took part in farm strikes and demonstrations. He was part of that great movement that Western miners gather for parade. elected Dorise W. Nielsen % a people’s unity candidate, fro pr Spiritwood, during World War! | I walked side by side Wie him for many miles in Pe'So demonstrations when he was £ipr ing on for 80. When he retll® de from the farm to live in Sas pr toon, he did not retire from ‘th public activity. ty A growing number of today ec young people are doing th0®0r same things with all the passidt and vigor of youth, in the sau aa spirit . displayed by the Si Reids—the miners and farm of yesterday. He always saw tial the job that needed doing W ™ done, even when it was unpoP @ lar, drawing upon spiritual HA serves of courage to do it. dl tells in his notes about wi he voted for an Italian wor to have a special job over ak, head of an Anglo-Saxon calm date: “We were sure outvol@iy Ir he wrote, “but we were TIg™"" ‘. What kind of man is it via. simple in his origins and -of living, can rise to play (7 — role history calls on each © I of us to do? ER | This is an extraordinary tit in the life of our country; 4) ~ mankind everywhere. It mn) period of history marked we? great social upheavals and 17° emergence of a new social ie tem, in which people come int t when man becomes really say @ man. The meaning of Roy R@a) life lies in the fact that he Chl the Marxist-Leninist path pe it guided him in everything 7 did. io When history came kn0Ch at his door with its many eit J he opened it wide, welcotg § mt C ms — SY OD ctf the struggle. He saw the CO” 14 diction between great Wig and poverty, between good i ing and bad, and he took oil side of the poor, pointing that a society that created po erty had to be changed. He ed hypocrisy, and held-!? ig greatest contempt all those i try to justify injustice, explo (0. tion and war. He felt that ig | preach brotherly love betw iy the robber and the robbed 9 } { : ~ loa wigs palo hee perpetuates the robbing. eft Roy Reid lived up to i Burns’ measuring stock yd “good”. Burns said, “V ah mitigates the woes or inch is) the happiness of others, 1 qi) my criterion of goodneS5: gl) whatever injures society ih | large, or any individual nity this is my measure of inld™ == WANTS DIALOGUE ON NIXON IMPEACHMENT i SAN MATEO—Paul N. “Pete” McCloskey wants a “nation®l vj) logue” on whether President Nixon should be impeached. McC is a Republican, and a Korea war veteran who won nationa ary minence when he defeated Shirley Temple Black in a GOP pri McCloskey told Stanford University students that the POSS!” iq of an impeachment is slim; but “if we started to discuss iS os? to ae i bit peachment,” Nixon might change his policy in Indochina. McCl hose said that “what we are doing in Laos is as great a crime aS pe we-executed Japanese’ and German officers for in World W!i |