eS Saget are "A 4 LEGENDE LEGEND - Liberated ree Zone theres Aree still under tnemy control PLA F attacks Fre oncere sown fe contedle de samen af atlaguee por les Ploces under reveletionary (rongs continwal attacks ! Attagues ininterrompues FAP L Communnations parely sed ¢ Vere de communications porelytde a ae ae er Ber / Even with a half-million troops, a thirteen-year _/ Presence, and a 66-million-dollar-a-day war expenditure, America has sensationally demonstrated that not one "f Square inch of South Viet Nam has been secured. J (Reuter, 5-2-1968). A i ie NWS ae TIEN LONG XuY === — Vung Tay = Byte peg — —— = ; We think the American people should be getting H GIA ready to accept, if they have not already, the prospect that the whole Viet Nam effort may be doomed, i may be falling apart beneath our feet. (Wall Street Journal, 23-2-68). 3. Recent events such as Viet Cong attacks on all of South Viet Nam principal cities — even the capital of Saigon — show that the South Vietnamese govern- ment is utterly inept, has in fact collapsed and has no control over the country, despite our t dous expen- ditures of money and lives, and dreadful losses among the Vietnamese people. (Ernest Gruening, American senator, AP, 24-2-68). j= df. ‘= rE —— I £9 ts Ao = NLF CONTROLS NEARLY ALL SOUTH VIETNAM Pp shows the National Liberation Front in virtual control of most of South Vietnam. Small arrows show ry major city and U.S. military base encircled and under attack. This map shows the desperate position of U.S. and puppet forces. In a statement last week the NLF said the key issue facing the Paris talks was her the Nixon Administration was willing to end its aggression and withdraw its troops unconditionally. said, was the decisive question, not whether talks were held in public or private. Tribune VOL. 30, NO. 14 10c FOREST POLICY HiT Socreds support monopoly control Charges that the Socred government has put “‘itself in harness’ to the big forest monopolies, and that a handful of them dominate B.C.’s major industry resounded through the Legislature last week. , The attack on the govern- ment’s forest policies came from the NDP MLAs and was spearheaded by Vancouver East MLA Bob Williams who said that the Socred government operates a ‘built-in system of deals within the monopoly of the big companies in B.C.”’ In the attack on the monopoly- ridden forest industry in B.C. and the government's policy, the following points were made: e B.C.’s forest industry is dominated by the ‘big five’’ who have monopoly control and dominate the northern half of Vancouver Island. These ‘corporate empires’’ were branded as ‘‘corporate banana republics within B.C.’ .The five forestry giants named were MacMillan-Bloedel, Crown Zellerbach, Rayonier, Canadian Forest Products and the Tahsis Company. e ‘We own the trees but we are acting as if they belong to someone else,’ said MLA Bob Williams, who charged that a total of between 60 to 70 million acres of forest land under tenure (mostly in tree farm licences) is held by forestry companies in B.C. yet no property tax is paid on the land. e The House was told that payments from tree farm licence holders amounts to a cent an acre or $10,000 a year per million acres and even less from holders of pulp harvesting areas. © Asking the question: ‘‘How much does the_ industry contribute to provincial revenues,’ the NDP charged that only about three per cent of the province’s total revenue comes from the forest industry. Out of a billion dollar budget about $70 million - or about seven per cent - is listed as forestry revenue. WILLIAM KASHTAN, But, the NDP pointed out, you have to deduct from that the cost of forest service, $28 million, and then the logging tax because it's simply an income tax of $12 million - which leaves an actual income from the forest industry of $30 million - or three per cent of the province's total revenue. e Charging that the monopo- lies are making huge capital See FORESTRY, pg. 12 national leader of the Communist Party, will deliver the keynote address at the opening session of the Party's national convention which meets in Toronto over the Easter weekend. Coming before the parley will be resolutions covering labor legislation, the need for a new Canadian constitution, democratization of education, the crisis in agriculture, housing, poverty and the Native peoples. A contingent of 26 delegates from B.C. will attend the parley.