March 18th, 1974 | /5.

From the Planning & Zoning Committee, March 15th, 1974, recommending that Plan.& Zon.

Comm. -
Application R#1-74 to rezone property at 777-83-91 Prairie Avenue from RS--2 Appin. R#1L~

74
(One-Family Suburban Residential) to RS-1 (One-Family Residential) to permit sub-
division for residential purposes, be rejected as the Committee feels that the
approximately 324 building lots available in the City is a sufficient supply for

ae"

Moved by Alderman Ranger:

Seconded by Alderman Mabbett:

That as recommended in a report from the Planning & Zoning Committe, March
15th, 1974, Application R#1-74 to rezone preperty at 777~-83-91 Prairie Avenue
from RS-2 (One-Family Suburban Residential) to RS-1 (Cne-Family Residential) be
rejected, : ; Carried.
From the Planning & Zoning Committee, March L5th, 1974, recommending that Plan.& Zon.

Comm.-
Application K#4-74 to rezone property at 2365 Kitchener Street as a Development Appla.R#4-

Area to construct 16 townhouse units under a Land Use Contract with a possibil- “
ity of conversion to strata title be rejected at this time as the proposal would
produce a development in excess of normal residential density on the site which

is just under one and a half acres; in addition, there is a chance that the dev-
elopment may interfere with the future subdivision of land lying to the West,

being 2389 Kitchener Street.

Moved by Alderman Ranger:

Seconded by Alderman Keryluk:

That as recommended in a report from the Planning & Zoning Committee, March
15th, 1974, Application R#4-74 to rezone property at 2365 Kitchener Street as a
development area to construct 16 town-house units under a Land Use Contract with

a possibility of conversien to strata title, be rejected at this time. Carried.

From the Planning & Zoning Committee, March 15th, 1974 advising of a request Pian.& Zon

Comm.re prog
received from the owner of property located at 1460 Victoria Drive to review the ~-posed sng

: ; fam.dwell
present Zoning By-law with respect to RS-2 (One-Family Suburban Residential) zon- 1460 Victor§

-ia Drive
ing as it applies to theconstruction of single family dwellings, and referring
to an amendment made primarily to control construction on 33~foot lots, but not

necessarily intended to restrict construction on larger parcels. The Committee

advised that the lot in question is slightly under one half an acre with approx-

© acacery 80 feet of frontage on the intersection of Ulster and Victoria Drive,

and is also fully serviced; further, that the Committee feeis the owner should
be permitted to build the dwelling on this lot and recenmending that the front
120 feet of the parcel be rezoned to. RS-1 (One~Family Residential) and, in addi-

tion, as it was net the intention of the By-law to control construction on larger