FROM OUR CONTEMPORARIES What errors led to Hungary uprisings? HE daily press, naturally, is T exaggerating and_ distort- img the events in Hungary But making the maximum allowance for lies and hysteria the hard facts must remain hard for progressives to take. What is the basis for the dis- satisfaction — dissatisfaction which both the Polish and Hungarian governments have admitted to exist and to be at least partially justified? In attempting to answer this question I may seem to stress negative things — the grim mistakes. Let me make this clear: at the outset that I believe that only the most blind can fail to see that the whole picture is a wonderful one of the world’s surge to- wards the new life which lies before us. There have been terrible er- rors and terrible barbarities in the building of that new world. But they are not even a tiny fraction of the cruelties, suffering and iniquity which are perpetrated daily and de- liberately in the old order. The socialist world is pain- fully exposing its own crimes as a warning that they must. never be allowed to happen again — but the western world can only exist by the contin- uation of its crimes and mer- ciless cruelties; the hangings in Cyprus, the mass shooting in Algeria are regular pages in the bloody history of im- perialism. And in our own country we know of the daily injustice of innocent people herded into jails, of mothers separated from their families, of people torn from their homes and livelihoods at the whim of a cruel dictatorship. The local newspapers which are so oblivious to the evils which stem from racialism have a hopeless task in trying to turn the Non-European peo- ple (of South Africa) against the people’s democracies with hypocritical cant about the ab- sence of civil liberties in Hun- gary. It is because it is so self- evident-that the Soviet Union and the People’s Democracies are the allies of every people struggling for freedom that many progressives have been reluctant to see the faults in these countries. And where they have seen the faults they have wanted to explain them away or brush them aside as unimportant. I lived and worked in one of the most advanced of the People’s Democracies for two years during the “Stalin” per- iod and I'll put down my im- pressions now — belatedly — in the hope that they will as- sist-in understanding what is happening. It was the period when Tito was being described — by me as well — as a U.S. agent and fascist; when the security stranglehold was at its stron- gest, and heavy sacrifices were being demanded of the peo- ple. I worked in an international organization with a large num- ber of other young people from all over the western world — and we all developed a cyni- cism towards the things about us that was a nagging worry to every one of us. One had.the choice of being cynical or bitterly critical — and it didn’t as much as enter our heads to be bitterly criti- cal. (The reason for this is another question—it certain- ly was not cowardice, for among us were Spaniards and Germans and resistance fight- ers who had fought and been prepared to die for liberty.) Almost each day we sat — often by candlelight — and discussed the grotesque ex- amples of red tape, inefficien- cy and buck-passing which marked the work of almost ev- ery civil servant and minor official we had dealings with. We sat by candlelight be- cause large sections of the city were plunged into: dark- ness for hours while the power plant rested — and we won- dered how it could be that so many years after the war one of Europe’s greatest and weal- thiest cities should.suffer such blackout for lack of a gener- ating plant. We watched the production statistics soar and were happy at this clear proof of the effi- cacy of socialist planning. But it was a standard topic of dis- cussion that apart from basic essentials — which were cheap —everything else was incred- ibly expensive or unobtain- able. And every time one of us made a trip to the west his notebook was full of requests. Bring back some razor blades, a decent can opener, a pot scourer. And how could we make light of the censorship? No everyday western publications could be obtained, and there were even times when you couldn’t get the Daily Worker. Or the steady monotony of the films? The few films from the west were always packed to capacity. At a trivial French show which had drawn capa- city crowds for ages I got into conversation with the man next to me and asked for the reason for the film’s popular- ity. “There’s nothing about peace in it,” he said. “Our films — peace, peace, peace. It makes you sick!” And he was wearing a Communist party badge. Worst of all, perhaps, and something we couldn’t explain away very easily was the fact that the Soviet delegates who worked with us were privi- leged people, expected to be respected and to have the best of things and — let’s face it — they looked down on every- one else! (How noticeable it was, and what a constant topic of discussion, that the Chinese were always modest and un- assuming and lived together with the other delegates, re- fusing to accept any privil- eges.) I have listed well known The Soviet tanks stood between the Hungarian people and things — very small things and quite big things. Things which had good reason and things which had no reason, and probably mainly things which fall somewhere between the two extremes. But even when there were things which were obviously bad, instead of recognizing them as bad, I blamed my own middle-class “intellectual” background as the reason for my fault-finding. Others did the same. All these big things and little things explained the phenom- enon that we so often discuss- ed. The fact that while there was on the one hand a big body of politically-conscious enthusiastic and vigorous peo- ple backing the regime, there was an alarmingly large num- ber of ordinary citizens who were against it. Tell the tram-driver you’re going to England and he shakes you with his, “Ah, it’s better there.” OPEN FORUM Issues not tackled DR. J. B. BLUMES, Van- couver, B.C.: Reluctantly I was not a candidate for Van- couver School Board in this year’s civic election. The issues on which I have campaigned in the past few years are still very much be- fore us, however. Because of the lack of satisfactory op- position to the NPA, especial- ly on the school board, I have come to the conclusion that many vital problems facing us in the field of education cannot be properly brought forward in the electoral arena at this time. The problem of low milk consumption is worse than ever and in spite of lip ser- vice to the idea of free milk in the schools, nothing has been done about it. There has been some speed- up in-school construction, but there is still much overcrowd- ing in classrooms, particularly in high schools. Economies practiced through building larger high schools make it impossible to give proper at- tention to many teen-agers at a time when it can mean keep- ing some of them off the road that leads to juvenile delin- quency. The question of shortage also becomes ever more pressing, but school trustees concern themselves only with presenting a “solid front” against legitimate de- mands of teachers for increas- ed pay and improved condi- tions. It is most unfortunate, how- teacher ever, that in the electoral arena no fair opportunity is present- ed to discuss these issues -and to encourage people to vote on the basis of their concern for these issues. We vigorously attack one- party government in other countries, but because of the constant campaign of vilifi- cation against independent candidates on the civic scene our city is virtually in the hands of a one-party form of administration. All independent voters, es- pecially labor, ratepayers’ as- sociations and other civic- minded bodies should get to- gether to organize an electoral alternative that will base it- self on issues. I want to thank the more than 20,000 people who have voted for my program in past elections. I shall continue to work for it and hope to be back as a candidate at a more appropriate time. Own people first OLD AGE PENSIONER, Vancouver, B.C.: I am an old age pensioner, born in this country and now 74 years old. In my day I have worked on the farms and railroads and I think I have done more for my country than some of these fat-rumped politicians down at Ottawa who have made sure they don’t have to live on what they hand us. Let’s look after our own peo- ple before we start giving handouts to Hungarians: who didn’t make any attempt to fight fascism when they had it. DECEMBER 14, 1956 — PACIFIC TRIBUNE — the restoration of fascism: Speak to the judge and is hints that the party puts PP sure on him in political cases | The nurse will tell you PY | terly that her father wa surgeon and her gran dat before him, but she coul ie register at the university te cause she wasn’t from 4 nea” ing class background. ibe: ter-nursing is the closest 4 would let me get.” a The election results shows that 97 percent of the ar a voted for the government “iq standard wry joke War is met the whole opposition? morning.” * * xa and What is misleading i what made it so difficll + conceive of a revolt 16 sul so 4 even these people were t aware of the achieveme® the socialist regime. ople I met hundreds of PE i. who were vehemently ' et eve. government. But I n ted a single one who wal return to capitalism. 9 30" They wanted to keep fro" cial security and freedo™ the which socialism had brow ow the health facilities, © put opportunities for childre®: eed they didn’t recognize thé “a4 for the bad things which come with the good. ably Mainly they were P? abso” ent fear of unemploy i afathel me wrong. It was probably soe . lutely necessary to S@ gave! living standards to the? nd opment of heavy indus ces” defense, it was certainly 8” op sary to impose limitatlOl freedom to prevent © revolution. they But in some degree ine were undoubtedly righ e 10? sacrifices called for We ree” great, the limitations on n 1? dom out of all propor? scent the need. This has noW yer™ boldly stated by the Slat ments of Hungary and 0 And the governments ople® Soviet Union and the a {0 Democracies are ple sso bring about the Me™ aay changes — without in 2% met! sacrificing the achie of socialism. for thé A new future dawns “ft the world. The bitter lessons © s94 past: have ‘been learné 3 {be we of. other-countries jo {0 gainers, for our trans! y tH ‘the new age will be F simpler. As Cape Town New g! pa ora Fa 7