bl dl 0 ees Ee ve Pe | Dll Te Tt) ei 1 4 System, cae aS |e ee 1 | Mexic today By JAMES BREMNER Sometimes it is amazing how two people can look at the same Scene and yet see completely different things. I was in Mexico City at the same time as syndi- cated columnist John Chamber- lain. In his “Washington Scene” he has been doing a series on Mexico, combining a vacation with some neat political pieces in support of the Establishment. That’s one way to have a holi- day with pay! Chamberlain is positively en- tranced by the prosperity of the middle class of Mexico. I, on the other hand, was appalled by the Poverty of workers and peas- ants. It’s a question of your Point of view. _ Mexico City, with its popula- tion of nearly five million, is a City of contrasts. Its architec- ture is inspired, particularly the new university, museum of an- thropology and the old churches. Numerous, well-treed parks and. boulevards occur here and there. Massive sculpture and murals testify to the artistic bent of its people. Handicrafts in silver and leather show remarkable talent. The National Ballet is a beauti- ful tribute to the historic, native tradition of the dance. The main traffic arteries in Mexico City are wide and roar- ing with an endless stream of Cars and taxis. Reforma Boule- vard is a typical example: It is the U.S. main street in a Latin Setting, broad and clean, with elegant buildings and expensive Shops. But it is a facade. One does not have to go far from the main thoroughfare to discover the real Mexico City. Narrow, crowded housing, and hole-in-the-wall shops predomi- nate. Of course there ‘are the well-to-do sections of the city, but their high-walled enclosures are mute testimony to their ex- clusiveness and_ self-conscious desire for seclusion. Chamberlain is so pleased with the progréss of Mexico’s middle class that he scarcely talks about anything else. How- ever, he cannot resist. making comparisons with Cuba. He notes rather wryly, “The Mexi- can revolution has created a big middle class; the Castroite revo- lution has destroyed a previous: ly existing bourgeois society... the future leaders of a true na- tionalist Cuba are all in Miami, Florida. They are starting the businesses there — sports cloth- ing, manufacture, entertainment, Bacardi rum, and so on.” I-don’t know how far into the ranks Chamberlain’s middle slass_ goes, but I have never seen such mass business activity as in Mexico City. On. a week- and the streets throng with ven- jors selling everything from fruit to nuts, to picture post- sards. There are hundreds of shoe-shine men with their quaint, portable stalls. An army of children sells Chiclets and newspapers. Certainly, for indi- vidual effort and initiative in turning a small profit, the na- tives of Mexico City haven't missed a bet. All this is absent in Havana, it is true. And along with it the sad scenes of native mothers and their children squatting on bare, cold sidewalks trying -to solicit a few coppers from the sale of nuts. The pattern of Mexican inter- nal trading activity is’ similar to the rest of Latin America, out- side of Cuba. The main indus- trial and trading effort is owned and controlled by the U.S., but native businessmen are encour- aged as junior partners. It gives the same sort of false front to the nation’s business activity as Refoma Boulevard does to the overcrowded slums. Ironically, all political talk in Mexico is in terms of ‘‘the revo- lution.” It is a revolution betray- ed. The vast majority of the country’s 37 million is very poor, indeed. Well over ‘half of the people are engaged in agricul- ture, but it is: insufficiently de- veloped to feed the population Food must be imported. A brave beginning was made in 1938 by the government to control Mexico’s natural re- sources. In that year oil was na- ationalized. Ten years of inter- national litigation _ followed. Mexico finally agreed to indem- nify U.S., British and Dutch for- mer owners to the tune of over $100 million. Mining is the principal indus- try of Mexico. Its mineral re- sources are among the richest in the world. The most striking feature in Mexican mining: is foreign ownership. Of about 31,- 000 mining properties, only three dercent are under the ownership of Mexican nationals. The Mexican péople are pre- dominately native Indian, de- scendants of the once mighty civilization led by the Aztecs. They. are a. proud, stoic, hard- working and sensitive people. They have a great sense of his- tory and recall. their past with - mixed nostalgia and bitterness. ‘It may be, as Chamberlain says, the Mexican. Seople believe in the present free enterprise system. with its ‘snail-like re- forms. But never have I seen a people so dependent on their wits to survive. Arid with that, never have I seen such anxiety over petty thievery as in Mexico City. Perhaps this accounts for the large police force, which seems to be everywhere. The police are, by all odds, the best dressed people in Mexico City, and certainly the most natty law officers in the world! I was in Mexico’s capital for the Juarez Memorial Day cele- brations, as was Chamberlain. He was enamored by the respec- table, trade union participation in the official proceedings. How- ever, to me, the: more note- worthy were the police squads, with riot guns, mounting guard at the outside of the iron-fenced American embassy. Athough I didn’t see any sign of a demon- stration, I assumed this to be a precautionary measure against a possible gathering of people opposed to U.S. policy in Viet- nam. : .No doubt Mexican doctors, lawyers and businessmen have a high standard of living. As the working ‘elite of the Establish ment, they enjoy creature com forts far above the ordinary people. But all the middle class of Mexico is not sold on the present fast-buck system. A great many professional people, particularly artists and- writers, have a social conscience. They think personal money-grubbing is scarcely a- moral. goal, and their work shows a loftier aim— to serve the people. I suspect Socialist Cuba will continue to invite comparisons with the rest of Latin America: In my view, the dignity of the common man in Cuba is more than a match for the free enter- prise tempo in Mexico. In time, the people of Mexico will agree. And whereby lies the dilemma of Washington and its Chamber. lains. : Britain's new daily voice of the Left Britain’s. new daily voice of the Left, the Morning Star (in- Corporating the Daily Worker) peeeared on newsstands - April {In a front pag. editorial edi- tor George Matthews outlined the stand the paper will take. ete is the text of his editorial This is a unique daily news- Paper. It is the only one in Bri- tain independent of the handful Of Press lords who control the rest of the Press. lt is the only one owned by (ts readers through a Coopera- tive Society. So it is the only. ne which cannot be taken over. : It is also the only daily voice 2 que Left. Other newspapers, ‘cluding all the Sunday news- ges except the Sunday Citi- noe Put the views of Big Busi- : S because they are run for Profit and to defend the profit We are a committed news- paper — committed to the cause of sanity, of peace and of pro- gress. We are on the side of the unions. Our predecessor, the Daily Worker, in whose 36-year- old tradition we are proud to fol- low, was the only. to counter the hysteria whipped- up by.the “noose trial” recently. We shall continue to resist at- temps to make the unions the scapegoats for the blunders either of governments or profit- seeking employers. We are on the side of the daily paper people of Vietnam, North and South, and of the growing move- ments in America which oppose the Vietnam war. We are on the side of those who, behind the false glitter of this so-called affluent society, still live in appalling conditions of poverty and ill-health. — We shall fight for justice for the old people, the disabled, the badly-housed, the tenants, and the low-paid. We are also on the side of youth, so many of whom are in revolt against the get-rich-quick ' rat-race of our capitalist society, and whose future is darkened by the ever-present shadow of the hydrogen bomb. We are for a new society, a Socialist society, replacing the out-of-date, obsolete, creaking system under which we live with a modern, scientific, 20th-century system in which the working people will own, and controi. their country. Editorialiy, we express Com- munist views. At the same time we offer a platform to all genu- ine Left opinion. Our columns are open for dis- cussion and controversy, to help unite the diverse Left and pro gressive trends in Britain for ‘their common aims. The Morning Star is an all- round newspaper. It will give a first-class general news service, including news of the Labor movement and from the fac- tories which make it indispen- sable to trade unions and Social- ists. It has features of interest to all the family — to wives as well as husbands, to teenagers and children, to highbrows and lowbrows, to those who like the Beatles and those who like Bact and those who like both. May 13, 1966—PACIFIC TRIBUNE—Page 5 sh tee ntl «dnp si