Editorial Tories the minority ~ Many of us still remember the aftershock of the 1988 Tory election victory. We recall the feeling of frustration and anger watching Brian Mulroney’s victory night celebration where he and his corporate pals gloated at having bought their way to a second term in office with the biggest infusion of money and media blitz ever seen in federal politics. We can still taste the bitterness of knowing the anti-free trade forces, after a magnificent campaign and unprecedented unity, took more votes than the Tories — but lost the election. And we remember the added grim fact: By utilizing Canada’s undemocratic electoral set-up, the Tories parleyed a minority of votes into a majority government. The rest of the story, as they say, is history. The Free Trade Agreement, centrepiece of the country’s opposition in the 1988 campaign, was rammed through Parliament by this Tory “majority”. Canada’s passenger rail system was destroyed — again in the face of a massive public outcry — by this “majority.” The list goes on and on, culminating in the shoving of the Goods and Services Tax down the country’s throat by this “majority” which knew full well that only they and the corporate elite which bought them power in 1988 backed the GST. Not surprisingly then, some submissions to Royal Commission on Electoral Reform and Party Financing, now touring Canada, are raising the basic issues of how Canadian votes are counted, how our elections are run, who has access to the media and, key to it all, what kind of parliamentary system we need to ensure the fullest democracy. Presenting the views of the Communist Party on these matters, party leader George Hewison argued for a new electoral system of democratic proportional representation which would encourage a wide political diversity in parliament. He spoke in favour of a bi-cameral parliament consisting of the Commons and an elected senate based on equal representation from English Canada and Quebec, with strong representation from aboriginal peoples and equality from provinces and territories. The CPC’s submission also addressed how elections are fought, pointing to the present monopoly over the process by the so-called major parties and the virtual inability of smaller and special interest parties to be effectively heard due toa discriminatory law on political broadcasting. Financing and registration of parties also form part of the process sorely in need to change to break the present cosy arrangement. Rightly so, we Canadians take our voting seriously. Five years is a long time to wonder what happened and why. The issues are too crucial to continue witha outdated system which miraculously turns a minority of ballots into a majority of seats. Si. b00 WOKK ERC HAVE WALKED OUT © BECAUSE WE SUSPENDED | A SHOP STEWARD Fok SWEARING r sPeecH AT GM FREE DOM O TRIBONE Published weekly at - 2681 East Hastings Street EDITOR Sean Griffin Vancouver, B.C., V5K 1Z5 ASSOCIATE EDITOR Phone: (604) 251-1186 Fax: (604) 251-4232 Dan Keeton Ninakes BUSINESS & CIRCULATION MANAGER Subscripts. rate; ‘ = Canada: @ $20 one year @ $35 Mike P roniuk two years ® Foreign $32 one year. GRAPHICS Second class mail registration number 1560 Angela Kenyon pr that even the anti-people jugger- naut in Ottawa isn’t unstoppable in its drive to create a brave new world of reac- tion was the victory recently scored by women’s community activists. After weeks of demonstrations and sit-ins — an action that should inspire “the labour movement to greater effort — at Secre- tary of State offices on both coasts, the Tory government caved in early this month and partially reinstated funds to women’s programs chopped in its Febru- ary budget. : In restoring $1.2 million of the $1.6 mil- lion axed by Finance Minister Michael Wilson, the Conservatives hoped to cool some of the heat generated by the closure of several women’s resource centres in British Columbia, and centres and pro- jects elsewhere. But it’s only for one year — for 1991-1992, Ottawa will call on the provinces to kick in funds, according to the minister responsible for the status of women, Mary Collins. Given the track record of provincial Tory governments and clones, there will likely be new battles once the next fiscal year comes nigh. Notwithstanding this small but signifi- cant victory, other projects that empower Canadian women are still in peril. The $400,000 that remains cut would have supported several publications that effec- tively spoke for women’s rights (along with lobby organizations). The Vancouver Status of Women’s monthly tabloid, Kine- sis, is one journal whose future is cloudy. Others include three top rated magazines, all based in Toronto: Canadian Women Studies/Les cahiers de la femme; Resources for Feminist Research; and Healthsharing. Collectively, they’ve lost almost $200,000 in funding, after suffering a 15-per-cent cut in the previous year’s budget. Those figures come from Masthead magazine, a trade journal for publications, which reports the magazines are desper- ately seeking financing from other sour- ces. Masthead notes, however, that the publishers are not taking the cuts lying down: they’ve urged readers to send letters to Prime Minister Brian Mulroney and Secretary of State Gerry Weiner, and have criticized Collins, whom they term, “the minister irresponsible for the status of women.” Ironically, Masthead notes, Canadian Women Studies had received a letter from the former status of women minister, Bar- bara McDougall, in January praising the magazine for “remarkable quality” and wishing the publishers and staff “many more years of success.” Masthead writes that “the federal government’s true feelings towards Cana- dian feminist magazines were revealed in hard numbers” in the February budget cuts. We note too that the government’s feelings were revealed back when it decided to fund, over a national outcry, the reactionary REAL Women organiza- tion. REAL Women has gone on to greater notoriety in recent months for its mailing to members — funded by the Socreds — of material displaying homo- People and Issues phobic and anti-feminist sentiments. Federally and provincially, we face governments with agendas that include more than deregulating and privatizing. They’re aiming at the very thoughts that oppose their agenda, and such actions demand a united, emphatic response. * * ok € wrote last month about Mark Curtis, the U.S. packing house worker who is serving 25 years for rape and burglary in Des Moines, lowa. And we pointed out that the jailing of the 31- year-old union activist and_ solidarity worker was almost certainly motivated by his political activities — which included protesting racism and brutality in the local police force. We think the words of 79-year-old Edna Griffin, a Des Moines civil rights activist, sum it up: “This is not a case about rape. It is about the case of immigrant workers. Mark Curtis is a dangerous man in my opinion because he speaks Spanish and can communicate with the immigrant workers and (has) worked ‘side by side with them in the Swift plant.” __- Speaking for the effort to free Curtis — which is supported by several prominent - Canadians and others worldwide — is his ‘wife, Kate Kaku, who comes to Vancouver: ~ on Saturday, June 2, 8 p.m. at the Langara Student Union Building of Vancouver: Community College, 100 West 49th-Ave. ° (It is preceded by a reception at 7 p.m.). Also speaking are local people including prisoners’ rights activist Claire Culhane, student activist Pam Frache, local African National Congress representative George sais Amnesty International’s Frances MacQueen, and Mike Barker of the Hos- pital Employees Union. Donations are $5 and $3. Plans are also under way for Kaku to speak at meetings on Vancouver Island. The local Suppor- ters of the Mark Curtis Defence Committee is at 1053 Kingsway, Vancouver V5V 3C7, phone 872-3314. * * Ok Gores to the family of Tribune reader Charles Vernon Turner, who was in his 99th year when he passed away in New Westminster on April 16. Turner, a confirmed socialist, was born Nov. 4, 1891, in Bottineau, N.D., of par- ents who had emigrated. from Kent County in southwestern Ontario. The family later moved to Mountain Home, Idaho, where his parents contributed to the defence of Big Bill Haywood and other officials of the Western Federation of Miners, framed on charges of murdering the state’s ex-governor. ,__.In 1907 Turner moved his family to Salmon Arm, where he operated a garage and hosted many unemployed activists in the Thirties, including Steve Brodie. He was a local representative of the B.C. Peace Council following World War II. Turner was predeceased by his wife and three children, and is survived by several grandchildren and great-grandchildren. 4 » Pacific Tribune, May 21, 1990