April 14th, 1980.

Alderman Mabbett introduced a By-law to amend the "Water Development

3B/L #1748 -
Water Dev. Cost Cost Charge By~law, 1979, No. 1657".
Chg. B/L, 1979,

No, 1657 - lst Moved by Alderman Mabbett:

Thfee Rdgs.

Seconded by Alderman Traboulay:

That By-law No. 1748 be read a First time.

Carried.

Moved by Alderman Keryluk:

Secorided by Alderman Wright:

That By-law No. 1748 be read a second time.

Carried,

Moved by Alderman Mabbett:

Seconded by Alderman Traboulay:

That By-law No. 1748 be read a third time.

Carried.
City Admin., From the City Administrator, April llth, 1980 cdvising of a draft
‘Apr 11/80 re

‘Flashing Signs. of an amendment to Sign Regulation By-law No. 1661 to permit flashing

signs and advising if Council wishes the proposed By-law No. 1749 could

5
}

be given the first three readings.

Moved by Alderman Keryluk:

Seconded by Alderman Mabbett:

That By-law No. 1749 be read a first time.

Prior to the question being called on the foregoing resolution
discussion ensued. Alderman Keryluk stated in his opinion the proposed
by-law amendment would be difficult to administer. Alderman Cates spoke
against allowing flashing signs and Alderman Wright stated in his opinion
owners of buildings and stores should use lighted signs but not flashing
signs. Alderman Mabbett spoke in favour of allowing Flashing signs.
Alderman Ranger spoke against flashing signs stating in his opinion it
would be a step backward and 1eminded Council. that new signs as well as
existing signs would be affected and that the Council could be discriminating
against businesses in other areas. Alderman Traboulay spoke in support
of flashing signs and also spoke in favour of getting some input from

the public on thelr feelings regarding flashing signs.