March 18th, 1974 | /5. From the Planning & Zoning Committee, March 15th, 1974, recommending that Plan.& Zon. Comm. - Application R#1-74 to rezone property at 777-83-91 Prairie Avenue from RS--2 Appin. R#1L~ 74 (One-Family Suburban Residential) to RS-1 (One-Family Residential) to permit sub- division for residential purposes, be rejected as the Committee feels that the approximately 324 building lots available in the City is a sufficient supply for ae" Moved by Alderman Ranger: Seconded by Alderman Mabbett: That as recommended in a report from the Planning & Zoning Committe, March 15th, 1974, Application R#1-74 to rezone preperty at 777~-83-91 Prairie Avenue from RS-2 (One-Family Suburban Residential) to RS-1 (Cne-Family Residential) be rejected, : ; Carried. From the Planning & Zoning Committee, March L5th, 1974, recommending that Plan.& Zon. Comm.- Application K#4-74 to rezone property at 2365 Kitchener Street as a Development Appla.R#4- Area to construct 16 townhouse units under a Land Use Contract with a possibil- “ ity of conversion to strata title be rejected at this time as the proposal would produce a development in excess of normal residential density on the site which is just under one and a half acres; in addition, there is a chance that the dev- elopment may interfere with the future subdivision of land lying to the West, being 2389 Kitchener Street. Moved by Alderman Ranger: Seconded by Alderman Keryluk: That as recommended in a report from the Planning & Zoning Committee, March 15th, 1974, Application R#4-74 to rezone property at 2365 Kitchener Street as a development area to construct 16 town-house units under a Land Use Contract with a possibility of conversien to strata title, be rejected at this time. Carried. From the Planning & Zoning Committee, March 15th, 1974 advising of a request Pian.& Zon Comm.re prog received from the owner of property located at 1460 Victoria Drive to review the ~-posed sng : ; fam.dwell present Zoning By-law with respect to RS-2 (One-Family Suburban Residential) zon- 1460 Victor§ -ia Drive ing as it applies to theconstruction of single family dwellings, and referring to an amendment made primarily to control construction on 33~foot lots, but not necessarily intended to restrict construction on larger parcels. The Committee advised that the lot in question is slightly under one half an acre with approx- © acacery 80 feet of frontage on the intersection of Ulster and Victoria Drive, and is also fully serviced; further, that the Committee feeis the owner should be permitted to build the dwelling on this lot and recenmending that the front 120 feet of the parcel be rezoned to. RS-1 (One~Family Residential) and, in addi- tion, as it was net the intention of the By-law to control construction on larger