SSS SE A ee Commentary ——___ xs Pees NDP policy paper echoes peace agenda . BY TIM FIRTH There is one truth in this nuclear age — no nation can achieve true security byitself. .. security in the nuclear age means common security,” Significantly, the federal New Demo- cratic Party chose to introduce their state- ment on Canadian defence policy with this quote from Cyrus Vance, former U.S. secre- tary of state. It is a theme which is central to anada’s Stake in Common Security, an April 1988 report by the NDP international airs committee. The report is both welcome and signifi- Cant. It is a stark contrast to the Conserva- tive government’s June, 1987 White Paper on Defence. And it marks a departure from the NDP’s initial response to the Conserva- tives’ formula for integration into the U.S. War machine. __ The Canadian peace movement will find in this NDP statement of policy much that Speaks directly to its own major concerns, and which contributes very positively to the dialogue among all Canadian peace acti- vists Concerning the immediate tasks ahead. From the perspective of the B.C. Peace Council, the report’s recommended policy on NATO does leave room for possible retreat on the NDP’s policy of uncondi- onal withdrawal, and the emphasis is not always where we might place it, or placed as strongly as we might like. _ But the report performs a major service presenting a comprehensive and articu- late statement of the “new thinking” needed to advance the cause of peace in Canada and internationally. As such it should be taken up for discussion enthusiastically. The basic thrust of Canada’s Stake is that anadian land, territory, airspace or terri- torial waters should not be used for any Purpose that could be seen as threatening to "4 third country. Security for Canada, it States, “relies not only on Canada’s ability to defend itself militarily but even more on an international order that recognizes and Tespects Canadian sovereignty. Therefore, Canada best contributes to its own defence when it takes measures to create a more just international order.” _ Our role, it states, is one of war preven- tion. We must unequivocally reject the doc- ttine of deterrence and its philosophy of heading off aggression by raising the level of threatened reprisals against “the other side.” The document acknowledges that the New Democrats’ precursor, the Co- operative Commonwealth Federation, “backed the formation of NATO in 1948, while hoping the UN could eventually make it unnecessary by establishing a global security system.” At the 1961 founding convention of the NDP, leader Tommy Douglas, (with more than a little wishful thinking, we might note), “led support for NATO, arguing that it might still function ... as an economic alliance ... to lead the way in helping the developing countries of the world.” The argument was also advanced that Canada could better work for disarmament within NATO. But the 1960s war in Vietnam, the emer- gence of fascist dictatorships in NATO April 1985 countries like Greece and Portugal, and NATO reluctance to support disarmament changed that perspective. At the NDP national convention in 1969, delegates voted for the current policy that Canada withdraw from NATO. Canada’s Stake hits NATO for its “cur- rent reliance on a nuclear strategy (based on flexible response) and in particular the fact that NATO is prepared to use nuclear wea- pons first.” The NDP report decisively refutes the NATO contention that the War- saw Pact enjoys superiority in conventional weapons. In the present climate of improved East- West relations, the NDP believes there is opportunity in the years immediately ahead for Canada, as long as it is in NATO, to use its membership to work for troop reduc- tions, a chemical weapons ban, a no-first- use policy, and so on. Letters Maurice Rush, B.C. leader, Communist Party of Canada, writes: The statements made by Energy Minister Jack Davis on ~ June 8 in response to an editorial in the Vancouver Sun cannot go unchallenged. First, he states, in defence of energy €xports to the United States, that the “export contract itself must be for a cer- tain term. And once that term has run its Course, export deliveries cease.” Who is he trying to kid? Does he want us to believe that after B.C. has built up huge electricity surpluses based on export the U.S. that we will be able to stop the flow of energy to the U.S.? What will be done with the huge surpluses which B.C. will not need? : Once we commit ourselves to develop- ing projects to export power to the U.S., we will be permanently stuck with that policy. The only way to avoid that is to Teject the policy of committing our energy resources to the U.S. And the best way to do that is to reject the continental energy Who is Jack Davis trying to kid? deal which is part of the Mulroney-Reagan trade deal. Second, with regard to the downstream benefits from the Columbia River, Davis claims that “patriation comes first. No return of downstream benefits, no firm power export sales to the U.S.” That statement is incredible. In about ten years time, Canada will have to rene- gotiate the sale of downstream benefits on the Columbia. (Downstream benefits are the power generated downstream of Can- adian storage dams. Half of those benefits belong to Canada under the Columbia treaty but for the first 30 years they were sold to the U.S. for $425 million. The first of the sales agreements expires in 1997 — Ed.) But the Socreds are rushing ahead now with development of energy for export even before the downstream benefits are even negotiated. Last month, the National Energy Board and B.C. Hydro apparently reached a secret agreement, without public hearings, “the return of downstream benefits is . straightforward and honest answers from to allow the Crown corporation to reacti- vate the Burrard thermal station to pro- duce power for export to the U.S. And why were Davis and the Socred govern- ment in such a hurry to set up the B.C. Power Export Corporation to act as an . agency for handling large-scale exports to the U.S. if what he says is true — that there will be no firm sales to the U.S. until assured? Obviously, the Socred government is proceeding to arrange large scale exports of firm power on long term contracts long before the downstream benefits issue is settled. There is also the danger that those benefits will be negotiated away by the government in return for increased access to export markets in the U.S. The public should demand more Jack Davis. The Socred government and stop trying to pull the wool over the pub- lic’s eyes. But the policy it advances is for Canada to withdraw from NATO, after notifying the alliance of the intention to do so in “a subsequent term of NDP government.” To sum up its position on NATO, the report states that the “defence of Canada and the peace of the world depends to an important extent on the dissolution of the military blocs — NATO and the Warsaw Pact... . It is in this context that New Democrats are committed to Canada’s withdrawal from NATO; 2 There is far more Canadian-American entanglement in NORAD than through NATO, the report warns, and it predicts that “if Canada continues on its present course, the prospect is of complete absorp- tion into U.S: strategies.” An alternative the report proposes repla- ces NORAD with a new agreement “shorn of any links to ballistic missile defence (and) to devise —under Canada’s leadership and management — improved peacetime sur- veillance and an improved warning system in the event of crisis or war... .” Canada’s geographic position between the USSR and the U.S. not only makes it possible but necessary to play a role in reducing the risk of war. Canada must not be seen as endangering the security of either neighbour, the report argues. The stationing of weapons or weapons systems of an offensive nature on our terri- tory is more than a remote possibility. The use of our north in the Pentagon’s so-called Air Defence Initiative is just one of the alarming possibilities the report warns against. The reports states that an NDP govern- ment will not proceed with the “dangerous and extravagant purchase of nuclear- powered submarines.” Such a move, it says, might well be perceived by the USSR as threatening because the subs are of “great offensive capability (and would allow Can- ada) to become partners in the Forward Maritime Strategy of the U.S. Navy.” The report goes on to say that cruise missile tests and low-level flights of U.S. bombers over British Columbia raise the same question. Sovereignty over our extensive coastline, together with responsibility for fisheries management, mineral exploitation, pollu- tion control, and extensive search and rescue capabilities will necessitate what the document calls a “heavy emphasis on mari- time surveillance” and a correspondingly large portion of defence expenditures in this sector. Further, an NDP government will seek to extend the anti-nuclear actions of Australia, New Zealand and the eleven island states of the South Pacific Forum into the broader Pacific region. Those states are signatories to the Treaty of Rarontonga, which bans nuclear testing, stocking of nuclear arms and the dumping of nuclear waste. On a major point, the report notes that “the most effective way of bringing the arms race to a halt is a comprehensive test ban treaty.” The report favours strengthening the United Nations, restricting Canada’s role in the international arms trade, researching conversion of war industries and facilities. Canada’s Stake in Common Security characterizes the 1959 Defence Production Sharing Agreement with the U.S. as a “mil- itary free trade deal” which is “unacceptable to Canadian foreign policy and inimicable to our goals for a Canadian industrial pol- Icy.” The report also addresses other major concerns of the Canadian peace movement, including the reduction and elimination of cruise missiles, declaration of Canada as a nuclear-weapons-free zone and preventing Canadian participation in Star Wars. Tim Firth is co-ordinator of the B.C. Peace Council Pacific Tribune, June 15, 1988 e 5 SPER i i ct Raa Misa Zed bad ccd ais iil, da em Ne vid gi iy nalhisteibitillis Aidit Win, sidsntaninadamicaaene die nation ei rt Pa eee spentocmmteceeinepccccenm > © Seentetaemesunecsccmages 2 nes. aterm memeantsresseeememmctneeentvinesmacr* emeumaweammR ~~,